OtherGround Forums 9/11: Incontrovertible Proof Government is Lying

6/11/14 12:42 AM
1/1/01
Posts: 6686
If anyone watches this short video, and still believes the official government story about 9/11, then sorry, you are a person who is beyond help, as you are either a liar, or you are really naïve or stupid.


Check it out:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YaFGSPErKU
6/11/14 12:51 AM
3/18/12
Posts: 4362
In for later Phone Post 3.0
6/11/14 12:57 AM
9/7/10
Posts: 2719
In Phone Post 3.0
6/11/14 12:59 AM
1/1/01
Posts: 6688
The NIST guy in the video is clearly a lying piece of shit.
6/11/14 1:21 AM
1/1/01
Posts: 6689
Is there are blue namer out there who can post the video? Thanks in advance.
6/11/14 1:24 AM
5/7/10
Posts: 610
Later Phone Post 3.0
6/11/14 1:36 AM
12/15/11
Posts: 10000

In

6/11/14 2:15 AM
7/20/09
Posts: 3481
Res ipsa loquitar -
TryhardNobody - Res Ipsa, you are a very intelligent person that i respect but i don't think you believe any of the 9/11 stuff. I'd like you to answer a question for me or at least consider it for a moment if you have time. If the Trade Centers were a building collapse with the only active force being gravity, where did the energy come from to turn all that concrete into dust BEFORE it hit the ground? Where did the energy come from to fuse concrete and steel together? Where did the energy come from to throw steel girders 400 feet sideways at high speeds and lodge them in other buildings? All from gravity? Sorry about the frat. I still like you no matter what you think.

I will ponder it, but my initial response is I dont know. And I can be honest by saying I cant fabricate an idea of how it happened other than guess that immense pressures  beyond my comprehension combined with gravity was the culprit. Those mixed with the very unique design of that building....its just so hard to compare anything to it. Know what I am saying?

I know this. The truthers want to be validated or they wouldnt have a reference to a "peer reviewed" article as the first note under a video, as in this instance. If the "journal" has mackeeper pop ups (or the one I posted) as it did I can only cringe and laugh. I am not taking that seriously. Really, could you?

 

And I do believe this...9/11 as a conspiracy. Permissibility is a possibility. 

 

And thanks for the confidence. The respect is mutual.

Yup. I think the physics actually make sense but I won't get into that. As far as conspiracy theories go I believe they let it happen. Phone Post 3.0
6/11/14 2:20 AM
12/6/13
Posts: 64
In for later Phone Post 3.0
6/11/14 2:43 AM
5/30/05
Posts: 61232
ABLE DANGER

/thread
6/11/14 3:23 AM
1/1/01
Posts: 6693
ttt
6/11/14 6:30 AM
12/18/07
Posts: 9333
In Phone Post 3.0
6/11/14 6:37 AM
1/1/01
Posts: 15493
Lol @ YouTube documentaries Phone Post 3.0
6/11/14 6:41 AM
7/4/11
Posts: 4588
Res ipsa loquitar - 

I love the info under the video that links to an academic journal. As it says..."

Smoking Gun Proof :

Peer Reviewed Primary Article confirms Thermite was Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

 

 

 

 

 

This journal is very professional. When the pop up appeared I knew I was in a rigourous bastion of science. And that pop-up.....

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Your slip is showing.


People really don't understand what peer reviewed means or how to pick their sources lol

6/11/14 7:15 AM
4/24/07
Posts: 19032



Of course the truth could be found on Youtube....
6/11/14 7:56 AM
4/2/10
Posts: 3539
Sub Phone Post 3.0
6/11/14 8:00 AM
1/1/01
Posts: 4200
A lot of 9/11 conspiracy theories are pure insanity.

The collapse of the buildings (especially 7) and the immediate confiscation and non-release of nearby surveillance footage of the pentagon are two things that are, at the very least, perplexing.
6/11/14 8:01 AM
5/27/13
Posts: 215
In for later Phone Post 3.0
6/11/14 8:06 AM
11/28/09
Posts: 16294
David@accu -


Of course the truth could be found on Youtube....
This all day! Phone Post 3.0
6/11/14 8:16 AM
1/1/01
Posts: 46022

Our government lied? Unpossible!

6/11/14 8:17 AM
5/18/13
Posts: 118
Sub-a-dub-dub Phone Post 3.0
6/11/14 8:54 AM
8/27/02
Posts: 612
As soon as the words "Incontrovertible Proof" or "100% Proof" or "Undeniable Proof" are used...I almost immediately dismiss a claim. .
6/11/14 10:02 AM
12/15/11
Posts: 10013

..

6/11/14 11:05 AM
1/1/01
Posts: 31948
NeckCranks - A lot of 9/11 conspiracy theories are pure insanity.

The collapse of the buildings (especially 7) and the immediate confiscation and non-release of nearby surveillance footage of the pentagon are two things that are, at the very least, perplexing.
Nothing perplexing at all about either the main towers or wtc 7's collapse. Phone Post 3.0
6/11/14 11:19 AM
1/1/01
Posts: 77709
TryhardNobody - Res Ipsa, you are a very intelligent person that i respect but i don't think you believe any of the 9/11 stuff. I'd like you to answer a question for me or at least consider it for a moment if you have time. If the Trade Centers were a building collapse with the only active force being gravity, where did the energy come from to turn all that concrete into dust BEFORE it hit the ground? Where did the energy come from to fuse concrete and steel together? Where did the energy come from to throw steel girders 400 feet sideways at high speeds and lodge them in other buildings? All from gravity? Sorry about the frat. I still like you no matter what you think.

How much concrete was turned into dust, and how much concrete was left in the rubble pile?