pulsar -David@accu -pulsar -I No Kung Foo -pulsar -
In for the apologists doing their thing!
The amount of smoke on this issue in comparison to the grief Killary got over her charity aren't even in the same ballpark, but we'll hear crickets from the usual suspects... Of course.
If her foundation had nothing to do with political favors, why is it going out of business now?
Getting smashed in the election miight have something to do with it...
Do you really want a marketing 101 spiel? Of course the Clinton name value (with the former POTUS as well) was coercive for donations. Frankly, if donors were hoping to get some attention via their giving, more fool on them.
The whole thing is kind of dumb. If the Clintons were using their name to fleece the wealthy into giving donations, then more power to them. Better than the current POTUS who uses his name to enrich himself first and foremost.
How does getting smashed in the election effect people donating to the chairity? Suddenly the chairities aren't worth donating to because she lost? LMAO!!! Good try but that was the worst excuse I have ever heard.
The election pyschologically ruined her - I think that's quite obvious. I would think the collateral of losing motivation to carry on with the foundation would be among the smaller things that have been lost or damaged.
You're trying to re-write history here. She didn't shut it down because she lost motivation. She shut it down because nobody was donating to it anymore. My question is why would people stop donating if she lost?