OtherGround Forum >> Piers Morgan gets owned over gun control

Mihow - all twitter should have pictures and shit

is Morgan on CNN or some such?

tho he was 'owned' in conversation, I hope the lady doesn't think we should all have laser guided missles

Outlaw'd by Lytle -  I'm from the UK, sorry about Piers, he's a clown.

I've no idea how he managed to break into American media.

I'd advise you guys to get rid of him pronto.

amadeus - 

Mihow - all twitter should have pictures and shit

is Morgan on CNN or some such?

tho he was 'owned' in conversation, I hope the lady doesn't think we should all have laser guided missles

Laser guided missiles aren't exactly 'bare-able arms'...

ProteusSFM - 

who is that?  She's fucking gorgeous!!

Why is it we hear all about these ancient, sacrosanct documents be it the Constitution or the bible, but then people are happy to take modern rulings on them when they're in favor of their position.

I don't understand why there aren't MORE and more amendments, clearly that was the way in which the founding fathers inteneded as can be seen by the number of early amendments. They'd be rolling in their graves at a time with vast technological upheavel yet few corresponding changes to the Constitution.

Shogun of Harlem - LOL, the OG Liberals didn't like it too much, but didn't comment. I did get 3 vote downs in less than 5 mins. Bitches get stitches.

jasonhightower -  It's an ignorant, short sided perspective. Lets just ignore all the root causes and blame the guns. Hell, look at Sweden... They issue guns to all men for military reasons, arming the country in essence, and they have one of the lowest crime rates in the world.

GOREILLAMAN - 

jasonhightower -  It's an ignorant, short sided perspective. Lets just ignore all the root causes and blame the guns. Hell, look at Sweden... They issue guns to all men for military reasons, arming the country in essence, and they have one of the lowest crime rates in the world.

I think you mean Switzerland.

maantren - One of the clearest things about the way the Founding Fathers set up the Constitution is that they expected it to evolve over time in concert with social & technological change. IMO most of them would be pretty disappointed to find people 200+ years in the future quibbling over their word choices while missing any sense of a wider context.

YES!

The US constitution (and without political connotations) was one of the most progressive documents ever written. I feel that approach has changed remarkably. Particuarly over the last 30 years - which basically correlates with the advancement of religious neo conservatism.

ksac - 

sandmanscomin4u - 

ksac - So I can has a nuclear weapon then?

Seems like a bearable arm to me... Let me know how it works out and then ill try

Well, it seems to illegal to own one. According to this woman, it shouldn't be so. I may need to protect myself from the government (big argument made against gun control) using the the "same weaponry".

Basically I'm saying the argument is far from being a simple one.

pulsar -

Why is it we hear all about these ancient, sacrosanct documents be it the Constitution or the bible, but then people are happy to take modern rulings on them when they're in favor of their position.

I don't understand why there aren't MORE and more amendments, clearly that was the way in which the founding fathers inteneded as can be seen by the number of early amendments. They'd be rolling in their graves at a time with vast technological upheavel yet few corresponding changes to the Constitution.

in_different - I dont get the big deal. people have a difference of opinion. so what.

I support allowing people to get guns for their safety, but let's not pretend there is only one side to this debate. people dont need fucking elephant guns. people do not need to walk around main street with a rifle. the average citizen is a tard. i guarantee your facebook feed is supplied with dozens of them this second.

Ok, thanks for that info amadeus.

maantren - One of the clearest things about the way the Founding Fathers set up the Constitution is that they expected it to evolve over time in concert with social & technological change. IMO most of them would be pretty disappointed to find people 200+ years in the future quibbling over their word choices while missing any sense of a wider context.