OtherGround Forum >> 10 Pro-Gun Myths: Shot Down

| Share | Email | Subscribe | Check IPs

[ 1 ] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1/31/13 11:02 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Tidbits Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/1/01
Posts: 8269
 

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/01/pro-gun-myths-fact-check


FACTS, not opinion.

how long before the source is attacked?
1/31/13 11:03 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
hankhill Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/11/06
Posts: 10253
Blue namer please....
1/31/13 11:06 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
AlexanderTheGOAT 41 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/28/11
Posts: 13666
"how long before the source is attacked?"

Probably just as soon as people who post from Breibart or whoever. Phone Post
1/31/13 11:10 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Rogans secret stash 26 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 9/1/11
Posts: 872
Yawn. 240k subscribers and bi-monthly. Phone Post
1/31/13 11:10 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
awilson82 29 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 11/12/07
Posts: 15826

"Myth #2: Guns don't kill people—people kill people.
Fact-check:
People with more guns tend to kill more people—with guns. The states with the highest gun ownership rates have a gun murder rate 114% higher than those with the lowest gun ownership rates. Also, gun death rates tend to be higher in states with higher rates of gun ownership."

Wow no shit so states where people have guns have more gun murders? Whoda thunk it. Except who fucking cares TOTAL murder rates matter not firearm murder rates. The murder rate in Wyoming and Montana where gun ownership is high and gun murders are supposedly high are 3.2 and 2,8 respectively. Which is well below national average. Not to mention why do total gun deaths matter more than half are suicides.

1/31/13 11:12 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
awilson82 29 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 11/12/07
Posts: 15827

 

 In states with Stand Your Ground and other laws making it easier to shoot in self-defense, those policies have been linked to a 7 to 10% increase in homicides."

 

Many of which are ruled justifiable or at worst manslaughter and the source is quoting the amount reported not the amount of convictions.

1/31/13 11:13 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Tidbits Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/1/01
Posts: 8270
awilson82 - 

"Myth #2: Guns don't kill people—people kill people.
Fact-check:
People with more guns tend to kill more people—with guns. The states with the highest gun ownership rates have a gun murder rate 114% higher than those with the lowest gun ownership rates. Also, gun death rates tend to be higher in states with higher rates of gun ownership."

Wow no shit so states where people have guns have more gun murders? Whoda thunk it. Except who fucking cares TOTAL murder rates matter not firearm murder rates. The murder rate in Wyoming and Montana where gun ownership is high and gun murders are supposedly high are 3.2 and 2,8 respectively. Which is well below national average. Not to mention why do total gun deaths matter more than half are suicides.


LOL. Talk about cherry picking your argument. The FACT is guns kill, period. Will people still kill others or commit suicide without them? Yes, but easy access to them means a greater chance of lethality (success).
1/31/13 11:13 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
paw 509 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/1/01
Posts: 32711
Tidbits - http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/01/pro-gun-myths-fact-check


FACTS, not opinion.

how long before the source is attacked?

The source won't have to be attacked, as some of their "facts" are very shady.  To take just one example,

Myth #8: "Vicious, violent video games" deserve more blame than guns.
Fact-check: So said NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre after Newtown. So what's up with Japan?

Japan isn't a good example as gun ownership is extremely restricted in Japan.  "In Japan, civilians are not allowed to possess handguns, hunting guns without specific approval5, military rifles, machine guns, any gunpowder charged firearm, certain air guns26 and imitation firearms38"

Looks like a strawman to me.

 

Basically, LaPierre is asserting that violent video games can increase violence.  Is that true?  I wouldn't doubt it.   A quick search showes that violent video game use increases aggression (http://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2000/04/video-games.aspx), so actual violence seems possible to this layperson.  The degree to which violent video games casue violence (and what constitutes a "violent" video game and such) I leave to those familiar with that field of study.

1/31/13 11:15 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
WidespreadPanic 279 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 12/29/06
Posts: 8975

Gun violence and crime have gone down with increased gun sales in Virginia recently.

 

1/31/13 11:15 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Tidbits Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/1/01
Posts: 8271
awilson82 - 

 

 In states with Stand Your Ground and other laws making it easier to shoot in self-defense, those policies have been linked to a 7 to 10% increase in homicides."

 

Many of which are ruled justifiable or at worst manslaughter and the source is quoting the amount reported not the amount of convictions.


"Many of which" LOL again. So if you have an increase of 7-10% in your rate of homicide and 1% of those homicides are justifed guess what? You still have an increase in homicides. killing is killing, justified or not. Also your term "Many of which" is BS. Provide numbers not an opinion.
1/31/13 11:15 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Biggy 13 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/1/01
Posts: 8316
this was one of the decent counter arguments till he got swarmed by anti-gun people:

"Owning a gun has been linked to higher risk of homicide, suicide, and accidental death by gun." So... what's the problem with this? As long as they keep it in the family, I'm not sure it matters. Of course, the Newtown crazy freak didn't do that and it would be nice to keep that sort of thing from happening, but I'm not sure I really care if some gun nut takes himself out.

I know this is a minor point, but I agree with everything in the post so that's all I got. The world would be a better place if everyone who owned a gun would just shoot themselves. Phone Post
1/31/13 11:16 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Chief Meteorologist Brick Tamland Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 7/12/10
Posts: 2601
In states with Stand Your Ground and other laws making it easier to shoot in self-defense, those policies have been linked to a 7 to 10% increase in homicides.
Good. Justifiable homicides are justifiable.
1/31/13 11:16 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
New Leaf 1.0 Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 3/6/06
Posts: 18850
The source should be attacked, just like you would attack it if the source was known to provide dishonest and biased information the other direction.

Anyone who intentionally reads Fox/Huffington/Mother Jones has no place in a real conversation about issues. Those who intentionally seek misinformation should be ignored.

BTW - there are plenty of "facts" that dispute the "facts" in that article.

Let me know when you can overcome the "fact" that Switzerland has the third highest rate of gun ownership in the world and one of the lowest incidents of violence around. I can produce "fact" after "fact" after "fact" to dispute your "facts." The difference being I use legitimate sources and actually fact check my facts, instead of just assuming they are true because they support what I want to be true.

I still remember you producing a list of "facts" about how much profit a bunch of big companies made and your "facts" were easily disputed by public records and you still thought they counted as "facts." I believe that list came from mother jones too.
1/31/13 11:16 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Rabadaba 10 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 5/6/11
Posts: 235
Sub for the article Phone Post
1/31/13 11:17 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Chief Meteorologist Brick Tamland Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 7/12/10
Posts: 2602
Also, Tidbits will be the FIRST person to attack the source of an article on Drudge Report. Go fuck your hypocritical ass OP.
1/31/13 11:17 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
awilson82 29 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 11/12/07
Posts: 15828

"Myth #4: More good guys with guns can stop rampaging bad guys.
Fact-check:
Mass shootings stopped by armed civilians in the past 30 years: 0
• Chances that a shooting at an ER involves guns taken from guards: 1 in 5"

Fact one while technically true is true because armed civilians are not allowed in almost all the locations where the shootings happen. The shooter in the I believe it was Oaklahoma mall shooting was seen by the shooter and aimed at him but didnt fire because he could hit bystanders behind the shooter. As often happens as soon as the shooter saw armed resistance he took his own life.

Id rather take the 1 in 5 chance and have an armed guard who could respond to a shooting than have not.

1/31/13 11:19 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
sicko 126 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/1/01
Posts: 23251
TTT for later
1/31/13 11:21 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
juszczec 64 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 2/23/03
Posts: 10790
I'd be interested in seeing corroborating statistics from a site that has no agenda to push.

I don't read Mother Jones enough to know if they've got a bias.
1/31/13 11:21 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Sagiv Lapkin 1337 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 3/23/07
Posts: 35244
NerdQuestionOfTheDay.com, Owner

LOL @ these "facts".

1/31/13 11:23 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Chief Meteorologist Brick Tamland Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 7/12/10
Posts: 2603
FACT: Assault weapons and mag limit bans did not stop Columbine.

They also would not have stopped the Virginia Tech shooting, Aurora shooting, or Newtown shooting.
1/31/13 11:24 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
awilson82 29 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 11/12/07
Posts: 15829

Half of their sources took in information and use unscientific methods to lead into the answers they want.

1/31/13 11:25 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
angryinch Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 3/14/04
Posts: 96163
awilson82 - 

"Myth #2: Guns don't kill people—people kill people.
Fact-check:
People with more guns tend to kill more people—with guns. The states with the highest gun ownership rates have a gun murder rate 114% higher than those with the lowest gun ownership rates. Also, gun death rates tend to be higher in states with higher rates of gun ownership."

Wow no shit so states where people have guns have more gun murders? Whoda thunk it. Except who fucking cares TOTAL murder rates matter not firearm murder rates. The murder rate in Wyoming and Montana where gun ownership is high and gun murders are supposedly high are 3.2 and 2,8 respectively. Which is well below national average. Not to mention why do total gun deaths matter more than half are suicides.


hrmm...I have a couple of guns.   They are sitting somewhere in my house.  To the best of my knowledge, none of my guns has ever gotten up and walked out of the house by itself and gone and shot someone all on its own.  The fact is, guns do not kill people.  

1/31/13 11:26 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
angryinch Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 3/14/04
Posts: 96164
awilson82 - 

"Myth #4: More good guys with guns can stop rampaging bad guys.
Fact-check:
Mass shootings stopped by armed civilians in the past 30 years: 0
 

This is a blatant lie.  

1/31/13 11:27 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
PINKsinglet 10 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/1/01
Posts: 9780

please site source of a gun killing someone to debunk Myth #2

 

Ive never seen or heard of a gun kiling anyone.  Hell i thought they were lifeless pieces of metal.

1/31/13 11:27 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
awilson82 29 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 11/12/07
Posts: 15830
Tidbits - 
awilson82 - 

"Myth #2: Guns don't kill people—people kill people.
Fact-check:
People with more guns tend to kill more people—with guns. The states with the highest gun ownership rates have a gun murder rate 114% higher than those with the lowest gun ownership rates. Also, gun death rates tend to be higher in states with higher rates of gun ownership."

Wow no shit so states where people have guns have more gun murders? Whoda thunk it. Except who fucking cares TOTAL murder rates matter not firearm murder rates. The murder rate in Wyoming and Montana where gun ownership is high and gun murders are supposedly high are 3.2 and 2,8 respectively. Which is well below national average. Not to mention why do total gun deaths matter more than half are suicides.


LOL. Talk about cherry picking your argument. The FACT is guns kill, period. Will people still kill others or commit suicide without them? Yes, but easy access to them means a greater chance of lethality (success).

How is that cherry picking the argument? They try to make a point about the high gun ownership states when they have some of the overall lowest murder rates its stupid and misleading like most of the list.

Which is better a murder rate that is 100% gun murders but a exponentially lower murder rate or a murder rate that is 0% gun murders but the overall murder rate is 5x higher?

[ 1 ] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

| Share | Email | Subscribe | Check IPs

Reply Post

You must log in to post a reply. Click here to login.