UnderGround Forum >> Lupo Locks Need to Be A UG Sticky
| 7/9/11 11:33 PM | |
TrickyG
27
Member Since: 2/23/07 Posts: 2180 |
Yeah, Haye was considerably ahead of Wlad by the time the lines closed in Britain, just lol @ that. ttt for Loopz' Lockz. |
| 7/10/11 1:10 AM | |
Bobby Lupo
60
Member Since: 1/12/05 Posts: 30809 |
NICK MANNING - Bobby, I was leaning Wlad and you put the icing on the cake. You bet with your head and not your heart- something that 95% of the jamokes out there can't do. I, for one, appreciate your picks. Sakara, Karo, Marcus Davis, Baroni and Malignaggi are my Kryptonite, but JJJ can straighten me out when needed. I couldn't get better than -200 on Wlad and then it started moving up to -270. What did Paddy Power have it at? |
| 7/10/11 1:13 AM | |
|
jjj2121
Member Since: 6/16/09 Posts: 16877 |
Dr Violence - Haye was an underdog on every UK bookie I checked I'm just going off the HBO broadcast, I bet Wlad in the states at -210 |
| 7/10/11 1:14 AM | |
|
jjj2121
Member Since: 6/16/09 Posts: 16878 |
Bobby Lupo -As a duo we are unstoppable. I was never as impressed by Sakara until you turned me onto him. That Weidman performance was very good, Weidman is just a stud wrestler and a future title challenger. He will style on Jorge.NICK MANNING - Bobby, I was leaning Wlad and you put the icing on the cake. You bet with your head and not your heart- something that 95% of the jamokes out there can't do. I, for one, appreciate your picks. |
| 7/10/11 1:21 AM | |
Dr Violence
32
Member Since: 1/24/07 Posts: 2902 |
jjj2121 -Yeah it was Larry Merchant right? Making stories up inside his crazy old head.Dr Violence - Haye was an underdog on every UK bookie I checked |
| 7/10/11 1:24 AM | |
|
jjj2121
Member Since: 6/16/09 Posts: 16881 |
Dr Violence -I don't think it was him, think it was Lampley but to be honest I'm not sure. Anyway Wlad at -210 was a fukin bargainjjj2121 -Yeah it was Larry Merchant right? Making stories up inside his crazy old head.Dr Violence - Haye was an underdog on every UK bookie I checked |
| 7/10/11 1:35 AM | |
Dr Violence
32
Member Since: 1/24/07 Posts: 2903 |
Bookmakers are expecting to take a small fortune when David Haye clashes with Wladimir Klitschko on July 2. |
| 7/11/11 5:39 AM | |
PosterBoyOwnsMe2
16
Member Since: 8/20/10 Posts: 1020 |
I shall use your betting advice
|
| 7/11/11 6:35 AM | |
mister_sticks
6
Member Since: 12/1/10 Posts: 447 |
Mods, u kno wat to do.
|
| 7/13/11 10:03 PM | |
NTXMMAjunky
18
Member Since: 1/17/11 Posts: 827 |
Is Tito going to be a big payout again? Hmmmmmm
|
| 7/13/11 10:10 PM | |
|
MJM1912
Member Since: 4/11/09 Posts: 605 |
TTT for Lupo. |
| 7/13/11 11:03 PM | |
Bobby Lupo
60
Member Since: 1/12/05 Posts: 30952 |
NTXMMAjunky - Is Tito going to be a big payout again? Hmmmmmm I don't know. I hate when I get emotionally invested in a feel good story. Rashad was preparing for a guy in Davis, who at this point is better at everything that Tito brings to this fight than Tito himself. I think Tito beat Bader because Bader seems to be a bit on the nervous side and doesn't perform to 100%; this isn't a problem with Rashad. Tito probably won't have the same looseness in his striking as he had against Bader because of Rashad's excellent hands for MMA and this won't give Tito the same opportunity to land something hard. Tito will likely use the high chamber/guard like he did in the Chuck fights in order to block shots. When he does this, he fights much more defensive minded and if that's the case, he'll pose no threat to Rashad. The 2007 fight should have no bearing on this other than giving Tito something to motivate himself with. I see Rashad using his boxing and movement to win a fairly easy 30-27 decision. I think Tito will lose steam as the fight goes on, but will have his moments where he shows that he's still relevant in the division. Tito peaked for Bader and caught lightning in a bottle. Rashad might have some rust, but he was training for absolute top guys and will be more than ready. |
| 7/13/11 11:14 PM | |
Dr Violence
32
Member Since: 1/24/07 Posts: 2926 |
I think Rashad has more underlying confidence issues than Bader. He almost never lets go at 100% and usually takes just enough risk to win, hence all the decisions. |
| 7/13/11 11:20 PM | |
|
smth416
Member Since: 11/11/09 Posts: 2880 |
I agree almost completely with your analysis. The line on this fight is too steep for me though and I would only bet on Rashad if anything |
| 7/17/11 7:37 PM | |||||||||||||||
|
jjj2121
Member Since: 6/16/09 Posts: 17291 |
My guy has a line out, I think Oddessa has been reading every post of this thread and taken the sage advice of Mr. Lupo as well as my own.
|
||||||||||||||
| 7/17/11 8:34 PM | |||||||||||||||
|
jjj2121
Edited: 07/17/11 8:44 PM Member Since: 6/16/09 Posts: 17294 |
FreeGSTQ/iLoveThePosterboy -Like it even more now that you are on the other side.jjj2121 - My guy has a line out, I think Oddessa has been reading every post of this thread and taken the sage advice of Mr. Lupo as well as my own. PS 75 at +125 does not win 100, but you don't need to worry about that because Rivera will not win. |
||||||||||||||
| 7/17/11 8:42 PM | |
sakurabas ear
50
Member Since: 1/13/11 Posts: 97 |
Subbed for the education
|
| 7/17/11 8:50 PM | |
|
jjj2121
Member Since: 6/16/09 Posts: 17295 |
75 at +145 is not $100 either. It's more. Signed, Dude who knows more about this than you. |
| 7/17/11 9:06 PM | |
|
jjj2121
Member Since: 6/16/09 Posts: 17301 |
FreeGSTQ/iLoveThePosterboy -jjj2121 - 75 at +145 is not $100 either. It's more. not even close. |
| 7/17/11 9:15 PM | |
Team GDP
169
Member Since: 12/1/10 Posts: 1280 |
75 at +133 is 99.75 and 75 at +134 is 100.50 |
| 7/17/11 9:18 PM | |
|
jjj2121
Member Since: 6/16/09 Posts: 17303 |
Team GDP - 75 at +133 is 99.75 and 75 at +134 is 100.50 Hey somebody who understands the lines and what they payout,. can you stay for a little bit? Maybe tutor our friend? |
| 7/17/11 9:49 PM | |
Team GDP
169
Member Since: 12/1/10 Posts: 1281 |
jjj2121 -Team GDP - 75 at +133 is 99.75 and 75 at +134 is 100.50 okay this is super secret so everybody keep this on the DL. so if a moneyline is positive ie +150 you turn +150 into a decimal (1.5) by dividing by 100 (150/100 = 1.5). Then you times your bet e.g. $50 by the decimal 1.5 . and you get your profit 75. or you add 1 to the decimal =2.5 and you get your profit + original stake back. (50 x 2.5 = 125) now if a moneyline is negative ie -125 you turn -125 into a decimal (.8) by dividing 100 by the moneyline (100/125 =.8) Then you times your bet e.g. $50 by the decimal 0.8 and you get your profit $40. or you can add 1 to the decimal = 1.8 and you get your profit + original stake back (50 X 1.8 =90) also for a negative moneyline ie -125 you can divide it by 100 = 1.25 then hit the 1/x button on your calculator which will give you 0.8. now if that is too hard you can go to http://www.bestfightodds.com/ in the top right corner there is a dropdown box where it says moneyline, you can click it and change it to decimal (the decimal it gives you is profit + original stake) or you can select "return on" then you enter the amount you wish to bet and it tells you how much you will profit. what is also cool about best fight odds is they have a parlay function where you can see how much you would profit by utilizing a parlay bet. |
| 7/17/11 10:18 PM | |
Bobby Lupo
60
Member Since: 1/12/05 Posts: 31045 |
FreeGSTQ/iLoveThePosterboy - Lupo locks are for chumps and weaselsYou got the big mouth? How we put up $100 each at even odds and I take you money. Sakara makes this thing look easy. I am so sure of this. |
| 7/17/11 10:20 PM | |
|
jjj2121
Edited: 07/17/11 10:21 PM Member Since: 6/16/09 Posts: 17306 |
Bobby Lupo -Mozzaball'd.FreeGSTQ/iLoveThePosterboy - Lupo locks are for chumps and weaselsYou got the big mouth? How we put up $100 each at even odds and I take you money. He won't do it, he never backs up his bullshit. Has been asked to post screen caps of bets, bet cash, he never does. He called me out on a thread looking to bet and tucked before I even got a chance to respond. He fucking tucked on his own callout thread. All show, no go. |
| 7/18/11 12:11 AM | |
Markos
52
Member Since: 5/13/10 Posts: 1828 |
Team GDP -jjj2121 -Team GDP - 75 at +133 is 99.75 and 75 at +134 is 100.50 clean explanation. thanks man |
Reply Post
You must log in to post a reply. Click here to login.






