rufus - 

TruthAboveAll -  Please don't vote for Romney.

Instead of writing a 20 page paper on how he will effectively destroy America I will just say this.

Mitt only cares about protecting the wealth of the top 1% and the Republican views on environmental issues are blissfully ignorant.

I'll keep it short and to the point:  Fuck your stupid face.

TruthAboveAll -  Please don't vote for Romney.

Instead of writing a 20 page paper on how he will effectively destroy America I will just say this.

Mitt only cares about protecting the wealth of the top 1% and the Republican views on environmental issues are blissfully ignorant.

Nah, the top 1% don't need wealth protection. I assure you that Mit Romney is going to remain quite wealthy whether he wins the presidency or not.

Sagiv Lapkin -

TruthAboveAll -  Please don't vote for Romney.

Instead of writing a 20 page paper on how he will effectively destroy America I will just say this.

Mitt only cares about protecting the wealth of the top 1% and the Republican views on environmental issues are blissfully ignorant.

Nah, the top 1% don't need wealth protection. I assure you that Mit Romney is going to remain quite wealthy whether he wins the presidency or not.

TruthAboveAll - 

Sagiv Lapkin -

TruthAboveAll -  Please don't vote for Romney.

Instead of writing a 20 page paper on how he will effectively destroy America I will just say this.

Mitt only cares about protecting the wealth of the top 1% and the Republican views on environmental issues are blissfully ignorant.

Nah, the top 1% don't need wealth protection. I assure you that Mit Romney is going to remain quite wealthy whether he wins the presidency or not.

I agree; I didn't say his mission was necessary. Trickle down economics is essentially a ploy to secure wealth while pretending to redistribute it.

And he knows it's not necessary, ergo that's not his primary objective despite your claims to the contrary.

Munk - "More like a bunch of morons who earn way to little to benefit at all from Romney and the GOP's continued excessive pandering to the upper crust - all wondering what morons did vote Romney that clearly were not in the correct economic status to benefit from it.

The GOP has been playing dumb white people for votes like a harp. It's amazing it still works. "

Still playing the idiot card fromt he past 60 years? LOL. Conservatives play to the private sector and to the fact that this country was built on the idea that a man should actually be able to keep what he earns and not hand it over to a feudal lord. Sad how you want to return to central planning because of your sloth, greed and jealousy.

Also rather funny how government workers who produce nothing are earning more are than the private sector isn't it? How is it you have no problem with Obama's pandering to the wealthy unions, the rich Hollywood crowd and the take care of me ghetto and trailer types? The dems own the poor and stupid and they keep them by fear mongering and lies.

Sagiv Lapkin -

TruthAboveAll - 

Sagiv Lapkin -

TruthAboveAll -  Please don't vote for Romney.

Instead of writing a 20 page paper on how he will effectively destroy America I will just say this.

Mitt only cares about protecting the wealth of the top 1% and the Republican views on environmental issues are blissfully ignorant.

Nah, the top 1% don't need wealth protection. I assure you that Mit Romney is going to remain quite wealthy whether he wins the presidency or not.

I agree; I didn't say his mission was necessary. Trickle down economics is essentially a ploy to secure wealth while pretending to redistribute it.

And he knows it's not necessary, ergo that's not his primary objective despite your claims to the contrary.

theseanster - Barry is still going to win, but I doubt by a huge margin

Chalupa -

rufus - 

TruthAboveAll -  Please don't vote for Romney.

Instead of writing a 20 page paper on how he will effectively destroy America I will just say this.

Mitt only cares about protecting the wealth of the top 1% and the Republican views on environmental issues are blissfully ignorant.

I'll keep it short and to the point:  Fuck your stupid face.

Call him a dick! Call him a dick!

UGCTT_VA757_GJTT - GARY JOHNSON 2012

FUCK OBOMNEY

rufus -

theseanster - Barry is still going to win, but I doubt by a huge margin

Not likely. He's in terrible shape for an incumbent in the last month before the electron. His base is demoralised, late deciders are going to break against him, etc.. .

the_sandman - 

Munk - "More like a bunch of morons who earn way to little to benefit at all from Romney and the GOP's continued excessive pandering to the upper crust - all wondering what morons did vote Romney that clearly were not in the correct economic status to benefit from it.

The GOP has been playing dumb white people for votes like a harp. It's amazing it still works. "

Still playing the idiot card fromt he past 60 years? LOL. Conservatives play to the private sector and to the fact that this country was built on the idea that a man should actually be able to keep what he earns and not hand it over to a feudal lord. Sad how you want to return to central planning because of your sloth, greed and jealousy.

Also rather funny how government workers who produce nothing are earning more are than the private sector isn't it? How is it you have no problem with Obama's pandering to the wealthy unions, the rich Hollywood crowd and the take care of me ghetto and trailer types? The dems own the poor and stupid and they keep them by fear mongering and lies.

I could have picked any one of these to quote - plenty to choose from.

Are you guys idiots?

If your last name is Koch you have a reasonable yet shortsighted and extremely selfish reason to vote for Romney, other than that you are just plain an idiot.

The argument that letting an ultra rich person pay a lessor percentage of taxes than a struggling lower class single parent family creates jobs is a lie. Our economy is driven off consumerism - and that is driven primarily off of the vast majority of people sitting in the middle and lower economic brackets. Windfalls of wealth from biased tax codes do not compel the rich to reinvest in jobs - and even if it did only a portion of those jobs would be stateside. Instead the rich sit on wealth and pass it down to their children creating a rigid and hard to surpass class structure. If you are not already in that structure you are just plain a moron or an extremely wishful thinker to vote like you are. It's that simple.

You are drinking the kool aid - and worse off for it. I'd love to hear a sound argument for continued tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy when the last GOP candidate spent 8 years spending us into oblivion on useless wars that pandered to his defense contractor and big oil supporters. Somebody has to pay more taxes, and the low to middle class cannot. If nobody pays more taxes we have idiotic people in office. If the poor to middle class do it we have cruel and ignorant people in office. Again, that simple.

Romney has not even offered any logical tax argument at all - what are you voting for? More of the same? That is what he has presented - right?

I just don't get people that buy into this crap at all.

I thought the rich paid like 50% of the countries taxes, and the poor pay nothing.

I've never had to pay. Of course I'm single, work, have 2 kids, ect. .

I've seen a thousand people in my situation sit on there butts, play video games, get free housing, free food, free drugs trading for food, work one day a year at labor ready, and get a $5,000 income tax return for simply 'having a child'.

Can someone point me to any statistic that shows that poor people pay any taxes, let alone a greater % than rich people ?

Or even a statistic that shows rich people make up a small % of the country and don't pay the majority  ?

the_sandman - Munk - you are contending my statements and demanding facts while presenting none of your own. No, the government is not effective in doing everything nor am I a "big government" type of guy - but that hardly matters these days because Dubya ran one of the biggest governments in all of history - so there is hardly separation here between the parties. If you are attacking Obamacare as an inefficient government program then you know nothing about how much raw money the insurance companies take in our country while doing literally nothing of value. That system is corrupt and anyone who argues it is some staple of efficiency and providing effective healthcare to all is a total fucking idiot not worth having a dialog with. If anything it's the GOP demands that watered down the offering which made it less effective to retain the pandering we do to large business.

VitorSucked (guess I know what screenname bet you made homey) - when people claim the "rich" pay 50% of the taxes that line is drawn much closer to the middle than the top 1% (like Romney). To have a guy sitting on that type of wealth and using it to effectively dismantle companies rather than provide any value or jobs at all - that is the blueprint for our failed tax code. That guy is paying 10-13% (he would have paid 10% but he paid 3% more in a donation to the church to raise it) - yet I pay closer to 30% sitting in the 250k-1mil/year range as a single professional. How the fuck does that help our country? I personally wouldn't mind if my tax burden was raised - but he DEFINITELY shouldn't mind. He has it to give, those people trying to raise a kid with two working parents pulling less than 100k should be paying 10% - not our fucking billionaires.

New book shows U.S. top earners pay larger share of taxes than any other industrialized nation

Pacquiao vs Klitschkos - We will all have high paying jobs and pay much less for gasoline!

sparkyman - So sad that these two are deemed the best possible people to lead the US.