UnderGround Forum >> Is Joe Lauzon MMA's biggest risk taker?
| 11/6/12 11:08 PM | |
demonsurge
2
Member Since: 6/3/10 Posts: 67 |
I've thought about this more. Melvin Manhoef should be #1 if you're talking about active fighters. |
| 11/6/12 11:13 PM | |
|
Mmanizzle
Member Since: 2/10/09 Posts: 2050 |
I AM A MOFO - Not to mention fights heavy handed and dangerous fighters with little regard for his own chin. Lets guys like Leben tee off freely (not always with good results, lol) as he goes for a plum, etc.. I just saw Leben last week walk into Blazin Steaks on Atkinson for lunch in Honolulu. Fool came in with his shirt off, colored tats, hat on crooked with his hot girlfriend. Dude is lookin' shredded and ready to come back and punch someone... |
| 11/6/12 11:17 PM | |
|
Mix6APlix
Member Since: 10/26/03 Posts: 16464 |
UGCTT_Gaspare - No Nick Diaz??? Agreed. Smoking weed before you know you are going to be tested for it is certainly a big risk. |
| 11/6/12 11:17 PM | |
|
FinestScotch
Member Since: 7/16/12 Posts: 1220 |
List has 3 flaws: Carlos Condit - Show me a risk he took in the Diaz fight. Yes, he NORMALLY takes risks, but there are more than 10 people that take risks EVERY time out. Jon Jones - Takes the fight where it works for him. Took down Vera and smashed him with the quickness, a stand up battle would have been an entertaining risk. Did I mention turning down Chael? Definitely NOT in the top 50 risk takers. Anderson Silva - The gap in class between him and every UFC opponent save Chael 1 has been undeniable. His opponents want to fight on their terms? He just disengages completely. See the Maia fiasco. Wandy, Scott Smith and Robbie Lawler can replace these guys, in nor particular order, or reflection of who they were replacing. |
| 11/6/12 11:18 PM | |
|
I AM A MOFO
Member Since: 3/6/10 Posts: 6130 |
Mmanizzle -I AM A MOFO - How many MMA fighters would take a fight against one of K1's best heavyweights, while NOT a HW themselves (small LHW at best), under SPECIAL rules that basically nullified grappling or winning by ANY method other than KO? Reem's situation wasn't comparable to what Wand did though. Reem is a massive guy who trained and dedicated himself to K1, and mostly fought much smaller guys. That's not the same as a prominent MMA fighter taking a one off striking match against a K1 standout from a higher weight class that goes on their MMA record. |
| 11/6/12 11:24 PM | |
|
Mmanizzle
Edited: 11/06/12 11:24 PM Member Since: 2/10/09 Posts: 2051 |
I hear Kimbo is doing well in pro boxing right now... LOL It was a big risk fighting Seth Petruzelli instead of Frank Shamrock that night... |
| 11/6/12 11:28 PM | |
Leghound
115
Member Since: 10/25/07 Posts: 5443 |
I'd say Nick Diaz is the biggest risk taker in MMA, seems to risk his career with every decision he makes. Missed press conference, loses biggest payday of his life. Busted for weed (again), suspended a year, likely lengthening his path to that payday. |
| 11/6/12 11:30 PM | |
|
Mmanizzle
Member Since: 2/10/09 Posts: 2052 |
I AM A MOFO -Mmanizzle -I AM A MOFO - How many MMA fighters would take a fight against one of K1's best heavyweights, while NOT a HW themselves (small LHW at best), under SPECIAL rules that basically nullified grappling or winning by ANY method other than KO? I am a Wand fan, don't get me wrong, but the guys that Wand obliterated in Pride weren't the most technical strikers, although very exciting to watch. Alot of his wins in Pride were against Japanese fighters not known for their striking ability. Excitement VS Skill - two different things here. |
| 11/6/12 11:38 PM | |
Dazednconfused
68
Member Since: 4/11/11 Posts: 675 |
YellowWrkedByTapIn - Nick and Nate don't do much risk taking, other than taunting when their opponent's backing up. I'd say they're Top 15.As if they don't. They stand in the pocket and trade. That's called risk taking. Not running around the octagon
|
| 11/6/12 11:42 PM | |
fapout
516
Member Since: 1/1/01 Posts: 16394 |
Olaf Alfonso should be on the list. |
| 11/6/12 11:50 PM | |
|
I AM A MOFO
Member Since: 3/6/10 Posts: 6132 |
Mmanizzle -I AM A MOFO -Mmanizzle -I AM A MOFO - How many MMA fighters would take a fight against one of K1's best heavyweights, while NOT a HW themselves (small LHW at best), under SPECIAL rules that basically nullified grappling or winning by ANY method other than KO? Somebody doesn't understand the thread topic. Also, wand's less competitive match ups have nothing to do with anything I mentioned. So wand had a few of fights against "japanese fighters not known for their striking ability"....does that mean he DIDN'T do those other things I mentioned? What does that have to do with anything being discussed? I'm not trying to be a dick but I don't know what point you're trying to make, nor if you realize what thread you're in, lol. Aside from that, wandy fought the best strikers available to him aside from Shogun and Chuck. He even fought the two best pure strikers HW had to offer. He also competed in pure muay thai prior to MMA and Vale Tudo. He certainly faced more and better strikers than his closest competition at the time, Chuck, who also made his big run against grapplers. It was a grappler heavy era in general back then. Again though, it has nothing to do with what I said in my other posts. |
| 11/7/12 6:08 AM | |
shb
2
Member Since: 1/25/07 Posts: 1392 |
demonsurge - I've thought about this more. first thing that came to mind when i saw this thread. also honorable mentions to hideo tokoro, palhares, lavar johnson, hendo, brian bowles, damarques johnson, gilbert yvel |
| 11/7/12 6:19 AM | |
Dazednconfused
68
Member Since: 4/11/11 Posts: 680 |
Risk takers are guys who stand in TNT pocket and bang. Guys like Chris Leben, Nick Diaz, Anderson Silva, ...
|
| 11/7/12 7:59 AM | |
|
youarewhatiswrong
Member Since: 3/23/12 Posts: 1106 |
Lot of guys livin in the past in this thread. |
| 11/7/12 8:43 AM | |
Evzey
75
Member Since: 12/16/10 Posts: 1270 |
Joe is a boss!!
|
| 11/7/12 8:48 AM | |
|
Loco Lobo
Member Since: 4/28/06 Posts: 299 |
Lauzon brings it .... END OF STORY !! |
| 11/7/12 9:35 AM | |
YellowWrkedByTapIn
52
Member Since: 6/9/12 Posts: 3487 |
Dazednconfused -YellowWrkedByTapIn - Nick and Nate don't do much risk taking, other than taunting when their opponent's backing up. I'd say they're Top 15.As if they don't. They stand in the pocket and trade. That's called risk taking. Not running around the octagon Not much of a risk when their striking abilities exceed their opponents'. They get away with the taunting because they're good enough to pull it off. It would be more impressive if someone with lesser boxing skills did that, imo. |
| 11/7/12 9:57 AM | |
|
ALL DAY JAY
Member Since: 7/17/08 Posts: 1190 |
Always love to watch Joe Lauzon fight. Win or lose, it is always a great fight. |
| 11/7/12 9:59 AM | |
Sam Sheridan
11
Member Since: 2/9/04 Posts: 741 |
Love Joe, but I think it's Big Nog |
| 11/7/12 10:30 AM | |
choadler
11
Member Since: 1/5/11 Posts: 2821 |
fapout - Olaf Alfonso should be on the list.Fucking great call. Is he still fighting though? Dude is nuts.
|
| 11/7/12 10:34 AM | |
OnlyTheStrongSurvive
255
Member Since: 1/29/11 Posts: 7944 |
Mix6APlix - In before outrage that Jones is on the list.I'm not outraged but really don't see it. He rarely takes a real risk imo. I think Benson should be on the list, he takes tons of risks on the ground especially, which is why he is always defending submission after submission. Or guys like Leben, Leonard Garcia, etc.
|
| 11/7/12 11:10 AM | |
YVES JOCKSTRAP
78
Member Since: 1/1/01 Posts: 22711 |
Ttt
|
| 11/7/12 12:20 PM | |
|
behrens14
Member Since: 9/14/10 Posts: 295 |
I'm amazed no one has mentioned BJ at all. Guy moves up in weight class often and fights the best of the best there. Fights to finish and has no fear of any opponent. Fought Machida. |
| 11/7/12 12:54 PM | |
bryanand
34
Member Since: 1/1/01 Posts: 30237 |
Joe always goes balls out, and he showed good cardio doing so in his last fight which is an awesome combo. Saku is the ultimate risk taker |
| 11/7/12 1:28 PM | |
YellowWrkedByTapIn
52
Member Since: 6/9/12 Posts: 3488 |
Dazednconfused -YellowWrkedByTapIn - Nick and Nate don't do much risk taking, other than taunting when their opponent's backing up. I'd say they're Top 15.As if they don't. They stand in the pocket and trade. That's called risk taking. Not running around the octagon Not much of a risk when their striking abilities exceed their opponents'. They get away with the taunting because they're good enough to pull it off. It would be more impressive if someone with lesser boxing skills did that, imo. |
Reply Post
You must log in to post a reply. Click here to login.




