PoliticalGround >> 9/11 Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out (Video)

charms434 -  I LOVE when people act like they are experts in controlled demolition on a message board.
"Oh but it looked like a controlled demo!" REALLY? Other than seeing the Flamingo taken down on your 19 inch tv, how many controlled demolitions have u seen?!?........ Get back to bagging my groceries

But it starts to hold weight when demolition experts come out and say the same thing, of which many have.

One view of the 9/11 truther movement:

Larry Appleton -  "The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic."

They say jump and you say "how high" you're brain dead, you got a f-ckin bullet in ya head--RATM

An independent study came to a different conclusion:

yabadaba -

Larry Appleton -  "The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic."

They say jump and you say "how high" you're brain dead, you got a f-ckin bullet in ya head--RATM

An independent study came to a different conclusion:

 

The red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are consistent with a carbon steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments.

 

There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, therefore the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nano-thermite.

 

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?s=01b15521d42447ee42916cd1569f8822&t=231314

"I saw that, it's an obvious yellow/shill study"

What is your level of expertise in chemistry?

It's difficult to pinpoint a precise moment when the popularity of the 9/11 conspiracy theory peaked, though it was probably sometime in 2006. In tracking its decline, however, three dates stand out: July 22, 2004, when the 9/11 Commission released its final report; Feb. 3, 2005, when Popular Mechanics published its 5,500-word article dismantling the movement's claims; and Aug. 21, 2008, when the National Institute of Standards and Technology issued the final portion of a $16 million studyinvestigating the cause of the collapse of the Twin Towers and a third World Trade Center skyscraper that was not hit by a plane.

The Popular Mechanics article...found that all of the supposedly scientific evidence for government involvement in 9/11 was based on shoddy research and, to a large extent, manipulated and misleading argumentation...

Read this thread:

http://www.mixedmartialarts.com/mma.cfm?go=forum_framed.posts&forum=2&thread=2034310&page=1&pc=437

Then wipe your ass with this one.

Of course the popularity of people wanting the truth wained after a few years, for one, the public has very short memories and secondly, when they constantly hit a brick wall whenever they demand answers from official sources, and are ridiculed by elements of the mainstream media, only the truly dedicated will keep pushing.

The perpetrators of 9/11 knew this when they pulled it off. All they had to do was look at history. 

THE DEAN - Personally, I don't think jet fuel burns hot enough to take down a building like that.

Kerosene gets pretty hot bro.

Redneck - 

THE DEAN - Personally, I don't think jet fuel burns hot enough to take down a building like that.

 

Kerosene gets pretty hot bro.

 

THE DEAN - 

Redneck - 

THE DEAN - Personally, I don't think jet fuel burns hot enough to take down a building like that.

 

 

Kerosene gets pretty hot bro.

 

 

Not hot enough to burn through a terrorist passport.

As far as I know, plastic burns at a much lower temperature.

The coincidence theorists have an answer for that, I don't recall what it is off-hand, but they believe it.

Redneck - 

THE DEAN - 

Redneck - 

THE DEAN - Personally, I don't think jet fuel burns hot enough to take down a building like that.

 

 

Kerosene gets pretty hot bro.

 

 

Not hot enough to burn through a terrorist passport.

As far as I know, plastic burns at a much lower temperature.

 

The coincidence theorists have an answer for that, I don't recall what it is off-hand, but they believe it.

 

I believe the answer is "This stuff's complex bro."

Late on the night of August 23, 2001, at about 3 a.m. security cameras in the parking garage of the World Trade Center captured the arrival of two or three truck vans.

Visual examination determined the vans were separate and unique from trucks used by janitorial services, including different colors and devoid of markings. More curious, all the janitorial trucks had pulled out of the Towers by about 2:30 a.m—about half an hour before the second set of vans arrived.

According to my high level State Department source with a top security clearance, who disclosed the unusual nightly activity, no vans matching that description had entered the World Trade Center at such an hour in any of the weeks or months prior to that date. It was a unique event.

Security cameras caught the vans leaving the Towers at approximately 5 a.m—before the first wave of AAA personality types on Wall Street, driving Mercedes and BMWs, arrived to track the markets.

For the next 10 to 12 nights, the same mysterious truck vans arrived at the World Trade Center at the same mysterious hour--- after the janitorial crews had left the building and before the most fanatic robber barons on Wall Street showed up for work. The vans appeared at the World Trade Center from approximately August 23, 2001 until September 3 or 4, 2001. After that last night, they never appeared at the Towers again.

The vans were never heard of again, either. The 9/11 Commission was never informed of their surprising presence in the Towers three weeks before the 9/11 attack. Most of the 9/11 Truth Community has no knowledge of this extraordinary nightly activity, either.

charms434 -  I LOVE when people act like they are experts in controlled demolition on a message board.
"Oh but it looked like a controlled demo!" REALLY? Other than seeing the Flamingo taken down on your 19 inch tv, how many controlled demolitions have u seen?!?........ Get back to bagging my groceries

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sK50So-yYRU

Here are 70 building implosions.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SUuBXRQyXk

Here is a video of a 5 story building collapsing from a fire.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbff_Ol-izY

and finally, a very scary video of building demolitions side by side with 911 footage.

Vitor29 -  Lol @ calling people "9/11 deniers", I don't ever recall anyone saying the events of 9/11 didn't take place, ever. Of course we all know the term "denier" is usually used to invoke a connection with holocaust denial. Not only is that a dirty tactic, it's a moronic tactic and not even close to being accurate.

Yeah, and now denier is used for the same reason to slur people who don't accept the climate change theory, the term has a stigma attached to it.