UnderGround Forum >> Okay, seriously? The Shogun-Rua fight judging

| Share | Email | Subscribe | Check IPs

12/9/12 12:12 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
The Overseer 142 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 10/16/12
Posts: 1486
 

is fucking WHAT THE FUCK. 30-27 and 30-26?!

Okay Rua may have lost, but in absolutely no way does his performance justify that kind of score. What in the serious actual fuck, the scoring should've been 29-28 all across the board.

I'm pissed and gonna go smoke a bowl. Fuck. Phone Post
12/9/12 12:15 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
RKing85 52 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/1/01
Posts: 16052
30-26 was wrong.

30-27 is fine though.

Rounds 2 and 3 clearly went to the Swede, round 1 was close and you could make a case for either fighter.

29-28 and 30-27 are both perfectly acceptable scores.
12/9/12 12:16 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
YourMomMadeMeTap Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 6/6/12
Posts: 296
Shogun-Rua was a ridiculous judging111
12/9/12 12:16 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
The Overseer 142 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 10/16/12
Posts: 1487
RKing85 - 30-26 was wrong.

30-27 is fine though.

Rounds 2 and 3 clearly went to the Swede, round 1 was close and you could make a case for either fighter.

29-28 and 30-27 are both perfectly acceptable scores.
I could accept 30-27 for the 3rd round just because of the takedowns and striking of Gus, but the other two rounds were 29-28. It makes me mad, seriously Phone Post
12/9/12 12:17 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
mmavixen 734 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 12/28/10
Posts: 6547

30-26 was downright insane.

12/9/12 12:17 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
The Overseer 142 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 10/16/12
Posts: 1488
Wu Massacre - which round do you think he won though? 1 or 2 ? i thought both of those were very close but gus took them. i could see an argument being made for either, and it is probably the fight ill be looking to rewatch first from this card


i thought siver - phan, crunk-martinez, shogun-gus, were the most deserving of fotn though

MAYBE round 1, and he kept pace and such in the 2nd. He didn't win rounds 2 and 3, but he didn't get insanely dominated like the score implies. It's bullshit. Phone Post
12/9/12 12:21 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
UGCTT_LastCall 22 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 7/21/03
Posts: 8552
If my Swedish brethren won rounds 1 and 2 by a score of 10-9...there's no reason round 3 shouldn't have been 10-8.

I have spoken.
12/9/12 12:25 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
The Overseer 142 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 10/16/12
Posts: 1489
Wu Massacre - i agree, round 1 and 2 were neck and neck, but i think gus won both, although from what i remember round 1 shogun might have won. gus landed more shots in 1 but shogun landed harder and had the sub attempt. in 2 shogun landed more but gus landed some nice knees and takedowns.


well if you look at the rules its fairly clear how, they thought he overwhelmingly dominated, which is what happened, but its true the refs suck and should be replaced by people who trane
I think the judges paid an insane amount of attention to the takedowns.

So dumb. Phone Post
12/9/12 12:27 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
The Overseer 142 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 10/16/12
Posts: 1490
Wu Massacre - ya the judges i meant but you got it anyways, but uhhh... some of the tds were pretty nice and effective, some good sweeps, they were hard tds not soft ones, and there was some gnp... i thought they scored it well, but overall, judging sux
The takedowns in the 3rd round by Gus were damn impressive, which is why I'd accept a 30-27 or 30-26, is because Shogun didn't do anything in the 3rd, but the 1st and 2nd were 29-28 rounds Phone Post
12/9/12 12:41 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
ortman166 25 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 11/28/10
Posts: 5613
The Overseer -
RKing85 - 30-26 was wrong.

30-27 is fine though.

Rounds 2 and 3 clearly went to the Swede, round 1 was close and you could make a case for either fighter.

29-28 and 30-27 are both perfectly acceptable scores.
I could accept 30-27 for the 3rd round just because of the takedowns and striking of Gus, but the other two rounds were 29-28. It makes me mad, seriously Phone Post
Lol...? Phone Post
12/9/12 12:41 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
ortman166 25 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 11/28/10
Posts: 5614
Trolling?^ Phone Post
12/9/12 12:50 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
mghan44 1 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 3/11/09
Posts: 268
The Overseer - 
Wu Massacre - ya the judges i meant but you got it anyways, but uhhh... some of the tds were pretty nice and effective, some good sweeps, they were hard tds not soft ones, and there was some gnp... i thought they scored it well, but overall, judging sux
The takedowns in the 3rd round by Gus were damn impressive, which is why I'd accept a 30-27 or 30-26, is because Shogun didn't do anything in the 3rd, but the 1st and 2nd were 29-28 rounds Phone Post

I'm sensing troll in this post and your previous one. If not you need to go revise how scoring works round by round.

Anyway, I feel opposite about the scoring. HOPEFULLY this represents a trend of judges scoring fights in a manner that will HUGELY diminish the prevalence of fucked decisions in the UFC. Don't see why so many people think a 10-8 round should be reserved for when a fighter is near finished.

10-9 goes to a VERY close round that could legitimately go either way.
10-8 goes to a round with a clear cut winner, regardless of near finishes or total dominance. Any round without argument as to the winner should be 10-8.
10-7 goes to a round which is now generally considered at 10-8 by most people.



12/9/12 12:52 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Salt the Snail 11 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 11/25/10
Posts: 940
I honestly thought Shogun won the first 2 rounds barely. Gustaffson had the most dominant round in round 3. Either way that fight could have gone either way and the judges fucked up.
12/9/12 11:17 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
ortman166 25 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 11/28/10
Posts: 5616
Salt the Snail - I honestly thought Shogun won the first 2 rounds barely. Gustaffson had the most dominant round in round 3. Either way that fight could have gone either way and the judges fucked up.
What? I wanted shogun but he lost, obviously. Phone Post
12/9/12 11:21 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Eisenberg Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 12/09/12 11:22 AM
Member Since: 11/8/11
Posts: 715
Shogun won the 1st round...when he fell it really was a slip not a legit knockdown. He then reversed Gus, had a dangerous sub attempt and later landed the most significant strikes of the round (hard knee, right hand that dropped Gus).

Gus won the other 2 rounds no question, even though it was mostly due to point takedowns making Shogun gas.

29-28 Gus.
12/9/12 11:22 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Pork Sword Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 9/7/11
Posts: 2989
The first fight I showed up for was scored 30-26, 30-25, 30-24 I'm pretty sure. Crazy loose judging all night as far as 10-8s go.
12/9/12 11:26 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
ufc98newb 37 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 9/26/10
Posts: 1745

lol. this guy trying really hard to troll and nobody is biting. or is just really REALLY dumb

12/9/12 11:31 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
w9 Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 12/20/10
Posts: 494
Rua won rounds 1 & 2.

UFC judging is a joke.
12/9/12 11:50 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Rear Naked Chode 174 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 11/20/12
Posts: 204
The Overseer - 
RKing85 - 30-26 was wrong.

30-27 is fine though.

Rounds 2 and 3 clearly went to the Swede, round 1 was close and you could make a case for either fighter.

29-28 and 30-27 are both perfectly acceptable scores.
I could accept 30-27 for the 3rd round just because of the takedowns and striking of Gus, but the other two rounds were 29-28. It makes me mad, seriously Phone Post

I think you're confused. Unless you're adding all three judges score together in a round.

I had shogun winning the first 10-9 but Gus won the 2nd and 3rd 10-9. 29-28 Gus.
12/9/12 11:57 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
FreakDaddy 85 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 12/09/12 11:57 AM
Member Since: 1/1/01
Posts: 6016
RKing85 - 30-26 was wrong.

30-27 is fine though.

Rounds 2 and 3 clearly went to the Swede, round 1 was close and you could make a case for either fighter.

29-28 and 30-27 are both perfectly acceptable scores.

This is how an objective person would see the fight.....I have no idea how anyone would have a 10-8 round in that fight....Round one was very close and could have went either way, so I could see how 30/27 and 29/28 could have been scored for Gus......
12/9/12 12:01 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
mikerobmma 30 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 9/2/11
Posts: 471
Wu Massacre - they called a bunch of 10-8s during the fight

which, isnt far from what the rules actually call for

i could see how round 3 was a 10-8 round



"a round is to be scored as a 10-10 round when both contestants appear to be fighting evenly and neither contestant shows clear dominance in a round; (I think this needs to be called a lot more)

a round is to be scored as a 10-9 round when a contestant wins by a close margin, landing the greater number of effective legal strikes, grappling and other maneuvers;

a round is to be scored as a 10-8 round when a contestant overwhelmingly dominates by striking or grappling in a round.

a round is to be scored as a 10-7 round when a contestant totally dominates by striking or grappling in a round."
Overwhelming?

Lol, wut..... Phone Post
12/9/12 12:03 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
mrgoodarmbar 34 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 11/10/05
Posts: 3078
guys nearly get killed and they invariably score it 10-9... and now they decide to pull out the 8 for one of those rounds?
12/9/12 12:05 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
UGCTT_ Lay'n'PrayNINJA Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 5/13/11
Posts: 15394

Take who the fighters are out of the equation.

 

For YEARS it has sucked that the judges NEVER used 10-8's for dominant rounds. I was happy to see Washington's judges actually using the scoring system the way it was intended. So many 10-8s, even if some are controvercial, is only going to make the scoring system better. 

 

Just like Penn-Fitch was rightfully a draw, you could argue round 3 of this fight a 10-8. The owrding does not call for a near finish, only domination of the round. 

12/9/12 12:20 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
the geek 476 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 12/2/07
Posts: 5036
mmavixen - 

30-26 was downright insane.


Yup yup, Shogun lost but not 30-26.
12/9/12 12:24 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
mghan44 1 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 3/11/09
Posts: 271
UGCTT_ Lay'n'PrayNINJA - 

Take who the fighters are out of the equation.

 

For YEARS it has sucked that the judges NEVER used 10-8's for dominant rounds. I was happy to see Washington's judges actually using the scoring system the way it was intended. So many 10-8s, even if some are controvercial, is only going to make the scoring system better. 

 

Just like Penn-Fitch was rightfully a draw, you could argue round 3 of this fight a 10-8. The owrding does not call for a near finish, only domination of the round. 


I have been saying this for years as well. You are voted up for sensibility.

| Share | Email | Subscribe | Check IPs

Reply Post

You must log in to post a reply. Click here to login.

ad