UnderGround Forum >> Who Boxed better?
| 12/13/12 2:23 AM | |
|
kingkoopa
Member Since: 1/1/12 Posts: 1036 |
Who had better boxing against Bendo? Frankie or Nate: who threw better hands?
|
| 12/13/12 3:00 AM | |
btx35
76
Member Since: 10/20/12 Posts: 684 |
Frankie did everything better |
| 12/13/12 3:03 AM | |
caseharts
324
Member Since: 7/18/11 Posts: 12924 |
Frankie clearly.
|
| 12/13/12 3:07 AM | |
Strugglezworth
9
Member Since: 8/19/12 Posts: 269 |
Is this serious? |
| 12/13/12 3:11 AM | |
ender852
62
Member Since: 9/10/10 Posts: 2392 |
the question should be: "Who has better wrestling so they have a chance to box and not be on their back, Frankie or Nate?" |
| 12/13/12 3:49 AM | |
Dazednconfused
69
Member Since: 4/11/11 Posts: 913 |
AresSmashedPrahjuhdee - OP has down syndrome, take it easy guys.Lol people never cease to amaze me on here. Did OP watch the fights?
|
| 12/13/12 4:20 AM | |
|
Frankie Emelianenko
Member Since: 11/14/12 Posts: 73 |
LMFAO
|
| 12/13/12 4:38 AM | |
|
kingkoopa
Member Since: 1/1/12 Posts: 1040 |
Diaz didn't really get too many opportunities to throw his hands but when he did how did he do compared to Edgar? Not that hard to understand
|
| 12/13/12 4:44 AM | |
|
RobinHood
Member Since: 7/25/10 Posts: 2323 |
Frankie is the shits. Aldo is getting smashed and then Frankie will return to 155 and take back his belts.
|
| 12/13/12 5:43 AM | |
|
Hikikomori
Member Since: 11/23/11 Posts: 899 |
Edgar the has footwork for days.
|
| 12/13/12 5:50 AM | |
kano350chevy
6
Member Since: 7/15/11 Posts: 178 |
Did Nate throw a punch standing?
|
| 12/13/12 10:25 AM | |
DezzNutzz
51
Member Since: 6/26/12 Posts: 674 |
kingkoopa - Who had better boxing against Bendo?
|
| 12/13/12 10:40 AM | |
|
UGSlapshot
Member Since: 10/21/12 Posts: 316 |
kingkoopa - Diaz didn't really get too many opportunities to throw his hands but when he did how did he do compared to Edgar?He didn't get as many opportunitys because he's not as good of a fighter and couldn't implement is game plan as well as Frankie Edgar. Its a stupid question.
|
| 12/13/12 11:21 AM | |
ranier wolfcastle
248
Member Since: 11/28/03 Posts: 59210 |
frankie vs nate woulda been interesting stylistically |
| 12/13/12 11:24 AM | |
MostLegit
21
Member Since: 9/24/11 Posts: 642 |
Well this thread is retarded.
|
| 12/13/12 11:40 AM | |
|
kingkoopa
Member Since: 1/1/12 Posts: 1043 |
UGSlapshot -Lol I'm talking about boxing alone. I'm not talking about overall fighter or overall performance. Obviously Frankie used better grappling/wrestling to make it a more competitive fight. You guys are hilariously dumb to think I'm talking about the overall fight. I clearly said boxingkingkoopa - Diaz didn't really get too many opportunities to throw his hands but when he did how did he do compared to Edgar?He didn't get as many opportunitys because he's not as good of a fighter and couldn't implement is game plan as well as Frankie Edgar. Youre basically saying Frankie is a better fighter so he has better boxing. moronic response. Jones is a better fighter than belfort but belfort has better boxing. Then there's other people suggesting I change the question to who has better Wrestling? Obviously Frankie which is why I said Boxing. Yes there were moments Nate got to box. He wasn't going for takedowns or pulling guard like belfort. Question is about boxing alone, not grappling, not wrestling, not who's a better fighter, not who performed better. This is obvious because I asked about Boxing I guess no one here knows what "throwing hands" is lol wow I guess no one has rewatched the fight either. the footwork response is a decent response cuz foot work applies to boxing. I ask because crap load of people claim Nate has the best boxing in the lower weight classes. There are people that think nate would "box up" Frankie.
|
| 12/13/12 12:08 PM | |
SonofJockstrap
2
Member Since: 7/18/12 Posts: 719 |
^Frankie would handle Nate, what's your point op? |
Reply Post
You must log in to post a reply. Click here to login.






