OtherGround Forum >> Special Audit From The State *Question*
| 12/28/12 11:51 PM | |
Fighting
145
Member Since: 11/19/05 Posts: 15413 |
I bought a boat from a guy that had a value of say 14K. He and I made our agreement and I paid cash for it. On the title he told me to put whatever I want, he was cool with it. He said he did the same thing when he bought it. So, I may or may not have fudged the numbers. I get a letter saying I got a special state audit and they claim I didn't pay what he and I said. They want me to prove I it? How in the hell can I prove it? How can they prove it? Can they look at my bank records, or better yet would they? They say prove it or pay what the true value of the boat was. Who's to say I didn't suck this guy off every tuesday of the month to compensate? |
| 12/28/12 11:57 PM | |
Authority Figure
443
Member Since: 7/10/11 Posts: 8182 |
They probably already audited him, which is how they found out about you. There is no other way. They can't see your bank records until they officially open audit case against you. At this point, you shouldn't lie. Unless you want to be heavily fined, go to court, or go to jail over a fucking boat. I'd go see the guy in person. Don't call him. Don't email him. Ask him if he's been audited. Then google the boat and year and see if your claim matches what others are saying its worth. |
| 12/29/12 12:10 AM | |
|
rufus
Member Since: 2/25/03 Posts: 44141 |
There's a blue book sort of valuation for boats. Some states will run the boat 's (or car) reported sale price versus the blue book value. If it's way low, it will get flagged in their system. That could have happened to you. I'd just fess up and pay them, otherwise they're going to be in your bank account and then they'll drop the hammer on you.
|
| 12/29/12 12:12 AM | |
Fighting
145
Member Since: 11/19/05 Posts: 15416 |
It seems likely I am screwed. I could get the guy to corroborate, but I sold the boat for what they are saying I should have bought it for. Kinda backed into a corner. I shall pay them. I should have all along, and I would have but the guy persuaded me. thanks OG |
| 12/29/12 12:15 AM | |
Authority Figure
443
Edited: 12/29/12 12:14 AM Member Since: 7/10/11 Posts: 8190 |
We love you, we'll write every week I promise. don't drop the soap.
Just kidding. |
| 12/29/12 12:15 AM | |
Retired Douchebag
20
Member Since: 4/1/09 Posts: 6877 |
Say he owed you money for something (consulting services...hired work, etc), and you paid him the difference after he offered the boat. Explain to whoever you talked to that the large sum of money was for gambling, which you subsequently lost. |
| 12/29/12 12:18 AM | |
Authority Figure
443
Member Since: 7/10/11 Posts: 8192 |
Retired Douchebag - The first half of your suggestion sounds good. But what if gambling isn't legal in his state? What if they want him to prove he visited said casino? |
| 12/29/12 12:22 AM | |
Mayfield
24
Member Since: 1/1/01 Posts: 5483 |
The boat was not in working condission when you bought it. You paid x amount for it. Any other money you spent was to get it opperational.
|
| 12/29/12 2:18 AM | |
Retired Douchebag
20
Member Since: 4/1/09 Posts: 6880 |
Authority Figure -Retired Douchebag - Gambling is legal in 48 states, in some form or another. How do I know? I work in this industry. The last two hold outs are Utah and Hawaii. I didn't need to google this info. As for gambling excuses, a lot of our top players always discuss the legalities of their gambling losses. Having worked in management, we are forced to take classes about this subject. Whilst casinos are held responsible to track losses, they are only supposed to do so if the amount is over $3,000. A jackpot is only considered if it is won and is over $1,200. But that is within a 24 hour period. Furthermore, no guest is required to sign up for 'player's club card,' also called "player tracking" on the casino side. The player tracking records track the entire year, and lifetime, that a guest has been to that property. But again, no guest is required by state or federal law, to sign up for this card. Something you probably don't know about modern surveillance systems is that most properties opt to hold only 14 days worth of video evidence on their servers. Past 14 days and the hard drives containing this evidence is 'maintenanced' by the system and deleted, unless there was a saved surveillance video by the surveillance department (usually for counseling, or writing up an employee fuck up, or criminal investigation with local/state/federal authorities). In this way, there is no way to prove or disprove that OP was at the casino. |
| 12/29/12 2:43 AM | |
McFly
1
Member Since: 7/18/05 Posts: 2977 |
Retired Douchebag -Damn interesting postAuthority Figure -Retired Douchebag -
|
| 12/29/12 2:47 AM | |
|
rufus
Member Since: 2/25/03 Posts: 44146 |
If this is over a few hundred bucks, I wouldn't fuck with them. Not going to be worth your time or effort to have them crawling up your ass. Especially when you're NOT going to have any documentation that will satisfy them (like the boat was trashed and you have $5000 in receipts to refurbish it). |
| 12/29/12 2:51 AM | |
|
rufus
Member Since: 2/25/03 Posts: 44147 |
Say he owed you money for something (consulting services...hired work, etc), They're going to say, "Neither of you have receipts or records of any of those services rendered?" Fuck, even old handy men I've used to do work around my house always had me sign a work order. That shit won't fly. Not worth the trouble for what I assume is a few hundred bucks. |
| 12/29/12 5:29 AM | |
Dougie
466
Member Since: 8/20/03 Posts: 99285 |
Mayfield - The boat was not in working condission when you bought it. You paid x amount for it. Any other money you spent was to get it opperational. This. |
| 12/29/12 9:31 AM | |
Retired Douchebag
20
Member Since: 4/1/09 Posts: 6882 |
rufus - You don't need to keep receipts unless you're a business, and even still, those receipts are easy to fake. If you are a private entity, or private citizen conducting services rendered, all you need is an oral contract. |
| 12/29/12 9:34 AM | |
Fighting
145
Member Since: 11/19/05 Posts: 15425 |
rufus - The difference they want is 700.00. |
| 12/29/12 9:35 AM | |
Retired Douchebag
20
Member Since: 4/1/09 Posts: 6883 |
Dougie -Mayfield - The boat was not in working condission when you bought it. You paid x amount for it. Any other money you spent was to get it opperational. This sounds fairly legit as well :) |
| 12/29/12 10:13 AM | |
OnCall
14
Member Since: 3/15/06 Posts: 1810 |
What are the penalties if you get caught lying? |
| 12/29/12 10:20 AM | |
WidespreadPanic
277
Member Since: 12/29/06 Posts: 8507 |
Fighting -rufus - Pay it. Don't lie. Good luck. (base cost of a lawyer is $500).
|
| 12/29/12 11:00 AM | |
Sandy Pantz
58
Member Since: 2/4/07 Posts: 14693 |
Government may seem incompetent on most everything else, but they are pretty good at getting in your pocket. I'd just pay up if I was you. |
| 12/29/12 3:47 PM | |
|
baj54
Member Since: 8/7/12 Posts: 545 |
So is this a tax issue then? Are they asking you to repay the difference of what you said you paid and what he sold it to you for? Is it $700 in taxes or $700 in the value of the object(boat)? The govt can't tell you what you can and cannot buy something for, they can ask for back taxes on unpaid items. If you've never fudged your taxes and have no skeletons in your closet don't pay it. If not an issue of back taxes on services rendered because it's an item of sale. Did you pay in cash or write a check for the item?
|
Reply Post
You must log in to post a reply. Click here to login.



