UnderGround Forum >> WarMachine accusing Lloyd Irvin of rape

| Share | Email | Subscribe | Check IPs

1/10/13 7:11 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
WoodenPupa 56 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 7/24/02
Posts: 7325
The noodle-defense maybe confused the jurors as to an application of attempted force? Maybe he said he didn't even touch her. But still.
1/10/13 7:13 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
DanEzra 15 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 01/10/13 7:14 PM
Member Since: 3/19/09
Posts: 1045
MTH - 
WoodenPupa - Anyway, this stuff is very confusing to a layman. What does "forcible sodomy" mean if not rape?

And then later in the article it says:

. . . . I wonder how he ended up being one of the merely 2 out of the entire 7 that got accused.

 

 

Generally, "rape" refers to forcible vaginal penetration, whereas "sodomy" refers to forcible penetration elsewhere.  I'm sure Wikipedia has articles that provide more technical distinctions if you care to look.

 

 

There could be a few explanations for why the other five participants weren't tried like Irvin and Gatling.  The most likely is that they pleaded guilty, so no trial was required for them. 

 

This is the current criminal code, not sure what it was in 1990.

§ 18.2-61. Rape.

A. If any person has sexual intercourse with a complaining witness, whether or not his or her spouse, or causes a complaining witness, whether or not his or her spouse, to engage in sexual intercourse with any other person and such act is accomplished (i) against the complaining witness's will, by force, threat or intimidation of or against the complaining witness or another person; or (ii) through the use of the complaining witness's mental incapacity or physical helplessness; or (iii) with a child under age 13 as the victim, he or she shall be guilty of rape.

http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+18.2-61

==========================================================

§ 18.2-67.1. Forcible sodomy.

A. An accused shall be guilty of forcible sodomy if he or she engages in cunnilingus, fellatio, anilingus, or anal intercourse with a complaining witness whether or not his or her spouse, or causes a complaining witness, whether or not his or her spouse, to engage in such acts with any other person, and

1. The complaining witness is less than 13 years of age; or

2. The act is accomplished against the will of the complaining witness, by force, threat or intimidation of or against the complaining witness or another person, or through the use of the complaining witness's mental incapacity or physical helplessness.

http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+18.2-67.1

 
1/10/13 7:20 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
WoodenPupa 56 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 7/24/02
Posts: 7326
It looks like we nearly converged on the same code Ezra. So it looks like 18.2-67.5 includes an "attempted" distinction, but I won't pretend to understand it in proper legal context.
1/10/13 7:21 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
SinCityHustler Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/1/01
Posts: 11461
Bootsy Collins - 
Timothyk - 
2JupitersTooMany - 
Timothyk - Do you really think this girl went over to hang out with a bunch of dudes, and not have sex with any of them? Do you know how many girls have trains run on them? Or like to be hit while fucked? Or lie about rape to soothe parent anger?

what a gentleman


My fiance thinks I am quite so.

If she knows what's good for her....

Actually a fiance' is a man.  So he's engaged to marry a man, (a he).  

1/10/13 7:33 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
2JupitersTooMany 641 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 5/14/06
Posts: 31761
WoodenPupa - It looks like we nearly converged on the same code Ezra. So it looks like 18.2-67.5 includes an "attempted" distinction, but I won't pretend to understand it in proper legal context.
Looks like I have no idea what I'm talking about. Phone Post
1/10/13 7:35 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Stache 14 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 10/16/10
Posts: 5640
Mark Hunter - OK, just one more attorney to chime in. How about this: None of us were in the room that night, so none of us on this thread have a clue what happened. Maybe the girl was telling the whole truth . . . maybe she wasn't. Same for the guys, including Lloyd Irvin. Bottom line: we have no clue.

Since we can't know, and Lloyd Irvin was not convicted, then perhaps this is a good time to wind this post down. I'm sure, if Lloyd Irvin could, he'd go back in time and handle that night differently. He can't . . . let's move on. Just a thought.

Since when is one required to be present at a crime to pass judgement on it? Isn't that what judges, juries and the legal system, in general, are for?

I thought lawyers were trained in logic.
1/10/13 7:37 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
WoodenPupa 56 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 7/24/02
Posts: 7327
Sometimes a football comes out of left field...whattya gonna do? *Sopranos shrug*
1/10/13 7:54 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
2JupitersTooMany 641 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 5/14/06
Posts: 31763
superCalo - If it was done in the dark but lyold irvin the black man got accused, guy shouldnt smile in those circumstances Phone Post
lol Phone Post
1/10/13 8:03 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Madrugadao Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 5/22/11
Posts: 432
I appreciate playing devils advocate is not popular here but I am a little unclear on what is going on.

Was he tried for a crime and found innocent?
Or, was he just innocent of rape but guilty of something else?
1/10/13 8:11 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
cheesesteak 133 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 11/23/02
Posts: 3527
Madrugadao - I appreciate playing devils advocate is not popular here but I am a little unclear on what is going on.

Was he tried for a crime and found innocent?
Or, was he just innocent of rape but guilty of something else?

from the articles I have read it seems that he was tied for a crime and found innocent. However, the reason he was innocent seems to be because when he was up at bat at the gang rape he couldn't perform....This is what I am gathering so far...I think it would be wise for Lloyd to make a statement and clear this up if this is incorrect....
1/10/13 8:30 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
cheesesteak 133 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 11/23/02
Posts: 3528
He obviously has his eyes on his twitter and FB like a hawk. I doubt he will be sleeping anytime soon trying to moderate that shit...

Dude it's out there. Why don't you just come out and explain what happened instead of everyone in the mma/bjj community wondering if you have a gang raping mentality. Make a statement you turkey! You can't just sit there erasing negative comments of your twitter forever and hope we all forget tomorrow...It's serious shit and you need to explain if you want to continue to Don Lepre peoples asses at seminars and strut around in your expensive suits flossin and shit
1/10/13 8:32 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
TylerA Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 12/27/11
Posts: 41
Mark Hunter - OK, just one more attorney to chime in. How about this: None of us were in the room that night, so none of us on this thread have a clue what happened. Maybe the girl was telling the whole truth . . . maybe she wasn't. Same for the guys, including Lloyd Irvin. Bottom line: we have no clue.

Since we can't know, and Lloyd Irvin was not convicted, then perhaps this is a good time to wind this post down. I'm sure, if Lloyd Irvin could, he'd go back in time and handle that night differently. He can't . . . let's move on. Just a thought.

Have to agree. No one knows for sure what happened, unfortunately. People lie all the time so either side could be telling the truth. Plus, it never ceases to surprise me what intoxicated people are capable of.
1/10/13 8:41 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
JasonSB Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 12/26/09
Posts: 121
I'm confused as well. So they say he didn't participate (limpness), but was at least there during the gang rape? Correct.? If that's the case isn't this the same as saying he was aware there was a gang rape (a crime) taking place @ the residence where he was @. If so does the legal system not have something to charge him with since he was aware of a crime taking place even if he himself claimed to not have taken part in any of the criminal acts. I'm super confused.
1/10/13 9:06 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Stache 14 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 10/16/10
Posts: 5641
JasonSB - I'm confused as well. So they say he didn't participate (limpness), but was at least there during the gang rape? Correct.? If that's the case isn't this the same as saying he was aware there was a gang rape (a crime) taking place @ the residence where he was @. If so does the legal system not have something to charge him with since he was aware of a crime taking place even if he himself claimed to not have taken part in any of the criminal acts. I'm super confused.

I'm no lawyer but I imagine that it would depend on the laws of the jurisdiction where the crime took place. Different regions would have different standards for legal duty of care.
1/10/13 9:23 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
HELWIG Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 5/28/03
Posts: 67877

Call me a jerkoff but there shouldnt be ANY tolerance or rationalization of this kind of shit.

Rape, child molesting, all forms of deviant sexuality.

Its not "oh a mistake". Its ruining someone for life.

1/10/13 9:42 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
burner22 7 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 8/17/12
Posts: 631
HELWIG -

Call me a jerkoff but there shouldnt be ANY tolerance or rationalization of this kind of shit.

Rape, child molesting, all forms of deviant sexuality.

Its not "oh a mistake". Its ruining someone for life.

Agree 100% Phone Post
1/10/13 9:53 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Drugs_Delaney 26 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 8/19/09
Posts: 8309
burner22 - 
HELWIG -

Call me a jerkoff but there shouldnt be ANY tolerance or rationalization of this kind of shit.

Rape, child molesting, all forms of deviant sexuality.

Its not "oh a mistake". Its ruining someone for life.

Agree 100% Phone Post

but these women are just asking for it, looking for a good time an such.

-the UG/OG scumbags

1/10/13 10:04 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Hargreaves 13 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 01/10/13 10:17 PM
Member Since: 10/15/06
Posts: 821
.
1/10/13 10:15 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
LittleC Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/1/01
Posts: 3014
Wow. A ten page thread about a guy who DIDNT fuck somebody 20 years ago. And somehow that translates into him promoting rape within the academy.

1/10/13 10:17 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
aboveandbeyond 1 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 5/1/10
Posts: 1413
This place is worse than an Indian bus after sun down. It's like some of you have this visceral reaction of "that fucking worthless whore deserved it" whenever you hear the word rape.

In regards to the article, this is all I needed to read right here: "Irvin walked free, not because he did the right thing and refused to have sex with a 17-year-old. He testified that he wanted to have intercourse with her but couldn't".

Of course there is a degree of speculation to this, and I know the hackneyed, knee-jerk arguments defense attorneys spit out (especially when the case is bad). I was an assistant public defender. If there is one thing public defenders get experience in, it's taking loser cases to trial and crossing your fingers. I'm not Clarence Darrow, but I have a decent feel for when a case is desperate.

If you're the defendant, and you're testifying that you WANTED to have sex with the victim in a rape trial, you're in a bad fucking spot. Why would he state that? Again speculation, but my guess is pretty damning evidence against him.

He was stuck in a fully extended armbar, and got out with the hitch hike escape.
1/10/13 10:29 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Hargreaves 13 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 01/11/13 1:16 PM
Member Since: 10/15/06
Posts: 822
.
1/10/13 10:39 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
shinbang Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 3/17/11
Posts: 441
Timothyk - Do you really think this girl went over to hang out with a bunch of dudes, and not have sex with any of them? Do you know how many girls have trains run on them? Or like to be hit while fucked? Or lie about rape to soothe parent anger?

absolutely speechless
1/10/13 10:54 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
alkysmurf 26 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 2/7/09
Posts: 1618
So this guy is put in a bad situation at a party when he is 20 and most likely drinking. he deflects his way out of participating, and then seems to have cooperated with authorities, I assume he also completed any sentencing requirements for any other charges. Meaning he has served any time for any crime that he was guilty of, in my eyes he is a free man. According to the judge society is repaid.

Now, possibly as a result of what he personally seen happen to women, he teaches them how to protect themselves. And you guys jump all over his shit, before hearing his side of a 20yr old story. Phone Post
1/10/13 10:56 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
WoodenPupa 56 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 7/24/02
Posts: 7330
HELWIG - 

Call me a jerkoff but there shouldnt be ANY tolerance or rationalization of this kind of shit.

Rape, child molesting, all forms of deviant sexuality.

Its not "oh a mistake". Its ruining someone for life.


Sometimes the victims themselves forgive the perpetrator, even in cases where the perp refuses to admit guilt. I've often questioned how satisfying or empowering THAT can really be; but in cases where the perp admits to wrong-doing, and shows repentance, showing forgiveness can help achieve mental health again.

But there are victims who don't forgive anything, yet can simply move on by their own will---"That which does not kill me makes me stronger." But of course just saying this, as opposed to actually carrying it out, are entirely different things.

No doubt many people are "ruined" by sexual abuse, and only a low percentage of people in reality manage to overcome it. But some are able to, and they show something important about the human condition.
1/10/13 11:02 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
shinbang Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 3/17/11
Posts: 442
There's more Attorneys in here than in a courtroom

| Share | Email | Subscribe | Check IPs

Reply Post

You must log in to post a reply. Click here to login.

ad