Fightmetric had 1,2,3,5 to Aldo

2/3/13 2:28 AM	Ignore \| Quote \| Edit \| Warn Admin \| Vote Down \| Vote Up \| Delete Post
Mufasatheking Member Since: 4/22/11 Posts: 721	http://blog.fightmetric.com/2013/02/aldo-vs-edgar-official-ufc-statistics.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter Theres a striking, grappling and decision tab. It gave the fight 49-46 to Aldo I guess the judges do know what theyre doing

2/3/13 2:58 AM	Ignore \| Quote \| Edit \| Warn Admin \| Vote Down \| Vote Up \| Delete Post
Foos 17 Member Since: 6/24/05 Posts: 3854	How accurate is fight metric numbers? and can you truly get a feel for a fight from looking at those numbers You have ignored this user.

2/3/13 2:59 AM	Ignore \| Quote \| Edit \| Warn Admin \| Vote Down \| Vote Up \| Delete Post
MMOZ 23 Member Since: 2/3/13 Posts: 20	Mufasatheking - http://blog.fightmetric.com/2013/02/aldo-vs-edgar-official-ufc-statistics.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter Theres a striking, grappling and decision tab. It gave the fight 49-46 to Aldo I guess the judges do know what theyre doing Trusting a computer... have you watched ANY of the Terminator movies? Did they teach you nothing? You have ignored this user.

2/3/13 3:06 AM	Ignore \| Quote \| Edit \| Warn Admin \| Vote Down \| Vote Up \| Delete Post
Stea1th Member Since: 7/7/10 Posts: 1818	Ill allow it You have ignored this user.

2/3/13 3:38 PM

Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up

SilentSamurai8 1 The total sum of your votes up and votes down

Member Since: 10/26/12
Posts: 75

MMOZ -
Mufasatheking - http://blog.fightmetric.com/2013/02/aldo-vs-edgar-official-ufc-statistics.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Theres a striking, grappling and decision tab.

It gave the fight 49-46 to Aldo

I guess the judges do know what theyre doing

Trusting a computer... have you watched ANY of the Terminator movies? Did they teach you nothing?

Lol

2/3/13 3:38 PM	Ignore \| Quote \| Edit \| Warn Admin \| Vote Down \| Vote Up \| Delete Post
irishrottie Member Since: 3/8/09 Posts: 17196	Landing 10 shots that have no real effect vs 5 that bust your face open is the story of that fight. You have ignored this user.

2/3/13 3:39 PM	Ignore \| Quote \| Edit \| Warn Admin \| Vote Down \| Vote Up \| Delete Post
Entreri Member Since: 12/25/05 Posts: 25147	MMOZ - Mufasatheking - http://blog.fightmetric.com/2013/02/aldo-vs-edgar-official-ufc-statistics.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter Theres a striking, grappling and decision tab. It gave the fight 49-46 to Aldo I guess the judges do know what theyre doing Trusting a computer... have you watched ANY of the Terminator movies? Did they teach you nothing? You have ignored this user.

2/3/13 3:56 PM

Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up

madmaxej9 2 The total sum of your votes up and votes down

Member Since: 5/15/11
Posts: 118

irishrottie -
Landing 10 shots that have no real effect vs 5 that bust your face open is the story of that fight.

that!

best example are leg kicks. Edgar kicked Aldo probably 15 times and those kicks had absolutely no effect. Aldo kicked him 4 times (even took him off his feet once) and his leg turned purple instantly....

Edgar's face was bloody and swollen, Aldo had nothing....that is how you see how effective your striking is...not by the number you touched someone...

2/3/13 4:17 PM	Ignore \| Quote \| Edit \| Warn Admin \| Vote Down \| Vote Up \| Delete Post
OnlyTheStrongSurvive 294 Member Since: 1/29/11 Posts: 10851	Foos - How accurate is fight metric numbers? and can you truly get a feel for a fight from looking at those numbers Well the striking numbers in round 3 and 5 are very close. Who was doing more damage with their strikes? There is your answer. You have ignored this user.

2/3/13 4:21 PM

Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up

UGCTT_ Lay'n'PrayNINJA

Member Since: 5/13/11
Posts: 17556

irishrottie -
Landing 10 shots that have no real effect vs 5 that bust your face open is the story of that fight.

This. People need to understand the scoring criteria for Effective Striking:

F. Clean Strikes
1. The fighter who is landing both effective and efficient clean strikes.
2. There are two ways of measuring strikes:
-the total number of clean strikes landed (more efficient)
-the total number of heavy strikes landed (more effective)

G. The heavier striker who lands with efficiency, deserves more credit from the Judges than total number landed.
1. If the striking power between the fighters was equal, then the total number landed would be used as the criteria.
2. The total number of strikes landed, should be of sufficient quantity favoring a fighter, to earn a winning round.

Plain as day that 3+5 should be Aldo's after reading this and watching the rounds with out Rogan or any other bias. Glad the judges got this fight correct. Obvious winner is obvious.

2/3/13 4:23 PM

Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up

UGCTT_ Lay'n'PrayNINJA

Member Since: 5/13/11
Posts: 17557

madmaxej9 -
irishrottie -
Landing 10 shots that have no real effect vs 5 that bust your face open is the story of that fight.

that!

best example are leg kicks. Edgar kicked Aldo probably 15 times and those kicks had absolutely no effect. Aldo kicked him 4 times (even took him off his feet once) and his leg turned purple instantly....

Edgar's face was bloody and swollen, Aldo had nothing....that is how you see how effective your striking is...not by the number you touched someone...

I feel you are correct until you go into the description of the looks of Edgar vs Aldo.

You should only be looking at the force and impact, and not how different fighters faces and bodies react to the damage. Gingers and pale crackas always swell and show more visible damage. I try to only focus on the impact and physical reaction of the opponent to guage how "Effective" the striking is. Hope that made sense.

| Share | Email | Subscribe | Check IPs

Reply Post

You must log in to post a reply. Click here to login.

Type:	Standard Video
Source (embed code):
Body: [HTML] [Text]