GeekGround >> Sometimes I think Porn is ahead of Hollywood...
| 2/1/13 5:27 PM | |
BobbyDigital420
22
Member Since: 1/1/01 Posts: 8354 |
|
| 2/1/13 6:01 PM | |
BigWilliam
125
Member Since: 3/7/05 Posts: 20057 |
They didn't have to change the names at all? I thought that was a copyright violation. |
| 2/1/13 8:11 PM | |
YVEL MACHIDA
195
Member Since: 6/10/12 Posts: 6976 |
Lol heard about this in Hollywood Babble on last week. Hilarious
|
| 2/1/13 8:22 PM | |
MixedMartialArse
55
Member Since: 7/27/03 Posts: 2894 |
Seems legit.
|
| 2/1/13 8:27 PM | |
Mumbly Joe
72
Member Since: 7/29/06 Posts: 1999 |
It looked pretty good until you see Doc Ock CGI. |
| 2/1/13 9:53 PM | |
fryabusa
183
Member Since: 1/1/01 Posts: 9022 |
BigWilliam - They didn't have to change the names at all? I thought that was a copyright violation. For some reason as long as they call it a parody it falls outside of copyright protection. I don't know the specifics but someone here might. |
| 2/2/13 1:32 AM | |
|
jbapk
Member Since: 1/1/01 Posts: 10847 |
fryabusa -BigWilliam - They didn't have to change the names at all? I thought that was a copyright violation. There are actual legal standards they have to meet in order to meet the definition of parody. Essentially the argument is they make a new work that "comments" on the original work. This is supposed to allow for cultural critique and blah blah. Obviously there are questions on if these porn things actually are a commentary, but that's how they get by. Marvel & DC might actually have a decent case if they decided to sue, but there are cost to benefit considerations. |
| 2/3/13 10:42 AM | |
RedDragonUK
189
Member Since: 8/2/05 Posts: 38740 |
If I recall there was a big law case involving underground comix and Disney as they used to parody Mickey Mouse in the books.
|
| 2/3/13 11:25 AM | |
crescentwrench
55
Member Since: 1/1/01 Posts: 27181 |
Plus I don't imagine they want to make that many people mad by messing up things with a lawsuit. The comic book and porn crossover audience has to be close to 100%. |
| 2/3/13 5:44 PM | |
Matthieu Battle
36
Member Since: 7/8/09 Posts: 1292 |
mein gott, this looks retarded as shit. (runs off to piratebay) |
| 2/4/13 10:13 AM | |
Hercules Rockerfeller
153
Member Since: 7/24/09 Posts: 4820 |
crescentwrench - You also have to consider that suing them also gives the porn producers free publicity. I doubt that the big 2 are happy about stuff like this, but don't want to make more people aware of it than the ones that already do. |
| 2/4/13 12:55 PM | |
BIGWHITESEXY
402
Member Since: 12/20/05 Posts: 36805 |
LOFL..............TYLER KNIGHT AS LUKE CAGE? |
| 2/4/13 3:47 PM | |
Daredevil73
82
Member Since: 9/3/02 Posts: 33922 |
I feel like I should watch this. |
| 2/4/13 9:09 PM | |
QTyp
11
Member Since: 12/14/00 Posts: 9739 |
Black Cat is in it!!? I must watch. |
| 2/5/13 9:42 AM | |
|
SamboMMA
Member Since: 11/6/08 Posts: 3403 |
Sadly I think this is the only way Spider-Woman makes it into a film. |
| 2/5/13 10:46 AM | |
Hercules Rockerfeller
153
Member Since: 7/24/09 Posts: 4821 |
SamboMMA - Sadly I think this is the only way Spider-Woman makes it into a film. She was also in the Avengers porn parody. Also, they got her costume down pretty well. Granted, she wasn't wearing it very long, but that's how these things go. |
| 2/5/13 12:44 PM | |
|
SamboMMA
Member Since: 11/6/08 Posts: 3406 |
Hercules Rockerfeller -SamboMMA - Sadly I think this is the only way Spider-Woman makes it into a film. Thanks. I think I heard about that one. I'm amazed they didn't use Mockingbird as well. Her costume lends itself easily to porn parodies. |
Reply Post
You must log in to post a reply. Click here to login.




