logout
help
framed forum
go pro
subscriptions
account
create thread
PhilosophyGround >> If you think Heidegger is hard...
| 8/6/05 9:54 PM | |
peter beiers
Edited: 06-Aug-05 Member Since: 01/01/2001 Posts: 18 |
What about Wittgenstein!He is impossible. |
| 8/6/05 10:30 PM | |
|
hakujin
Edited: 06-Aug-05 Member Since: 03/26/2002 Posts: 1798 |
Prepared to be flamed my friend (as far as the PhilosophyGround can flame anyone, that is). |
| 8/6/05 10:56 PM | |
|
FudoMyoo
Edited: 06-Aug-05 Member Since: 01/01/2001 Posts: 12507 |
why would he be flamed here Hakujin? |
| 8/7/05 10:20 AM | |
|
Dogbert
Edited: 07-Aug-05 Member Since: 01/01/2001 Posts: 14869 |
I think Wittgenstein is much more readable (doesn't mean much, of course). There is also more readable secondary literature on Wittgenstein to make sense of his writings. Most of his writings were of course not meant to be published, so it has a rathe unpolished look. |
| 10/13/06 3:27 PM | |
bleier
16 
Edited: 13-Oct-06 Member Since: 05/13/2005 Posts: 113 |
The two actually bear striking similarities when you look at the broader projects. Hubert Dreyfus does good work making this point in his introduction to "What Computers Still Can't Do" |
Reply Post
You must log in to post a reply. Click here to login.
