Botched execution in Oklahoma


by itskrisdude

McALESTER, Okla. (AP) — A botched execution that used a new drug combination left an Oklahoma inmate writhing and clenching his teeth on the gurney Tuesday, leading prison officials to halt the proceedings before the inmate's eventual death from a heart attack.

Clayton Lockett, 38, was declared unconscious 10 minutes after the first of the state's new three-drug lethal injection combination was administered. Three minutes later, though, he began breathing heavily, writhing, clenching his teeth and straining to lift his head off the pillow.

The blinds were eventually lowered to prevent those in the viewing gallery from watching what was happening in the death chamber, and the state's top prison official eventually called a halt to the proceedings. Lockett died of a heart attack a short time later, the Department of Corrections said.

"It was a horrible thing to witness. This was totally botched," said Lockett's attorney, David Autry.

The apparent failure of the execution is likely to fuel more debate about the ability of states to administer lethal injections that meet the U.S. Constitution's requirement they be a neither cruel nor unusual punishment. That question has drawn renewed attention from defense attorneys and death penalty opponents in recent months, as several states scrambled to find new sources of execution drugs because drugmakers that oppose capital punishment — many based in Europe — have stopped selling to prisons and corrections departments.

Several states have gone to court to shield the identities of the new sources of their execution drugs. Missouri and Texas, like Oklahoma, have both refused to reveal their sources, but both of those states have since successfully carried out executions with their new supplies.

Tuesday was the first time Oklahoma used the drug midazolam as the first element in its execution drug combination. Other states have used it before; Florida administers 500 milligrams of midazolam as part of its three-drug combination. Oklahoma used 100 milligrams of that drug.

"They should have anticipated possible problems with an untried execution protocol," Autry said. "Obviously the whole thing was gummed up and botched from beginning to end. Halting the execution obviously did Lockett no good."

Republican Gov. Mary Fallin ordered a 14-day stay of execution for an inmate who was scheduled to die two hours after Lockett, Charles Warner. She also ordered the state's Department of Corrections to conduct a "full review of Oklahoma's execution procedures to determine what happened and why during this evening's execution."

Robert Patton, the department's director, halted Lockett's execution about 20 minutes after the first drug was administered. He later said there had been vein failure.

The execution began at 6:23 p.m., when officials began administering the first drug, the sedative midazolam. A doctor declared Lockett to be unconscious at 6:33 p.m.

Once an inmate is declared unconscious, the state's execution protocol calls for the second drug, a paralytic, to be administered. The third drug in the protocol is potassium chloride, which stops the heart. Patton said the second and third drugs were being administered when a problem was noticed and it's unclear how much of the drugs made it into the inmate's system.

Lockett began writhing at 6:36. At 6:39, a doctor lifted the sheet that was covering the inmate to examine the injection site.

"There was some concern at that time that the drugs were not having that (desired) effect, and the doctor observed the line at that time and determined the line had blown," Patton said at a news conference afterward, referring to Lockett's vein rupturing.

After an official lowered the blinds, Patton made a series of phone calls before calling a halt to the execution.

"After conferring with the warden, and unknown how much drugs went into him, it was my decision at that time to stop the execution," Patton told reporters.

Lockett was declared dead at 7:06 p.m.

Autry, Lockett's attorney, was immediately skeptical of the department's determination the issue was limited to a problem with Lockett's vein.

"I'm not a medical professional, but Mr. Lockett was not someone who had compromised veins," Autry said. "He was in very good shape. He had large arms and very prominent veins."

In Ohio, the January execution of an inmate who made snorting and gasping sounds led to a civil rights lawsuit by his family and calls for a moratorium. The state has stood by the execution but said Monday that it's boosting the dosages of its lethal injection drugs.

A four-time felon, Lockett was convicted of shooting 19-year-old Stephanie Neiman with a sawed-off shotgun and watching as two accomplices buried her alive in rural Kay County in 1999 after Neiman and a friend arrived at a home the men were robbing.

Warner had been scheduled to be put to death two hours later in the same room and on the same gurney. The 46-year-old was convicted of raping and killing his roommate's 11-month-old daughter in 1997. He has maintained his innocence.

Lockett and Warner had sued the state for refusing to disclose details about the execution drugs, including where Oklahoma obtained them.

The case, filed as a civil matter, placed Oklahoma's two highest courts at odds and prompted calls for the impeachment of state Supreme Court justices after the court last week issued a rare stay of execution. The high court later dissolved its stay and dismissed the inmates' claim that they were entitled to know the source of the drugs.

By then, Fallin had weighed into the matter by issuing a stay of her own — a one-week delay in Lockett's execution that resulted in both men being scheduled to die on the same day.

Get the MMA Underground app. for iPhone and Andriod devices.
iPhone Application Andriod MMA Underground Application

Recent Comments »

Darup site profile image  

5/1/14 4:10 PM by Darup

And also the 14th amendment:... Nor shall any state deprive any person of LIFE... Without due process of law...

Darup site profile image  

5/1/14 3:51 PM by Darup

The Constitution expressly authorizes the death penalty in its text. The fifth amendment states:No person shall be held to answer for a CAPITAL or otherwise infamous crime unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury.....

Shogun of Harlem site profile image  

5/1/14 2:53 PM by Shogun of Harlem

Nope, it doesn't, but I don't I feel sympathy when POS like the murderer in this case suffered a little. Of course, any system can be improved upon. See the post from "The Noose" and VTFU to him, as that hits the nail on the head.

Pura Vida site profile image  

5/1/14 2:50 PM by Pura Vida

Firing squad is still available in a few states, and has been used as recently as 2010.

The Noose site profile image  

5/1/14 2:46 PM by The Noose

I support the death penalty, but there is no question we suck at administering it.First, you have the 4% someone already mentioned that are innocent.Second, whether you want to admit it or not, racism plays a significant role in who gets executed. Its a statistical fact. The race of the criminal isnt a significant factor, but the race of the victim significantly affects the likelyhood that a person will be given the death penalty. If you kill a white person, you are far more likely to be executed than if you kill any non white person. Third, we spend way too much money on it. We keep people in prison for 15 years before we get around to killing them. Aside from the money we waste on the condemned, it reduces the effectiveness of the death penalty as a deterrent. If we are going to have a death penalty, at least we should try to do a better job of administering it.

the_sandman site profile image  

5/1/14 2:45 PM by the_sandman

Well Shogun Polpot... the system does not work for you then.Maybe you shouldn't be ranting off like it does.

Shogun of Harlem site profile image  

5/1/14 2:38 PM by Shogun of Harlem

In my personal opinion yes, but not politically/legally. I do not oppose the death penalty because of the 8th amendment.So you original statement about a criminal deserving a painless death being protected by the Constitution is wrong. It is your personal opinion. You just said that criminals should have no rightsTry again, I didn't, but make things up if it helps you. I would think that disproportionate punishment would fall under the "unusual" side of things, but orientalists, like you seem to claim to be, disagree with the concept entirely.Don't think, that is why things are screwed up. When a Liberal thinks, things go to shit. I gave you the background, you can agree or disagree, but AGAIN don't claim that something is in the Constitution that guarantees a speedy and painless death for a murderer.

Shogun of Harlem site profile image  

5/1/14 2:23 PM by Shogun of Harlem

Nope, I am for killing him at the cheapest way possible. You gotta break a few eggs to make an omelet.

the_sandman site profile image  

5/1/14 1:04 PM by the_sandman

So spending 10 million a pop to execute random mentally ill people that had horrible public defenders is good public policy to you?A 4% error rate - meaning we are actually murdering 1 in 25 of these people because they are not guilty of the convicted crime... that's okay with you?Okay, all I need to know. No need to continue our dialog.

anthonyMI site profile image  

5/1/14 11:53 AM by anthonyMI

You just said that criminals should have no rights, otherwise they would have more rights than their victim. So, obviously, you don't much care for amendments #4-8. Your way of bitching about the expansion of rights implies you have issues with #9.