UnderGround Forums
 

UnderGround Forums >> Stephens: I'm going to break him [Cerrone]


5/13/12 1:56 PM
Ignore | Vote Down | Vote Up
Underground Blog
1069 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 12/3/08
Posts: 9024
MixedMartialArts.com
 

"I couldn't care less about his kicks," said Stephens, scheduled to face Cerrone in the co-main event of UFC on FUEL TV 3 on Tuesday at the Patriot Center in Fairfax, Va. "I couldn't care less about his punching power. And I'm going to break him."

Both coming off losses to top-10 opponents, Cerrone and Stephens could use a win to start new runs at the elite ranks at 155 pounds. Pitting them against each other gives the UFC a good chance of an action-packed affair; between them, Cerrone and Stephens have combined for 13 fight-night awards under the banner of UFC parent Zuffa.

Yet Stephens doesn't go into the cage with the notion of winning a bonus for action.

"Bringing that win bonus back to my family is the only thing I'm concerned about," he said. "I think my style is just exciting enough as it is. I've never been one of those guys who felt like I had to go out there and perform real crazy and had to do anything."

read entire article...


5/13/12 2:10 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
BooZe
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 10/10/11
Posts: 1397
Gnarls Gnarlington - them's fighting words.
True dat Phone Post
5/13/12 2:23 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Kid_dynamite319
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 2/19/12
Posts: 113
With that being said Cerrone 2nd round submission!
5/13/12 2:38 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
GriffinQ
127 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 10/17/09
Posts: 6203
Doubt it... Phone Post
5/13/12 6:06 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
twodragunns
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 05/13/12 6:49 PM
Member Since: 2/15/10
Posts: 182

       I think Jeremy is gonna change his mind about the leg kicks during and after this fight. Stephens has a lot of close SD wins on his record, but this one won't go his way unfortunately.
 
5/13/12 6:19 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Van City 604
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/31/12
Posts: 31
and with those words Stephens just lit Cerrone's flame.
5/13/12 6:23 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
theGunslinger12
4 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 4/11/12
Posts: 4
Cowboy wins a decision by staying on the outside and stuffing Stephens takedowns IMO Phone Post
5/13/12 6:34 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
FixedPartialArts
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 6/12/11
Posts: 524
Van City 604 - and with those words Stephens just lit Cerrone's flame.


Then it was a good strategy because that will make it less likely Cerrone shoots for TD's where he has the advantage. On the feet, Stephens has the advantage. He beat Stout and Guillard on a high majority of the media cards. He held his own against Pettis. Those are superior overall strikers to Cerrone. Cerrone's striking defense has always been garbage and it has gotten him lit up in many fights during his career. That's not a good tendency to have going into a fight with Stephens. I'm not sure even Cerrone's granite chin can't be cracked if he's hit by that guy enough, and even if he doesn't they score toward a striking decision. If this fight spends a significant time on the ground, Stephens could be in trouble. Although he's not exactly Mel Guillard in that area either.
5/13/12 6:38 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
UGCTT_Fraser_Finlay
224 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 8/14/11
Posts: 5708
Cerrone will win Phone Post
5/13/12 7:10 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
GriffinQ
127 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 10/17/09
Posts: 6207
FixedPartialArts -
Van City 604 - and with those words Stephens just lit Cerrone's flame.


Then it was a good strategy because that will make it less likely Cerrone shoots for TD's where he has the advantage. On the feet, Stephens has the advantage. He beat Stout and Guillard on a high majority of the media cards. He held his own against Pettis. Those are superior overall strikers to Cerrone. Cerrone's striking defense has always been garbage and it has gotten him lit up in many fights during his career. That's not a good tendency to have going into a fight with Stephens. I'm not sure even Cerrone's granite chin can't be cracked if he's hit by that guy enough, and even if he doesn't they score toward a striking decision. If this fight spends a significant time on the ground, Stephens could be in trouble. Although he's not exactly Mel Guillard in that area either.
Marcus Davis at the end of his career almost KTFO of Stephens...not saying that that's a guarantee that Cerrone will do the same, just saying that he can't just walk through everything. Phone Post
5/13/12 7:27 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
dahosse
9 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/1/01
Posts: 7567
theGunslinger12 - Cowboy wins a decision by staying on the outside and stuffing Stephens takedowns IMO Phone Post
I see Stephens by ko Phone Post
5/13/12 7:31 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
UGCTT_El Pescadero
2373 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/16/12
Posts: 870
Big fan of both these guys... They always come to fight, never look for a shitty Decision and are both great dudes! Gunna be an exciting fight, I see fight of the night bonuses be handed out! Phone Post
5/13/12 7:35 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
FixedPartialArts
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 6/12/11
Posts: 526
GriffinQ - 
FixedPartialArts -
Van City 604 - and with those words Stephens just lit Cerrone's flame.


Then it was a good strategy because that will make it less likely Cerrone shoots for TD's where he has the advantage. On the feet, Stephens has the advantage. He beat Stout and Guillard on a high majority of the media cards. He held his own against Pettis. Those are superior overall strikers to Cerrone. Cerrone's striking defense has always been garbage and it has gotten him lit up in many fights during his career. That's not a good tendency to have going into a fight with Stephens. I'm not sure even Cerrone's granite chin can't be cracked if he's hit by that guy enough, and even if he doesn't they score toward a striking decision. If this fight spends a significant time on the ground, Stephens could be in trouble. Although he's not exactly Mel Guillard in that area either.
Marcus Davis at the end of his career almost KTFO of Stephens...not saying that that's a guarantee that Cerrone will do the same, just saying that he can't just walk through everything. <img src="/images/phone/droid.png" alt="Phone Post" border="0" style="vertical-align:middle;"/>


Marcus Davis is a straight boxer. The opponents Stephens has looked better against, i.e.: Stout, Guillard, and Pettis (even though he deserved to lose); are all kickboxers like Cerrone. Stephens has good kick defense and counters off them well. He also fares better offensively against opponents who he knows where they're going to be. Davis' movement was more troubling. Pettis' and Guillard's movement was somewhat troubling. Stout not as much. Cerrone barely moves at all.
5/13/12 7:47 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
OftheWay
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 11/16/10
Posts: 1220
I sincerely hope Cerrone viciously knocks out Stephens and I believe he will. Stephens has power and decent footwork, but he does not have the complete skill set necessary to take Cerrone out.

Cerrone's standup is definitely good enough to compete with and probably defeat Stephens, but if not his ground game his vastly superior. Plus Cerrone's greatest attribute is his mental strenghth; he's not afraid of anyone and his fights reflect this. He approaches his opponents the way most MMA fans desire all fighters to approach their opponents, intelligent and technical yet without trepidation or hesitancy. The fact that he was outclassed by Nate Diaz in his last outing says more about Diaz than it does about Cerrone. In fact, the way Diaz dismantled an incredibly talented and well rounded Jim Miller shows that Diaz will give any fighter fits at 155.

Cerrone's still among the best in the division and should have little trouble destroying Jeremy Stephens on his way back up the 155 lbs. ladder. Phone Post
5/13/12 7:58 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
twodragunns
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 05/13/12 7:59 PM
Member Since: 2/15/10
Posts: 183
FixedPartialArts - 
Van City 604 - and with those words Stephens just lit Cerrone's flame.


Then it was a good strategy because that will make it less likely Cerrone shoots for TD's where he has the advantage. On the feet, Stephens has the advantage. He beat Stout and Guillard on a high majority of the media cards. He held his own against Pettis. Those are superior overall strikers to Cerrone. Cerrone's striking defense has always been garbage and it has gotten him lit up in many fights during his career. That's not a good tendency to have going into a fight with Stephens. I'm not sure even Cerrone's granite chin can't be cracked if he's hit by that guy enough, and even if he doesn't they score toward a striking decision. If this fight spends a significant time on the ground, Stephens could be in trouble. Although he's not exactly Mel Guillard in that area either.
Stephen's is a gr8 striker, but he lost the Stout fight imo opinion and in fight metrics opinion as well, so they posted the results and Guilliard beat Stephens on the judges cards, but thought the decision was close. Stephens is a power striker, but lacks the footwork and sub defense needed to be considered more than a tough, hard hitting mma fighter with a big heart. This fight should be FOTN and will deliver for the fans pleasure.
   
5/13/12 8:22 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
FixedPartialArts
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 6/12/11
Posts: 528
twodragunns - 
FixedPartialArts - 
Van City 604 - and with those words Stephens just lit Cerrone's flame.


Then it was a good strategy because that will make it less likely Cerrone shoots for TD's where he has the advantage. On the feet, Stephens has the advantage. He beat Stout and Guillard on a high majority of the media cards. He held his own against Pettis. Those are superior overall strikers to Cerrone. Cerrone's striking defense has always been garbage and it has gotten him lit up in many fights during his career. That's not a good tendency to have going into a fight with Stephens. I'm not sure even Cerrone's granite chin can't be cracked if he's hit by that guy enough, and even if he doesn't they score toward a striking decision. If this fight spends a significant time on the ground, Stephens could be in trouble. Although he's not exactly Mel Guillard in that area either.
Stephen's is a gr8 striker, but he lost the Stout fight imo opinion and in fight metrics opinion as well, so they posted the results and Guilliard beat Stephens on the judges cards, but thought the decision was close. Stephens is a power striker, but lacks the footwork and sub defense needed to be considered more than a tough, hard hitting mma fighter with a big heart. This fight should be FOTN and will deliver for the fans pleasure.


Actually, Fight Metric scored the Stout fight for Stephens. http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2010/5/9/1464480/fightmetric-reports-for-sam-stout Like the blogger asserts, I'm not really sure what people were watching who say Stout won. That was pretty clear cut in favor of Stephens. He was crushing Stout with power strikes. Maybe the Canadian crowd had some influence on perception, but it was really telling that even they didn't boo the decision.

As for the fight against Guillard, 5 of the 6 media cards included in the MMA Minority Report favored Stephens, some by multiple points. http://mmadecisions.com/decision.jsp?id=1848

Really the only opponent who has fared a little better than him on the feet, is Pettis, whose striking is superior overall to Cerrone's.

About Stephens' sub defense, it's hard to say it's an issue when he was last subbed at 22 years old, and has since received excellent BJJ training at his gym.

Stephens is underrated, and that's as a result of debuting in UFC on his 21st birthday, and some suspect judging. If he'd have gotten the nod against Guillard the perception of him would be drastically different. Everybody who beats Guillard gets overrated afterward.
5/13/12 10:07 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
dylandrugs
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 6/19/07
Posts: 51
FixedPartialArts - 
twodragunns - 
FixedPartialArts - 
Van City 604 - and with those words Stephens just lit Cerrone's flame.


Then it was a good strategy because that will make it less likely Cerrone shoots for TD's where he has the advantage. On the feet, Stephens has the advantage. He beat Stout and Guillard on a high majority of the media cards. He held his own against Pettis. Those are superior overall strikers to Cerrone. Cerrone's striking defense has always been garbage and it has gotten him lit up in many fights during his career. That's not a good tendency to have going into a fight with Stephens. I'm not sure even Cerrone's granite chin can't be cracked if he's hit by that guy enough, and even if he doesn't they score toward a striking decision. If this fight spends a significant time on the ground, Stephens could be in trouble. Although he's not exactly Mel Guillard in that area either.
Stephen's is a gr8 striker, but he lost the Stout fight imo opinion and in fight metrics opinion as well, so they posted the results and Guilliard beat Stephens on the judges cards, but thought the decision was close. Stephens is a power striker, but lacks the footwork and sub defense needed to be considered more than a tough, hard hitting mma fighter with a big heart. This fight should be FOTN and will deliver for the fans pleasure.


Actually, Fight Metric scored the Stout fight for Stephens. http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2010/5/9/1464480/fightmetric-reports-for-sam-stout Like the blogger asserts, I'm not really sure what people were watching who say Stout won. That was pretty clear cut in favor of Stephens. He was crushing Stout with power strikes. Maybe the Canadian crowd had some influence on perception, but it was really telling that even they didn't boo the decision.

As for the fight against Guillard, 5 of the 6 media cards included in the MMA Minority Report favored Stephens, some by multiple points. http://mmadecisions.com/decision.jsp?id=1848

Really the only opponent who has fared a little better than him on the feet, is Pettis, whose striking is superior overall to Cerrone's.

About Stephens' sub defense, it's hard to say it's an issue when he was last subbed at 22 years old, and has since received excellent BJJ training at his gym.

Stephens is underrated, and that's as a result of debuting in UFC on his 21st birthday, and some suspect judging. If he'd have gotten the nod against Guillard the perception of him would be drastically different. Everybody who beats Guillard gets overrated afterward.

Wow, great post Fixed. Can't argue with any of that.
5/15/12 10:13 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
GriffinQ
127 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 10/17/09
Posts: 6230
Ttt Phone Post
5/15/12 10:24 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Tahiti Bo
61 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 8/26/05
Posts: 11750
^ lol... that sure was a wet fart
5/15/12 10:24 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
iCameiLostiRetiredDiaz
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 10/5/10
Posts: 1915
A Flock Of Seagals -
FixedPartialArts - 
Van City 604 - and with those words Stephens just lit Cerrone's flame.


Then it was a good strategy because that will make it less likely Cerrone shoots for TD's where he has the advantage. On the feet, Stephens has the advantage. He beat Stout and Guillard on a high majority of the media cards. He held his own against Pettis. Those are superior overall strikers to Cerrone. Cerrone's striking defense has always been garbage and it has gotten him lit up in many fights during his career. That's not a good tendency to have going into a fight with Stephens. I'm not sure even Cerrone's granite chin can't be cracked if he's hit by that guy enough, and even if he doesn't they score toward a striking decision. If this fight spends a significant time on the ground, Stephens could be in trouble. Although he's not exactly Mel Guillard in that area either.


lol
Hehe Phone Post

Reply Post

You must log in to post a reply. Click here to login.