UnderGround Forums
 

Boxing UnderGround >> Tunney was too weak to win today!

| Share | Email | Subscribe | Check IPs

7/18/12 2:58 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
HULC
9 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/1/01
Posts: 4120
 
A slightly controversial title i know, but i was looking at his pictures today and the man looks like he would be out muscled by a light middleweight. This is from facebook so i don't know if it will show up here (let me know) but this is Tunney just before the Dempsey fight:

http://a2.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/523943_448944855139138_722542788_n.jpg

So was he really that much technically better than everyone else around at the time? Or was that deceptively spindly frame hiding heavyweight power?
7/18/12 6:41 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
buddie
487 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/1/01
Posts: 5631
"Guys back then were stronger on average than guys today."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAl9XDCCCHQ

7:50 of he above
7/19/12 3:08 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
PoundforPound
176 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/1/01
Posts: 26625
Tunney is underrated because he spent most of his career at light heavyweight. But skillwise he might be the #1 heavyweight ever...so smooth.

He was the only one to ever really trouble Harry Greb and he outclassed Dempsey pretty clearly in 2 fights. (The Long Count not withstanding.)
7/20/12 3:20 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Chappie
103 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 07/21/12 7:24 PM
Member Since: 1/1/01
Posts: 3560
Tunney is profoundly underrated by historians simply due to the fact that he doesn't seem to have been overly liked by the boxing writers of his era.It is pretty amazing that the guy managed to compete for the 13 years in the era in which he competed, losing only once to the great Harry Greb. Along the way Tunney managed beat fighters such as Tommy Loughran, Jack Dempsey, Harry Greb, Battling Levinsky, Georges Carpentier, Tommy GIbbins and New Orleans finest, Martin Burke.

By the way Martin, I knew from prior posts years ago, that you are related to Martin Burke and that your name sake had fought against Gene Tunney, but I had no clue until a few minutes ago, that the real Martin Burke had also been a former National AAU middleweight champion and had faced the likes of Greb, Meehan, Loughran, Fulton, Young Stribling, Godfrey, Chip, and Risko. Out of curiosity, did MB ever mention anything about fighting Stribling or Tommy Loughran or how their skills might have compared to Tunney's?
7/20/12 9:42 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Chappie
103 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/1/01
Posts: 3562
Stribling is an interesting guy who has largely been forgotten with time. In spite of the fact that he died before he was 30, the guy had almost 300 fights and I believe, although I could be wrong on this, that he is second on the all-time knockout list behind only Archie Moore.
7/23/12 2:50 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
pharochuck
418 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/1/01
Posts: 7049
MixedMartialArts LLC, Moderator
HULC - A slightly controversial title i know, but i was looking at his pictures today and the man looks like he would be out muscled by a light middleweight. This is from facebook so i don't know if it will show up here (let me know) but this is Tunney just before the Dempsey fight:

http://a2.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/523943_448944855139138_722542788_n.jpg

So was he really that much technically better than everyone else around at the time? Or was that deceptively spindly frame hiding heavyweight power?
his record pretty much speaks for itself. he was basically a 189lbs after training down to that weight and not touching weights. he was way more solid then he looked
 
7/26/12 3:28 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
RAVUribe
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 7/18/12
Posts: 8
martinburke - There are some studies that have found that, due to the abundance of estrogen introduced into the environment, the average male born post-1970 has about half the testosterone level of a man born 100 years ago.

Have you heard people talk about "dad strength" or "old man strength"? I think the test levels of previous generations has something to do with that.

Having a full tank of testosterone makes a huge difference. Ever notice how many threads on the OG are about testosterone therapy? Or how many guys are having trouble losing weight or performing sexually? WAY more prevalent now than in the past.

Don't let appearances fool you. If weigh-ins were still at 11am the same day as the fight, they'd all look like the old timers. Not only that, but present-day fighters would have to move up at least one traditional division.

If title fights went back to 15 rounds, heavyweights would shrink back to the same size as in the past. It's a very rare giant that has the stamina to last 15 rounds.
Surprised no one replied about your comment. Your spot on bro!!! Everything you said I agree with especially the testosterone levels, people in general these days are lazy weak unmotivated human beings. It makes me sick to my stomach Phone Post
7/26/12 3:58 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
pharochuck
418 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/1/01
Posts: 7072
MixedMartialArts LLC, Moderator
15 round fights for heavies would take all these guys weighing in the high 240's and get them down to 215-225
7/26/12 5:06 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
buddie
487 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/1/01
Posts: 5668
martinburke - I think you're only the second person to respond to that, even I've posted it a number of times on huge, cantankerous threads on the OG.

It's sorta like farting at the dinner table; nobody wants to even admit it really happened.


Didn't reply, but I def read your comment and thought about it a lot. It rings very true and for a lot of reasons.
10/5/12 1:24 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Bench
36 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 5/23/05
Posts: 3137
. Phone Post
10/9/12 7:20 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
419
9 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 11/12/00
Posts: 22889
It wasn't socially acceptable to admit impotence back in the day, and the average old guy is eating junk food too.

| Share | Email | Subscribe | Check IPs

Reply Post

You must log in to post a reply. Click here to login.