UnderGround Forums

PoliticalGround >> 9/11 Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out (Video)

11/25/12 10:27 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
57 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 9/30/09
Posts: 2988
Larry Appleton - WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane, exhibited all the characteristics of classic controlled demolition with explosives:

Rapid onset of collapse
Sounds of explosions at ground floor – a second before the building's destruction
Symmetrical "structural failure" – through the path of greatest resistance – at free-fall acceleration
Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed in its own footprint
Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds
Expert corroboration from the top European controlled demolition professional
Foreknowledge of "collapse" by media, NYPD, FDNY
In the aftermath of WTC7's destruction, strong evidence of demolition using incendiary devices was discovered:

FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly qualified witnesses
Chemical signature of the incendiary thermite found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples
WTC7 exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire:

Slow onset with large visible deformations
Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)
Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never collapsed Phone Post
Where is your degree??? All these people talking about controlled demolition don't have any idea of what they are talking about. Phone Post
11/25/12 10:49 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Larry Appleton
5 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 4/5/10
Posts: 10967
^^ watch the first video I posted, ALL of speakers are ARCHITECTS or ENGINEERS with degrees
www.AE911truth.org Phone Post
11/26/12 12:42 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
131 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 11/26/12 5:57 AM
Member Since: 2/22/09
Posts: 3586

Architects Shy From Truther 9/11 Conspiracy Theory

The boardroom at the Washington, D.C., headquarters of the American Institute of Architects...recently served as a peculiar venue for the 23rd stop on the 30-city “world premiere tour” of AIA member Richard Gage’s new film 9/11: Explosive Evidence—Experts Speak Out: Final Edition.
Since 2006, Gage has been traveling all over the world under the banner of his organization, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth...to preach the theory that the Twin Towers and 7 World Trade Center were actually brought down by explosives on September 11, 2001, and not the impact of two hijacked jetliners and the resulting fires and debris...
The former employee of the Walnut Creek, Calif.-based architectural firm Akol & Yoshii is a full-time 9/11 conspiracy theorist, but Gage tries to maintain a façade of being a scientist asking scientific questions...
All of Gage’s so-called evidence has been rebutted in peer-reviewed papers...
Gage...seems to be attempting to cloak his organization in the officialdom of the venerable 155-year-old professional institution, even as AIA wants nothing to do with his organization. At the start of his latest film, he explains that he is “a licensed architect of over 20 years and member of the American Institute of Architects.”...
Aside from Gage, though, there was not a single other architect in the room, much less an official from AIA, or even another member. The 80-strong crowd was made up largely of members of the local 9/11 Truth movement and other political activists...
11/26/12 1:44 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
86 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 11/6/11
Posts: 682

How is it so hard for some of you to understand that there are elements of government that benefit most at a time of war, when money and power are least restricted? Every major war of the last century was started with a false flag, 9/11 isn't the exception, it's the fuckin' blueprint. Seems pretty elementary to me, I can't even begin to explain for frustrating it is that there's still people out there buying into this bullshit.

Reply Post

You must log in to post a reply. Click here to login.