UnderGround Forums
 

UnderGround Forums >> Johny:"GSP threw me under the bus on 'shady' VADA


9/11/13 1:50 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
gotmysitchpackedbyweidman
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 9/14/12
Posts: 3529
andyman011 -  The problem I have with vada is its literally independent. There's no governing body and the tests mean nothing to the UfC.

I'm not saying he did, but it makes it possible for someone like gsp to throw a bribe in there as a failsafe.

Maybe he paid them to ruin Johnnys test so if gsp gets kod or loses he can say oh well vada tested this and this and he came back positive. Phone Post

bribery aspect is complete conjecture, no evidence to back it up it is a conspiracy theory. Also government officials can be bribed just as easy as anyone in a private organisation.

9/11/13 2:00 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
andyman011
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 12/7/11
Posts: 2817
gotmysitchpackedbyweidman -
andyman011 -  The problem I have with vada is its literally independent. There's no governing body and the tests mean nothing to the UfC.

I'm not saying he did, but it makes it possible for someone like gsp to throw a bribe in there as a failsafe.

Maybe he paid them to ruin Johnnys test so if gsp gets kod or loses he can say oh well vada tested this and this and he came back positive. Phone Post

bribery aspect is complete conjecture, no evidence to back it up it is a conspiracy theory. Also government officials can be bribed just as easy as anyone in a private organisation.

Yes but that's my point. Its a lot easier to bribe a non sanctioned body. Keith kizer wouldn't take one but who knows what head of vada will do for 100k Phone Post
9/11/13 2:03 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
RileyPust
107 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 6/4/11
Posts: 2993

^^Then why would GSP's camp have an email dated three weeks ago agreeing to the testing program? If he bribed VADA then they'd both be busted by the NSAC.

9/11/13 2:04 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Herman Munster
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09/11/13 2:04 PM
Member Since: 1/27/13
Posts: 904
andyman011 - 
gotmysitchpackedbyweidman -
andyman011 -  The problem I have with vada is its literally independent. There's no governing body and the tests mean nothing to the UfC.

I'm not saying he did, but it makes it possible for someone like gsp to throw a bribe in there as a failsafe.

Maybe he paid them to ruin Johnnys test so if gsp gets kod or loses he can say oh well vada tested this and this and he came back positive. Phone Post

bribery aspect is complete conjecture, no evidence to back it up it is a conspiracy theory. Also government officials can be bribed just as easy as anyone in a private organisation.

Yes but that's my point. Its a lot easier to bribe a non sanctioned body. Keith kizer wouldn't take one but who knows what head of vada will do for 100k Phone Post

 

Yes, Keith Kizer is a much more honest, standup, and honorable individual than Dr Margaret Goodman, Keith has sure proven that over the last week.

 

9/11/13 2:05 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
gotmysitchpackedbyweidman
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09/11/13 2:18 PM
Member Since: 9/14/12
Posts: 3530
andyman011 - 
gotmysitchpackedbyweidman -
andyman011 -  The problem I have with vada is its literally independent. There's no governing body and the tests mean nothing to the UfC.

I'm not saying he did, but it makes it possible for someone like gsp to throw a bribe in there as a failsafe.

Maybe he paid them to ruin Johnnys test so if gsp gets kod or loses he can say oh well vada tested this and this and he came back positive. Phone Post

bribery aspect is complete conjecture, no evidence to back it up it is a conspiracy theory. Also government officials can be bribed just as easy as anyone in a private organisation.

Yes but that's my point. Its a lot easier to bribe a non sanctioned body. Keith kizer wouldn't take one but who knows what head of vada will do for 100k Phone Post

 

did you even read my post? How do you know officials from the governing body aren't taking bribes? Where is the evidence apart from 'It is a private company' which is not evidence at all, it is quite a naive way to think.

 

9/11/13 2:24 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Glovegate
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 10/2/10
Posts: 7543

Kizer wouldn't take a bribe?  We just proved that he flat out lied about GSP's willingness to undergo any test.  He received a letter from his lawyer 3 weeks beforehand stating exactly that and he turned around and told a complete lie to the world.  Then he tried to claim that asking a question was tantamount to refusal.  In what world is that true?  A world where you're an emperor and anything other than "yes sir" is offensive to you?

I said it before but it bears repeating.  That this guy's statements aren't ignored as a matter of course is a shit stain on the intelligence of sports fans.

VADA's independence shouldn't be of that much concern.  It shouldn't be ignored but it's not reason enough to dismiss the work they've done.  That's like saying a guy shouldn't get a title shot because you don't like his face.  They're a 501 c 3 charitable organization.  They've popped high profile fighters before, fighters they "sponsored" and whose pictures appeared on their website.

Thus far, the NSAC has proven itself to be neither honest nor professional.  VADA has yet to do so. 

9/11/13 2:35 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Herman Munster
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09/11/13 2:37 PM
Member Since: 1/27/13
Posts: 906

 

 
 
really solid piece here on Kizer and his axe grinding agenda against Dr Goodman and VADA with a little sample below..This is all about Kizer, his massive ego and him being shown up by Dr Goodman and VADA's superior testing standards.  It's a joke GSP is even considering doing additional testing with these assholes.
 
 
 
 
 
http://www.fightopinion.com/2012/05/09/kizer-goodman-vada/
 
As we pointed out in the article in which I am quoting from here, Keith Kizer recently has a history of making public comments that are intended to be verbal jabs at Dr. Margaret Goodman, who operates the Voluntary Anti-Doping Association.
 
So, why is he mad at Dr. Goodman? She doesn’t believe in Therapeutic Use Exemptions for testosterone, he does. He says testosterone usage shouldn’t be used as a scarlet letter against fighters. Dr. Goodman believes that the T/E ratio for standard urine tests with athletic commissions should be on a 4:1 ratio instead of a 6:1 ratio. While Kizer has softened his stance recently on this topic, he has been an ardent defender of a 6:1 T/E ratio in the past.
 
So, despite the Nevada State Athletic Commission cooperating with VADA for supplemental drug testing, there’s clearly a history here with Kizer and his difference of opinion with Dr. Goodman. We’ve been consistent in pointing this out when others will not do so.
 
9/11/13 2:52 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Herman Munster
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09/11/13 3:15 PM
Member Since: 1/27/13
Posts: 907

Another good read on "glass jaw" Kizer getting busted up by Mauro Ranallo - one of the few media personalities that has challenged this sketchy character that is head of the NSAC.  His reaction to Mauro very much explains his reaction to GSP's lawyer.  The boxing world has known for years what Kizer is all about, the mma world has a bit of catching up to do.   

 

http://www.fightopinion.com/2012/04/06/keith-kizer-glass-jaw/

Yesterday morning when I posted pertinent questions that the media needs to ask Keith Kizer about the Nick Diaz case, I did not know ahead of time that he would be appearing on Mauro Ranallo’s radio show. I have challenged the media to press Kizer on a number of questions as opposed to letting his spin go unchallenged.

To Mauro’s strong credit, he read my post yesterday. He saw the questions I asked. He proceeded to ask Keith Kizer the questions we presented. The end result? In my opinion, the Executive Director had an ugly & regrettable performance. The level of disrespect shown toward Mauro for his line of questioning was palpable. Mauro asked the questions we have asked about testosterone & marijuana usage in MMA. He challenged Keith Kizer in a fair manner. When Mauro continued to ask important & completely relevant questions regarding drug testing protocols, Keith Kizer got agitated. He tried to challenge & attack the premise of what Mauro was asking by claiming Mauro’s questions were based on faulty or incorrect premises. He got testy & whiny in a hurry. Soon, he became dismissive and petulant.
 
 
9/11/13 3:29 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
RileyPust
107 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09/11/13 3:34 PM
Member Since: 6/4/11
Posts: 2995
Herman Munster - 
To Mauro’s strong credit, he read my post yesterday. He saw the questions I asked. He proceeded to ask Keith Kizer the questions we presented. The end result? In my opinion, the Executive Director had an ugly & regrettable performance. The level of disrespect shown toward Mauro for his line of questioning was palpable. Mauro asked the questions we have asked about testosterone & marijuana usage in MMA. He challenged Keith Kizer in a fair manner. When Mauro continued to ask important & completely relevant questions regarding drug testing protocols, Keith Kizer got agitated. He tried to challenge & attack the premise of what Mauro was asking by claiming Mauro’s questions were based on faulty or incorrect premises. He got testy & whiny in a hurry. Soon, he became dismissive and petulant.
 
 

 

Yeah, looks like Hendricks wanted to do a testing program that was perhaps less advanced than VADA's program. GSP's lawyer was asking questions to see how the NSAC's program stacked up to VADA, Keith became dismissive and petulant and said that he "takes that as a no". 

 

9/11/13 3:50 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
krept
69 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/1/01
Posts: 9768
The amount of time the guys spend on a 1hr call discussing this should easily eclipse the cost of testing at both VADA and WADA??

It was probably mentioned earlier, but why not just test with two different labs? i.e. both athletes submit samples to two different places, see if there is a discrepancy between the two even down to ug/L in the duplicates or whatever, do a QAPP if needed etc.
9/11/13 4:24 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
MattyECB
179 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 7/4/11
Posts: 2827
The full emails have been released on BE and I suggest reading them to anyone curious.

The lawyer email I posted was the last email in a chain and is what pissed of Kizer.

Basically beforehand, they're having negotiations and asking Kizer a bunch of questions about the WADA-accredited NSAC lab Vs. WADA-accredited VADA lab and Kizer gets annoyed at the questions.

Kizer tells them they should be happy he's doing them a favor and letting them use the NSAC labs because it's a privilege and makes the fight legitimate so GSP's lawyer responds by saying in that case, we'll do both VADA and NSAC, email us the documents and I'll be away for 10 days. When I return we'll do them (This is the email I posted earlier.


This is the period of time Kizer referred to when he said,

""And they continued to ask questions and then finally they got to the point where they were unavailable and can't be reached in any manner for at least 10 days. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that's a 'no.'"

I still think Kizer's being a cunt and GSP's lawyer is being a lawyer, but I'm sure everyone will have their own opinion. It's a long read, but it's very interesting and a good look into the prep-work.

http://www.sbnation.com/2013/9/11/4719572/georges-st-pierre-johny-hendricks-drug-testing-gsp-ufc
9/11/13 4:28 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
MattyECB
179 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 7/4/11
Posts: 2828
Here's the email chain (Too big for one post, and I'll put the sauce at the end):



De : Keith Kizer

Envoyé : 14 août 2013 13:25

À : 'Rodolphe Beaulieu'

Cc : Firas; Michael Mersch; Ted

Objet : RE:

Thank you for your email.

Please see the answers below.

Keith Kizer

Executive Director

Nevada Athletic Commission

From: Rodolphe Beaulieu

Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 5:39 AM

To: Keith Kizer

Cc: Firas; Michael Mersch

Subject:

Hello Mr Kizer,

Couple of questions.

I would like to know the exact list of substances that will be tested by the Salt Lake City lab.? See WADA's Prohibited List - http://www.wada-ama.org/Documents/World_Anti-Doping_Program/WADP-Prohibited-list/2013/WADA-Prohibited-List-2013-EN.pdf

What will be the detection limits for each test? All methods used for testing are consistent with current WADA technical documents.

Who will be the MRO (medical review officer)? Dr. Timothy Trainor is the Commission’s Consulting Research Physician.

Will IRMS analysis will be included for the 19-norandrosterone, la testosterone, la DHEA etc)? Such analysis can and may be done, at the discretion of the Commission

Thanks

Rodolphe

Two days later was the next set of questions (and, again, answers in bold):

From: Rodolphe

Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 9:08 AM

To: 'Keith Kizer'

Cc: 'Firas'; Michael Mersch; Ted

Subject: RE:

Hello,

After discussing with Georges and his medical advisors, we do have a few more questions (see below).

I also want to clarify one point, VADA is NOT sponsoring the tests as Firas previously stated on the call. It was a misunderstanding. It would cost 7,500$ per fighter under VADA and VADA will absorb 5,000$ for a total cost of $20k which is in line with your estimation of the costs with the SMRTL lab.

1- Can you provide us the Nevada Athletic Commission policies and collection procedures (including results management). Please provide a copy of your policy. All the Commission’s regulations can be found athttp://leg.state.nv.us/NAC/NAC-467.html.

2- I know you indicated that the Nevada Athletic Commission will use the Salt Lake City lab. Can you confirm who will be the collection company that you intend to use? No

3- Does the Nevada Athletic Commission has an insurance for this anti-doping program? Please provide a copy. No, the Commission is a government agency.

4- How long has the Nevada Athletic Commission been conducting these un-announced program with a WADA accredited lab using Olympic level testing? The Commission has been working directly with the SMRT lab starting this summer. Do you/will you also test for HGH and EPO? I already informed you that the testing will be for substances on WADA’s Prohibited List- http://www.wada-ama.org/Documents/World_Anti-Doping_Program/WADP-Prohibited-list/2013/WADA-Prohibited-List-2013-EN.pdf.

5- How many fighters have been tested with this program by the Nevada Athletic Commission? The Commission has performed OOC testing on about 50 athletes.

Thank You

Rodolphe Beaulieu, CFA

Partner - LB3i Sports
9/11/13 4:29 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
MattyECB
179 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 7/4/11
Posts: 2829
Slightly over an hour later, Mersch responded to the ongoing conversation:

From: Michael Mersch

Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 10:18 AM

To: Rodolphe

Cc: 'Firas'; Ted; Keith Kizer

Subject: RE:

Rodolphe,

I just tried to call you but did not get an answer. I thought that the options available to Georges were made clear during our last call but apparently not.

Please understand that the Nevada Athletic Commission is doing Georges a favor by offering to be involved in this process. The benefit, to Georges, of having them involved is that it brings legitimacy to any pre-fight testing procedures and any results that may come out of said pre-fight testing. I think Mr. Kizer made it clear that, if Georges want them to be involved, he had a very strict protocol that he expected to be followed and, if Georges elected not to follow said protocol, that was his choice but that the NSAC would not be involved other than to the extent they would traditionally be involved in the drug testing of athletes under Nevada State law.

Issues such as collection procedures have already been discussed. Who their medical officer is and that the Salt Lake Lab will dictate collection times in concert with the Nevada Commission has also been explained to you.

Again, the choices for Georges are very simply:

1) Elect to work with the NSAC and pay for additional drug testing pursuant to the very clear directives of Executive Director Kizer as was discussed at length on the call we had with Ted Ahrens, Mr. Kizer and Commissioner Aguilar;

2) Elect not to request NSAC pre-fight involvement

As we discussed on the call, Georges stated goal here seems to be to establish, through medical testing, that Georges is a "clean" fighter. You do not need to work with either the NSAC or VADA to establish that in my opinoin [sic]. As you may be aware, there is an accredited WADA level lab in Montreal that you can work with or you can simply have medical testing performed by any board-certified endocrinologist of your choosing to establish this.

Similarly, if Georges elects to work with VADA, that is his choice but, as described by Mr. Kizer, VADA has no role or impact on the process of licensing and testing fighters within the State of Nevada (nor in any other jurisdiction for that matter). Additionally, Mr. Hendricks has made it clear that while he is happy to submit to any testing involving the Nevada Commission, he is uncomfortable working with VADA for the reasons noted on our call and those noted above in this email.

So again, the decision is up to George. Please let me know what he elects to do.

Thanks.

Michael Mersch

When contacted for clarification on the intent of Mr. Mersch's email, a UFC representative simply added, "The email is fairly self-explanatory. We attempted to broker joint drug testing through the NSAC and St-Pierre and his camp elected to utilize VADA."

That appeared to be all Kizer needed as he moved to claim that GSP was effectively declining hours later:

Le 2013-08-16 à 14:32, Keith Kizer a écrit :

Mr. Mersch and Mr. Beauliue:

Thank you both for your email. Special thanks to Rudolphe for being professional enough to divulge Mr. Firas’s misrepresentation.

I am happy to answer any questions (and have – see my answers to yours latest questions below). However, the Commission does not allow any licensee to dictate or craft the testing. Not only is this inappropriate, it is not something the Commission would even consider.

I will take the latest email as a refusal by Mr. St. Pierre to request enhanced steroid and drug testing by the Commission, which is his choice. Of course Mr. St. Pierre and Mr. Hendricks must comply with any and all testing by the Commission.

Keith Kizer

Executive Director

Nevada Athletic Commission

Just over 24 hours later, Beaulieu responded, saying that St-Pierre was in for the NSAC testing and would also do additional VADA testing himself:

From: Rodolphe Beaulieu

Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2013 6:52 PM

To: Keith Kizer

Cc: Michael Mersch; Firas; Ted

Subject: Re: RE:

Hello all,

We spoke with Georges today and he took his decision so for your information, Georges has decided that if Johny Hendricks does not want to do VADA and prefers your proposed enhanced steroid and drug testing by the Nevada Athletic Commission, Georges will also do it, in addition to VADA.

I will be out of the office without access to email or voicemail until Aug. 27th but in the meantime, please provide us with all documentation, a detailed invoice and payment instructions necessary to proceed with such enhanced steroid and drug testing by the Commission.

Best regards

Rodolphe

And of course, all credit goes to SBNation and you guys should still go to the site to see the actual article and get some perspective if you want to form your own opinion.

Just thought it should be here for posterity's sake.

http://www.sbnation.com/2013/9/11/4719572/georges-st-pierre-johny-hendricks-drug-testing-gsp-ufc
9/11/13 4:45 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
SOO72
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 11/14/02
Posts: 5413
Kizer, you're a moron. I know you post here so read that very carefully.

They wanted to know if your testing is up to snuff to adequately screen Mr. Hendricks. They saw how you were turning things in your warped head, and they said OK we will do both even if Hendricks wants to avoid VADA.

The only assholes here are Hendricks and Keiser. Hendricks should be forced to comply with whatever testing GSP does at this point. He's the shady one with something to hide and Keizer is just being a moron as usual.
9/11/13 4:59 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
RileyPust
107 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 6/4/11
Posts: 2996

Also for the record, VADA covered the costs of both BJ Penn and Rory when they were in the program. 100%.

And if anyone finds the lawyer's questions about which drugs they test for suspiscious, allow me to steal a quote from Dr. Goodman:

 

Obviously, it’s a little bit different than the testing that’s now done in athletic commissions in that we include testing for human growth hormone (HGH), for erythropoietin (Epo).  We also do more extensive anabolic steroid testing that includes carbon isotope ratio testing.  So all of those things are more costly than you would have with an athletic commission typically.  But the main point, it wasn’t so much that we were trying to set up VADA as a testing program as much as it was supposed to be an educational program.  And so you’re looking into it, other media entities are looking into it, the fighters are looking into it.  It just opens up the discussion.  That was the whole point.  The bottom line was not to have fighters lining up around the block asking to be tested, that certainly wasn’t the point.  It was the educational aspect.

 

Note that she specifically says HGH and EPO, which Georges' lawyer asked about.

9/11/13 5:19 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Herman Munster
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09/11/13 5:20 PM
Member Since: 1/27/13
Posts: 908

No reason Hendricks could give that validates his paranoia or belief that there is a conflict of interest with GSP and VADA.  Yes, Johny, they want to know that your 215lb WW ass will be tested for GH if you only opt to do WADA testing,  which at this point looks doubtful.

 

9/11/13 5:24 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Vulva Fabulous
725 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 4/11/07
Posts: 24225
HexRei -
Malvert the Janitor - It's okay Johnny..you're old friend says so!

Phone Post 3.0

proof that BJ actually does have to cut off a leg to make weight!
Boooooooooooo!

You lifted my joke from a couple of pages ago.


Which in turn has more than likely been said thousands of times before me so I should STFU about lifting jokes :) Phone Post
9/11/13 5:37 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
BobbyDigital420
122 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/1/01
Posts: 9051

this is what the new trash talking is. 

instead of calling each other out directly, they do it this way.

it's the new era of trash talk!

 

it hurts my head.

 

 

just fight already!

(let them bang bro)

 

:)

 

9/11/13 6:43 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Mertvaya Ruka
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 2/22/11
Posts: 1393
Hendricks still hasn't commented on doing both tests?
9/11/13 6:53 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
RileyPust
107 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 6/4/11
Posts: 3002
Mertvaya Ruka - Hendricks still hasn't commented on doing both tests?

He's gonna skate by without doing anything extra lol.

9/11/13 7:46 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Mertvaya Ruka
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 2/22/11
Posts: 1394
RileyPust - 
Mertvaya Ruka - Hendricks still hasn't commented on doing both tests?

He's gonna skate by without doing anything extra lol.


Seems like it, GSP's already giving random samples.

His MMA Hour interview solved this for him, I guess.
9/11/13 8:44 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
andyman011
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 12/7/11
Posts: 2820
Mertvaya Ruka -
RileyPust - 
Mertvaya Ruka - Hendricks still hasn't commented on doing both tests?

He's gonna skate by without doing anything extra lol.


Seems like it, GSP's already giving random samples.

His MMA Hour interview solved this for him, I guess.
Hey guys when and what are you testing for. Let me know. Phone Post
9/11/13 8:54 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
EvilMaster
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 5/4/06
Posts: 63831
Georges is not impressed by Hendricks performance.
Georges was trying to do something good for mixed martial arts, and that hillbilly went and turned it all negative.

Now Georges is going to throw him under his helbows as punishment.

Oh yes...It's true.
9/11/13 9:21 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Jaybrone
328 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 11/9/10
Posts: 14205
SupesUp -  Imagine rory had responded that way to bj? He would have been crucified. Phone Post

Oh ABSOLUTELY they would have.

9/11/13 10:09 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
MattyECB
179 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 7/4/11
Posts: 2830
Btw, now that we have the full email chain, we know GSP NEVER FUCKING ASKED FOR PRE-DETERMINED TIMES.

He only asked informatino about the testing, then about the paperwork...

Kizer threw a shitfit, so GSP agreed to do both...

Then Kizer told him to fuck off. It didn't copy properly, but you guy cans just use the link in my last post or go to BE to see the full email chain. Kizer and Hendricks both fucking exaggerated the shit out of this, and I'm in awe a government worker like Kizer can be such an incompetent, bias piece of shit. And I hope you're lurking here you clown dick

Reply Post

You must log in to post a reply. Click here to login.