UnderGround Forums
 

UnderGround Forums >> Deadspin Slams the UFC Again


[ 1 ] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6/26/14 6:03 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Bobby Lupo
48 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/12/05
Posts: 48941
 
 
Whatever Happened To The UFC?
 
 
Imagine if the NBA added 30 expansion teams over the next two years, and then sent out a favored reporter to lecture the public about how true fans should appreciate the diminished quality of play. This sounds impossibly stupid, and yet it's more or less what's happening in one increasingly dim corner of the sports world.
 
This Saturday, the UFC will run a card in Auckland, New Zealand, to be broadcast on their online subscription service. The main event will feature New Zealander James Te Huna, who's lost two straight, and Nate Marquardt, who's lost three straight; the rest of the card isn't much more inspiring.
 
Also this Saturday, the UFC will run a card in San Antonio, Texas, to be televised on Fox Sports 1. The main event will feature Jeremy Stephens, a featherweight with a 10-8 UFC record best known for once having been arrested the day before he had a scheduled bout, leading to thankfully failed negotiations in which promoter Dana White tried to convince the Hennepin County sheriff's office to let the guy out of jail just long enough for him to fight. The co-main event will feature Nicholas Muskoe, a welterweight so obscure he doesn't even have a Wikipedia page.
 
Including these two, the UFC has 24 events scheduled for the rest of this year, five more than they ran in all of 2009. The ever-increasing number of cards—and, more than that, the consequent decline in their quality as good preliminary bouts become iffy undercard bouts and passable undercard bouts become lousy main events—has been a problem for long enough that a lot of serious fans are just dead tired of hearing about it. (In 2011, when the promotion ran a mere 27 shows, I asked White if he wasn't running too many; he said the only problem was that they weren't running more, and apparently he meant it.) It's so bad by now, though, that the usual word for it, oversaturation, doesn't quite cut it. This is something more like hypersaturation.
 
You can tell this is a live issue because Kevin Iole—a Yahoo Sports writer and a thoroughly reliable guide to what the UFC would like people to think—felt compelled to go in hard earlier this week with an article titled "Why the UFC's saturation strategy makes perfect sense." The UFC's His argument is basically that hardcore fight fans should stop bitching, because the awful cards aren't meant for them, but for people who don't actually watch fights.
 
The dirty little secret here is that the seeming overload of shows the UFC is staging here, there and everywhere was not designed for the hardcore fan base. ... [T]he seeming glut of shows the UFC is staging will serve its purpose if it persuades some who watch infrequently or not at all to become casual fans who may, every now and then, buy a pay-per-view.
This is a strange argument only because it makes absolutely no sense. The only people who could possibly have any interest in a fight card headlined by James Te Huna and Nate Marquardt are UFC ultras, degenerate gamblers, and maybe curious New Zealanders. The method by which watching bad fights will turn members of this last group into people willing to pay money to see fights goes unexplained, but it's hinted at when Iole describes the prevailing thinking within the UFC: "all that people need to become fans is exposure to the sport on a regular basis."
 
Calling this magical thinking would be doing it a bit too much credit. When the sport enjoyed a surge of general interest in the mid- to late aughts, it had to do with compelling athletes and compelling fights. People didn't become fans because of some accidental exposure to the sport, as such; they became fans because they were exposed to rivalries like Chuck Liddell vs. Randy Couture, or because they saw an incredible highlight reel of Anderson Silva knockouts online, or because they heard that pro wrestler Brock Lesnar was going to try his hand at a real fight.
 
For a lot of reasons—the aging of a generation of stars, the promotion's habit of running down its own fighters, and bad luck, among others—the UFC, even though it runs some great shows from time to time, doesn't have those kinds of broadly compelling athletes or fights on offer right now. What it does have is its #brand, and a Rovellian faith in it—a belief that you can't run too many shows, that fighting is destined to be the biggest sport in the world, and that if you can get people to watch a UFC card, any card, you'll make some new fans.
 
That may have been true five years ago, when the #brand stood for cards featuring fighters people cared about in main events that mattered, with quality fights on the undercard. When it increasingly comes to stand for main events featuring non-contenders on losing streaks, though, or regional-level competitors in meaningless scraps, not so much. And when even the big cards feature a lot of detritus and headliners no one has ever heard of, they start to actively run old fans off, rather than make new ones, as even a cursory look at the promotion's pay-per-view performance of late makes pretty clear. Which is, after all, the point of the complaints that the UFC Iole is dismissing. This isn't so much about whether a promotional strategy of running thin and bad fight cards makes any sense in the abstract as it is about fight fans complaining about feeling ripped off when they're asked to pay $60 for a card featuring maybe one good fight. You'd figure that Iole—a boxing writer, once upon a time—would know all about that.
 
Iole would surely counter that even if this is true, none of it matters: Running terrible cards featuring faceless, generic fighters is to the benefit of the marketing company that is the sport's leading promoter, so the tradeoff between good cards and boring ones is one "that most true fans would gladly make," and anyway no one's forcing anyone to watch. ("Consumers have choices when spending their entertainment dollars," as he puts it.)
 
This is a strange thing, in the way it asks fans to value the interests of the businessmen who own the UFC more than their own interests as spectators. It's even stranger than that in how utterly anachronistic it is.
 
One of the minor pleasures of being a fight fan is seeing the UFC reenact the development of any major sport as if captured by time-lapse photography. It's born; it struggles; it captures public interest; and now, it reaches beyond its grasp. The actual sport, as such, has grown incredibly quickly, so that the best fights the UFC can now offer are as far beyond what they could promote a decade or so ago as an early '80s Celtics vs. Lakers game was beyond some slow and erratic early '60s NBA contest. The infrastructure around it—the promoters, the fawning press, and so on—has meanwhile grown in real time, slowly and painfully. It will all come together at some point. In the meantime, fans will talk about how they want to see good fights, and various people with stakes in the game will tell them to pipe down and pay up, and it will all continue to be too stupid to be true.
 
6/26/14 6:07 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Chomas
38 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 4/29/09
Posts: 18380
Wow somebody has a vendetta. Some decent points but the venom attached to them detracts from their credibility. Phone Post 3.0
6/26/14 6:08 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
JimmersonzGlove
554 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 6/5/05
Posts: 34862
Iole got ethered. Phone Post 3.0
6/26/14 6:11 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
vagabond
20 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/19/14
Posts: 1000
That was actually on point. Good article.
6/26/14 6:12 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
knee smash
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 11/26/13
Posts: 280
Chomas - Wow somebody has a vendetta. Some decent points but the venom attached to them detracts from their credibility. Phone Post 3.0

lol what?

there was no venom there, just cold hard truth
6/26/14 6:13 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
John M
260 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 2/11/13
Posts: 3073
There's a reason no one takes that site seriously...
6/26/14 6:13 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
ABE FROMAN
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 12/15/02
Posts: 74652

Dana promised we wouldn't have no-name cards like Boxing.

I always remember that.

6/26/14 6:14 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Kim Jong Uno
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 6/1/13
Posts: 875
Excellent and relevant write-up. Articulates the lunacy of Iole's column very nicely
6/26/14 6:15 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
TheKidAintMine
156 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/1/01
Posts: 17248
Chomas - Wow somebody has a vendetta. Some decent points but the venom attached to them detracts from their credibility. Phone Post 3.0

Yup
6/26/14 6:16 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Bobby Lupo
48 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 06/26/14 6:16 PM
Member Since: 1/12/05
Posts: 48942

I thought it was a spanking, but a valid and much needed one. 

I haven't bought a PPV since Anderson-Weidman 2 and I used to buy them all.

6/26/14 6:18 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Bobby Lupo
48 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/12/05
Posts: 48943

Truth Hurtz, bros

6/26/14 6:20 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
MMALOGIC
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 06/26/14 6:22 PM
Member Since: 8/17/08
Posts: 12702

somebody is still upset that they werent credentialed for a UFC event.

6/26/14 6:21 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
epwar
560 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 5/28/07
Posts: 21828

Pretty spot on.  However, they fail to address the fact that the President of the UFC goes out of his way to mock his fighters (all the way up to GSP) in public when they don't do what he wants.

6/26/14 6:21 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
vagabond
20 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/19/14
Posts: 1002
TheKidAintMine - 
Chomas - Wow somebody has a vendetta. Some decent points but the venom attached to them detracts from their credibility. Phone Post 3.0

Yup

How does that make any sense? Either he makes valid points or he doesn't. Can you refute anything he said or not? Him having a so called " vendetta" doesn't make his opinion any less true.
6/26/14 6:23 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
vagabond
20 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/19/14
Posts: 1003
epwar - 

Pretty spot on.  However, they fail to address the fact that the President of the UFC goes out of his way to mock his fighters (all the way up to GSP) in public when they don't do what he wants.



For a lot of reasons—the aging of a generation of stars, the promotion's habit of running down its own fighters, and bad luck, among others—the UFC, even though it runs some great shows from time to time, doesn't have those kinds of broadly compelling athletes or fights on offer right now.




Kinda touched on hit here.
6/26/14 6:23 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
CormierCumminsideme
69 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 12/29/10
Posts: 426

It's a really tough problem for the UFC to solve, honestly. I think in hindsight they would have been better off keeping the WEC as a brand for lower weight fighters instead of folding it into the UFC main brand.

6/26/14 6:25 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Kim Jong Uno
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 6/1/13
Posts: 876
epwar - 

Pretty spot on.  However, they fail to address the fact that the President of the UFC goes out of his way to mock his fighters (all the way up to GSP) in public when they don't do what he wants.


I believe that was delicately addressed as "the promotion's habit of running down its own fighters"
6/26/14 6:26 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
BurnMyEyes
55 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 3/15/11
Posts: 928
has deadspin ever written a positive article about the UFC?
6/26/14 6:32 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
ShoreBreaker420
1023 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 9/3/12
Posts: 23449
BurnMyEyes - has deadspin ever written a positive article about the UFC?
In the last few years has anyone? Phone Post 3.0
6/26/14 6:34 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Bobby Lupo
48 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/12/05
Posts: 48944

All fads must die

6/26/14 6:36 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
MMALOGIC
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 8/17/08
Posts: 12703

Oversaturation is a myth.

If you add up all the UFC, WEC, and Strikeforce events in 2010 you come up with 47 events.  Zuffa is having 46 events this year so you actually have less events this year under one banner than you did in 2010 under the 3 seperate banners.

The primary problem for the UFC is that it went from networks that pull an average of over 800k viewers (spike/fx) to a network that pulls an average of 200k viewers or less (fs1).  The UFC is now on a network with 1/4th the traffic.

Over exposure isnt the problem... it's under exposure.  The UFC is in the desert.

It's like moving your restaurant from main street to bumble fuck.  If you lose 3/4ths of the traffic that used to walk by your restaurant it's going to hurt business.  If anything you'd want more events not less to get people used to your new location.

 

6/26/14 6:41 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
vagabond
20 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 1/19/14
Posts: 1006
It ain't 2010 anymore buddy.
6/26/14 6:43 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Kim Jong Uno
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 6/1/13
Posts: 877
I don't want the UFC to die, I want them to just be a regular multi-billion dollar conglomerate like all my other favorite sports leagues. The other commissioners are pretty good about keeping my interest high without needing to make me feel negatively about any of the players, or making me pay extra to watch the Pelicans vs. one of the D-League teams
6/26/14 6:44 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
smth416
13 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 11/11/09
Posts: 5941
The article didnt even mention the channel hopping the ufc has done either. Phone Post 3.0
6/26/14 6:44 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Kick Boxe
62 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Member Since: 9/27/10
Posts: 8251
Pwned Phone Post 3.0
[ 1 ] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Reply Post

You must log in to post a reply. Click here to login.