UnderGround Forums
 

PoliticalGround >> new photos of WTC complex


8/23/06 10:35 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
CPracer16
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 23-Aug-06
Member Since: 06/06/2006
Posts: 1233
 
Here is a link to some new pictures from 9/11 and the days after taken by a fire fighter. I would love to know peoples thoughts about the pics. http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2006/230806wtccomplex.htm
8/23/06 10:36 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
MR BIG1
80 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 23-Aug-06
Member Since: 07/28/2002
Posts: 12995
if its not on the "FOX 5 News show" it is garbage oh and I dont read so FRAT!!!
8/23/06 10:46 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
MR BIG1
80 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 23-Aug-06
Member Since: 07/28/2002
Posts: 12997
8/23/06 10:47 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
MR BIG1
80 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 23-Aug-06
Member Since: 07/28/2002
Posts: 12998
a clear result of random catostraphic events
8/23/06 10:51 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
CPracer16
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 23-Aug-06
Member Since: 06/06/2006
Posts: 1235
mrbig1 would you post the pics of the buildings on fire please? Thanks
8/23/06 10:52 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
MR BIG1
80 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 23-Aug-06
Member Since: 07/28/2002
Posts: 12999
you believe the collapse "theory" LOL!! this should be fun *waits for name calling*
8/23/06 10:52 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
BigEyedFish
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 23-Aug-06
Member Since: 03/18/2002
Posts: 8844
you have a blue name...
8/23/06 10:53 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Clint
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 23-Aug-06
Member Since: 01/01/2001
Posts: 20230

I believe something was fishy with 9/11.

How is it that the day Fighter Jets were needed to shoot down possible threats they were on maneuvers 400 miles away?

It seems that the terrorists had someone on the inside to pick the perfect day, and our government hasn't even looked at that angle.

Also why did WTC 7 collapse?

8/23/06 11:01 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Clint
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 23-Aug-06
Member Since: 01/01/2001
Posts: 20235

So it is better that the people in the jets didn't die alone and the terrorists took even more people with them?

8/23/06 12:05 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
MR BIG1
80 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 23-Aug-06
Member Since: 07/28/2002
Posts: 13005
8/23/06 1:36 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
killer rabbit
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 23-Aug-06
Member Since: 04/20/2004
Posts: 3411
So, just for arguments sake, how many pounds of explosives would it have taken to do a controlled demo of the WTC towers? Also, how would these have to be placed? What volume would these explosives take up and where would they have been hidden? I see all this shit about controlled demo, but most of the fruitcakes that think this have ZERO concept of what would be involved in taking down the towers with demolitions. Also, by the way, that pic is of a part of the building that was taken down deliberately afterwards. I watched it fall.
8/23/06 3:25 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
CPracer16
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 23-Aug-06
Member Since: 06/06/2006
Posts: 1242
Killer, you are very misinformed and this has been covered time after time here. It does not take much explosives to bring down a structure. you are correct about one thing though, the rubble of WTC 7 is the building that was taken down deliberately
8/23/06 3:29 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
TexArcher
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 23-Aug-06
Member Since: 12/30/2002
Posts: 18058
"It does not take much explosives to bring down a structure." Yeah, and they go off SILENTLY so none of the thousands of people around would even hear them.
8/23/06 3:31 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
MR BIG1
80 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 23-Aug-06
Member Since: 07/28/2002
Posts: 13014
FDNY NYPD EMTs and people in the buildings all heard explosions
8/23/06 3:34 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Stone Rolled
16 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 23-Aug-06
Member Since: 01/01/2001
Posts: 2989
killer rabbit, watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcUQg3DadaA There were many unusual evacuations and power-downs in the WTC in the days just prior to 9/11. Marvin Bush, George W. Bush's brother, was one of the owners of Securacom (now called Stratasec) which was the company in charge of security for the World Trade Center.
8/23/06 4:00 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Downtown
3 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 23-Aug-06
Member Since: 01/01/2001
Posts: 7824
LOL at "new pics". The towers were attacked by terrorists in planes (and only by terrorists in planes) 5 yrs ago. The newest pics on the WTC are at least 5 yrs old.
8/23/06 4:03 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
the chief
17 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 23-Aug-06
Member Since: 01/30/2004
Posts: 8436
Explain building 7!
8/23/06 4:28 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
MR BIG1
80 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 23-Aug-06
Member Since: 07/28/2002
Posts: 13015
Downtown is correct AGAIN!
8/23/06 4:39 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
CPracer16
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 23-Aug-06
Member Since: 06/06/2006
Posts: 1244
Actually it won't be 5 years until sept 11 of 2006
8/24/06 11:15 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
CPracer16
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 24-Aug-06
Member Since: 06/06/2006
Posts: 1254
Bump
8/24/06 3:28 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
MR BIG1
80 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 24-Aug-06
Member Since: 07/28/2002
Posts: 13046
8/24/06 3:38 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
NeckSnapper
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 24-Aug-06
Member Since: 04/19/2003
Posts: 3278
So What you are saying is that Building 7 Wasn't damaged???
8/24/06 3:42 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
killer rabbit
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 24-Aug-06
Member Since: 04/20/2004
Posts: 3415
"It does not take much explosives to bring down a structure." You are an idiot if you think it wouldn't take many exposives to take down the WTC. I am trained in demolition. It would take several thousand pounds of explosives to take it down. To take it down in a truly controlled manner, several thousands of carefully placed explosives. I would need the exact size of the structural members, location, layout, etc. to make a fairly accurate estimate, but even with drilling holes in supports for the explosives, which would involve uncovering them, it would take quite a bit. To take down a structure in controlled demolitions normally takes quite a bit of time in preparation (weeks), and that is with an empty building with no need to cover the work back up. In 1993, the terrorists set off what amounted to several hundred pounds of explosives (not sure how packed the van was, but the ammonium nitrate I believe they used is fairly low yield) in the parking garage. It barely damaged the supports.
8/24/06 3:47 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
MR BIG1
80 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 24-Aug-06
Member Since: 07/28/2002
Posts: 13048
You should read more about WTC 93. Somebody was in his spot next to the support. So he left the vehicle in another spot father away from the support. I will not even mention the FBI informant that let it happen
8/24/06 3:49 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
MR BIG1
80 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 24-Aug-06
Member Since: 07/28/2002
Posts: 13049
canuck34 is correct and that would require less planning

Reply Post

This thread has been frozen.