UnderGround Forums
 

PoliticalGround >> Dems bitch slaps Bush warmongers


1/8/07 10:14 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
hubris
256 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 08-Jan-07
Member Since: 01/01/2001
Posts: 52721
 

Democrats may deny funds for Iraq surge

By DAVID ESPO, AP Special Correspondent Mon Jan 8, 6:52 PM ET WASHINGTON - In a blunt warning to the White House, congressional Democrats said Monday they may seek to deny funds for the type of short-term troop buildup that President Bush is expected to announce for Iraq Wednesday night. As Democrats began their first full week in the congressional majority, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (news, bio, voting record) said he would "look at everything" to wind down the war effort, short of cutting off support for troops already deployed. He said Bush's expected call for an additional $100 billion for the war would receive close scrutiny. "We have a platform we didn't have before, Leader Pelosi and I, and we're going to ... focus attention on this war in many different ways," said Reid, D-Nevada. Speaker Nancy Pelosi (news, bio, voting record), D-Calif., suggested over the weekend using Congress' power of the purse to restrain any troop buildup.
1/8/07 10:17 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
samichlaus
257 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 08-Jan-07 10:17 PM
Member Since: 01/01/2001
Posts: 10045
1/8/07 10:17 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
hubris
256 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 08-Jan-07
Member Since: 01/01/2001
Posts: 52722
that's right bitches!!!
1/8/07 10:18 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
samichlaus
257 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 08-Jan-07
Member Since: 01/01/2001
Posts: 10046
Yes, you are an internet troll.
1/9/07 12:21 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
drixx2
3 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09-Jan-07
Member Since: 01/01/2001
Posts: 527
"Lol, yep they'll keep sending us in but they won't give us the money for equipment, body armor etc." Lol, yea...because when Bush was spending $100,000 per second on the war, the soilders had all those things...
1/9/07 12:24 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
JoeytheTard
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09-Jan-07 12:25 AM
Member Since: 10/01/2003
Posts: 10469
"Lol, yep they'll keep sending us in but they won't give us the money for equipment, body armor etc." You seem to be grossly ignorant when it comes to how our government works. Congress doesn't send soldiers anywhere.
1/9/07 12:30 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Moke
190 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09-Jan-07
Member Since: 01/01/2001
Posts: 13147
The dems pushed like hell for a massive troop increase last year when Bush wanted to keep trying without one, and even pushed for a draft. And now that Bush fires Rumsfield and replaced all the top commanders, and wants to increase the troops, now the dems say no. The thread title should read: Dems bitchslap any hope of success (once again). Is there a single democrat that truly doubts that the dems don't want us to win, and actually want us to lose JUST so Bush will look bad? Fuck Iraq and fuck America, so long as Bush comes out the bad guy. Just come out and admit it already.
1/9/07 12:35 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
JoeytheTard
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09-Jan-07
Member Since: 10/01/2003
Posts: 10470
"The dems pushed like hell for a massive troop increase last year when Bush wanted to keep trying without one, and even pushed for a draft." Um, No and No. Single Dems pushed for either a troop increase or a draft, but they never had any significant support for either in the party. So either you are misinformed, or are retarded. Taking a page from your book, I could say that Republicans pushed last year to get laid by 16 year old congressional pages.....
1/9/07 12:45 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
BzGrappla
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09-Jan-07
Member Since: 02/27/2004
Posts: 16458
well lets set up a paypal account for teh war
1/9/07 12:47 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Moke
190 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09-Jan-07
Member Since: 01/01/2001
Posts: 13150
No, the dems spoke as a whole on troop increase, but only one pushed for the draft. Suddenly (not suprisingly) NONE want the troop increase. What a coincidence!
1/9/07 12:54 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
JoeytheTard
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09-Jan-07
Member Since: 10/01/2003
Posts: 10471
"No, the dems spoke as a whole on troop increase" Feel free to post a source showing all elected Dems supporting this. LOL "Suddenly (not suprisingly) NONE want the troop increase." Reid himself has said he may OK it, which in and of itself proves you are a clueless bastard. He is not the only one. You really are a painfully naive person. I take it you just have some really twisted "news source" you trust and just accept everything it tells you without question.
1/9/07 1:01 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
BzGrappla
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09-Jan-07
Member Since: 02/27/2004
Posts: 16463
Just set up a paypal account..it will be alright
1/9/07 1:01 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Moke
190 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09-Jan-07 01:02 AM
Member Since: 01/01/2001
Posts: 13151
lol, wow, ONE dem said he may be ok with it...actually what he said was there wasn't much he or congress could do about it, but close enough. I'm painfully naive. OK...how many dems have reversed their positions on the "surge" vs repubs? Do you even want to go there? How about how many dems voted for the war in the first place, vs those who are now against it, want to put a date on a pullout, and certainly NOT add anymore troops? Hint: zero repubs have changed any of their positions. Lieberman was forced to LEAVE the democratic party just so he could maintain his integrity on the war. Fact.
1/9/07 1:22 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
JoeytheTard
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09-Jan-07
Member Since: 10/01/2003
Posts: 10473
"lol, wow, ONE dem said he may be ok with it" Sigh... are you really this simple? MOKE SAID: "Suddenly (not suprisingly) NONE want the troop increase." ONE supporting it means you are wrong. Is this third grade logic too much for you? "how many dems have reversed their positions on the "surge" vs repubs?" What the hell are you talking about? You can't show me one Dem whose position has changed, and now you are claiming more Dems then Republicans have changed their opinions? What the hell? Republicans and Democrats are both either opposing Bush's plan, or not voicing an opinion on it. That plan is a week old. To my knowledge no one on either side has "Switched" their position on it. Feel free to provide sources of this (because we all know how you love the facts, pfft) "How about how many dems voted for the war in the first place, vs those who are now against it" Again, LOL. How the war is run just doesn't matter at all, eh? If you supported the war (in which you are sadly, sadly mistaken by the way, congress voted to give him the option of war if it was needed), then you have to support it no matter how big of a fuck up the executive branch made out of it, correct? Black and White tard thinking, to the core.
1/9/07 1:40 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Moke
190 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09-Jan-07
Member Since: 01/01/2001
Posts: 13153
"ONE supporting it means you are wrong. Is this third grade logic too much for you?" He never said he supported it, he said he couldn't stop it. So that makes NONE. Simple really. "To my knowledge no one on either side has "Switched" their position on it." Well if you can't see the wreck that's coming, I guess we'll continue the conversation opn wednesday.
1/9/07 1:51 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
JoeytheTard
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09-Jan-07
Member Since: 10/01/2003
Posts: 10474
"He never said he supported it" Reid: "If it's for a surge -- that is, for two or three months -- and it's part of a program to get us out of there as indicated by this time next year, then, sure, I'll go along with it" Moke, uninformed. Who would have thunk it. "Well if you can't see the wreck that's coming, I guess we'll continue the conversation opn wednesday." Ahh, so you are psychically predicting people switching their opinions on this matter. So your backpedals so far are: From "Dems support a draft" to "One dem supports a draft" From "Dems switched their opinions" to "Dems will switch their opinions" The funny part being, you probably don't see how you have made any mistakes. Your thinking is so warped and partisan you probably think these fundamental logical errors in thought you are making are insignificant. And of course, you wont learn anything from it, so you will never get any smarter.
1/9/07 1:58 AM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Moke
190 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09-Jan-07
Member Since: 01/01/2001
Posts: 13156
lol! wow.
1/9/07 3:16 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Jack Carter
828 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09-Jan-07
Member Since: 01/25/2004
Posts: 25161
Dems bitch slaps Bush warmongers I hate how the crazed left in America try to rephrase abandoning our troops in Iraq. Our troops need reinforcement in Iraq, but the liberals in America are taking it upon themselves to deny those reinforcements and allow our soldiers to drop like flies as they struggle to attain victory. Absolutely disgusting & alarming that we have such people in positions to run this nation.
1/9/07 3:18 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Jack Carter
828 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09-Jan-07
Member Since: 01/25/2004
Posts: 25162
Your thinking is so warped and partisan LOL @ this coming from JoeyTheTard. The epitome of pot/kettle
1/9/07 3:23 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Crazy Zimmerman
398 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09-Jan-07
Member Since: 01/01/2001
Posts: 23500
"Our troops need reinforcement in Iraq, but the liberals in America are taking it upon themselves to deny those reinforcements and allow our soldiers to drop like flies as they struggle to attain victory." Knock it off, Carter. You're full of shit. We CAN'T reinforce the troops because we don't have enough troops. That's why they're unfairly rotating the shit out of the current troops. 20k is not a reinforcement. 100k might be. The "libs" you speak of includes many Republicans now--they're also against sending more troops. The real scumbags in all this are the tough talking young men of military age who would rather fight Islamofacsim on their blogs rather than on the battlefield. They have lost the war. Not the libs.
1/9/07 3:45 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Jack Carter
828 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09-Jan-07 03:48 PM
Member Since: 01/25/2004
Posts: 25163
20k is not a reinforcement. Shame on you. Our troops need assistance and you should be ashamed of yourself for trying to spin this to make people believe that 20,000 troops to help their brothers and sisters in Iraq is not reinforcement. You're not ashamed of yourself, you're actually proud by the way you twist this issue to suit your partisan likings. Piece of shit. The real scumbags in all this are the tough talking young men of military age who would rather fight Islamofacsim on their blogs rather than on the battlefield. You prove my point: You think those people are more scumbag than those who deny sending our troops reinforcements in their time of need and literally abandoning them in the battlefield. Disgusting.
1/9/07 3:53 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Crazy Zimmerman
398 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09-Jan-07
Member Since: 01/01/2001
Posts: 23503
Lame attempt at a comeback. You should be ashamed to say "OUR" troops. I didn't want to see any of them die. I didn't want them there in the first place. But you wanted to beat off while watching war on TV. Now you see that your violence-porn is possibly going away and it upsets you. Try jerking off to sex instead of death and destruction.
1/9/07 4:04 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Tidbits
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09-Jan-07
Member Since: 01/01/2001
Posts: 3126
The same type of "surge" was tried in Viet Nam. It accomplished nothing but getting more Americans soldiers killed. "Those who refuse to learn from history are doomed to repeat it"
1/9/07 4:04 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
Information
1 The total sum of your votes up and votes down Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09-Jan-07
Member Since: 01/01/2001
Posts: 14152
The real scumbags in all this are the tough talking young men of military age who would rather fight Islamofacsim on their blogs rather than on the battlefield. The common answer. If you support it, you have to participate. Should you just admit to how dumb this type of statement is or should we start testing what you support but do not participate in? They have lost the war. Not the libs. I've heard it all, now. What a load.
1/9/07 4:07 PM
Ignore | Quote | Vote Down | Vote Up
BzGrappla
Send Private Message Add Comment To Profile

Edited: 09-Jan-07
Member Since: 02/27/2004
Posts: 16496
well info i would agree, but their another argument troops make saying how every person should be fighting like them etc.

Reply Post

You must log in to post a reply. Click here to login.