OtherGround Forums More OG maths. Let's go smart guys

Edited: 14 days ago
6/13/03
Posts: 27317

...

14 days ago
5/13/11
Posts: 56890
KGB4HD -

30. We aren't the smartest crew, are we?

Considering you got it VERY wrong....lol

14 days ago
9/13/14
Posts: 6560
FETT_Lay'n'PrayNINJA -
KGB4HD -

30. We aren't the smartest crew, are we?

Considering you got it VERY wrong....lol

Considering you also got it very wrong.....lol

14 days ago
5/13/11
Posts: 56891
VFR -
FETT_Lay'n'PrayNINJA -
The_Pundits_Ghost -
Eskimo -

100

but this isn’t a math question. This is a are you good at looking at little pictures question and how do you interpret that picture.

And you didn’t do well...

He actually nailed it. It's 100. 

 

45×2 

 

Then plus 10

 

Based on how it is laid out at least. 

How is it laid out

1st equation shows us that each pair of shoes is 20.

 

2nd equation shows us that each dancing dude is 5.

 

3rd equation shows us that each pair of glasses is 2.

 

4th equation shows us each boxing glove is 20. 

 

So for the final equation we have:

 

A single shoe = 10

A dancing guy wearing 2 gloves = 45

A pair of glasses = 2

 

Since you multiply before you add...

 

(45x2)+10= 100

 

That's how it appears laid out to me. But I am open to being shown I am wrong. 

 

14 days ago
5/13/11
Posts: 56892
KGB4HD -

Does the guy in the final equation have glasses, gloves and shoes?  I'm on phone so can't be sure.  If so, final equation would be (10 + (5+2+20+20+10+10) × 2) = 144

Ahhhhhh SNEAKY!

 

I only noticed the gloves. 

 

Well fuck me for using my phone and not blowing it up. 

14 days ago
5/13/11
Posts: 56893
VFR -
FETT_Lay'n'PrayNINJA -
KGB4HD -

30. We aren't the smartest crew, are we?

Considering you got it VERY wrong....lol

Considering you also got it very wrong.....lol

At least my math was sound, and it was just my eyes/attention to tiny details. 

Edited: 14 days ago
3/24/14
Posts: 12045
KGB4HD -

Does the guy in the final equation have glasses, gloves and shoes?  I'm on phone so can't be sure.  If so, final equation would be (10 + (5+2+20+20+10+10) × 2) = 144

NVM, had it right the first time

14 days ago
3/24/14
Posts: 12046
FETT_Lay'n'PrayNINJA -
KGB4HD -

30. We aren't the smartest crew, are we?

Considering you got it VERY wrong....lol

Hence "we"

14 days ago
5/13/11
Posts: 56896
KGB4HD -
FETT_Lay'n'PrayNINJA -
KGB4HD -

30. We aren't the smartest crew, are we?

Considering you got it VERY wrong....lol

Hence "we"

Lol. Fair!

14 days ago
1/1/01
Posts: 15686

Impossible

problem does not define a single shoe. 
 

problem assumes a single shoe is 1/2 double shoe  

 

being there is no operation shown, shoe shoe could mean shoe * shoe instead of shoe + shoe to equal 20

14 days ago
10/30/03
Posts: 23587
kungfugrip -

Impossible

problem does not define a single shoe. 
 

problem assumes a single shoe is 1/2 double shoe  

 

being there is no operation shown, shoe shoe could mean shoe * shoe instead of shoe + shoe to equal 20

Nah bro, that serial killer math. You buy two shoes they are equally valued. 

Edited: 14 days ago
10/31/05
Posts: 7774

134

*edited bc I cannot type on my phone

14 days ago
1/1/01
Posts: 15688
James Franco -
kungfugrip -

Impossible

problem does not define a single shoe. 
 

problem assumes a single shoe is 1/2 double shoe  

 

being there is no operation shown, shoe shoe could mean shoe * shoe instead of shoe + shoe to equal 20

Nah bro, that serial killer math. You buy two shoes they are equally valued. 

Equal value maybe. Both could be sq rt 20. 
 

some will also say a single shoe is significantly less than a pair which the value would be exponentially more valuable than a single shoe  

14 days ago
10/30/03
Posts: 23589
kungfugrip -
James Franco -
kungfugrip -

Impossible

problem does not define a single shoe. 
 

problem assumes a single shoe is 1/2 double shoe  

 

being there is no operation shown, shoe shoe could mean shoe * shoe instead of shoe + shoe to equal 20

Nah bro, that serial killer math. You buy two shoes they are equally valued. 

Equal value maybe. Both could be sq rt 20. 
 

some will also say a single shoe is significantly less than a pair which the value would be exponentially more valuable than a single shoe  

We get it.... You got the wrong answer.

Edited: 14 days ago
6/22/11
Posts: 2410

90? Original answer

 

214, final answer. 

14 days ago
10/29/15
Posts: 2445

8 734 and a half

14 days ago
10/3/16
Posts: 895

67

14 days ago
9/27/07
Posts: 6533
FETT_Lay'n'PrayNINJA -
VFR -
FETT_Lay'n'PrayNINJA -
The_Pundits_Ghost -
Eskimo -

100

but this isn’t a math question. This is a are you good at looking at little pictures question and how do you interpret that picture.

And you didn’t do well...

He actually nailed it. It's 100. 

 

45×2 

 

Then plus 10

 

Based on how it is laid out at least. 

How is it laid out

1st equation shows us that each pair of shoes is 20.

 

2nd equation shows us that each dancing dude is 5.

 

3rd equation shows us that each pair of glasses is 2.

 

4th equation shows us each boxing glove is 20. 

 

So for the final equation we have:

 

A single shoe = 10

A dancing guy wearing 2 gloves = 45

A pair of glasses = 2

 

Since you multiply before you add...

 

(45x2)+10= 100

 

That's how it appears laid out to me. But I am open to being shown I am wrong. 

 

This is correct

14 days ago
10/3/16
Posts: 896

79

14 days ago
1/1/01
Posts: 14336
rubbermonkey - 
FETT_Lay'n'PrayNINJA -
VFR -
FETT_Lay'n'PrayNINJA -
The_Pundits_Ghost -
Eskimo -

100

but this isn’t a math question. This is a are you good at looking at little pictures question and how do you interpret that picture.

And you didn’t do well...

He actually nailed it. It's 100. 

 

45×2 

 

Then plus 10

 

Based on how it is laid out at least. 

How is it laid out

1st equation shows us that each pair of shoes is 20.

 

2nd equation shows us that each dancing dude is 5.

 

3rd equation shows us that each pair of glasses is 2.

 

4th equation shows us each boxing glove is 20. 

 

So for the final equation we have:

 

A single shoe = 10

A dancing guy wearing 2 gloves = 45

A pair of glasses = 2

 

Since you multiply before you add...

 

(45x2)+10= 100

 

That's how it appears laid out to me. But I am open to being shown I am wrong. 

 

This is correct


No, it is not. See my earlier reply.
14 days ago
10/2/12
Posts: 11931

62x2+10=134

14 days ago
10/2/12
Posts: 11932
bakobell -

62x2+10=134

Forgot the man. 67x2+10

14 days ago
10/30/03
Posts: 23591

It's 144 or you're wrong. Try again.

14 days ago
9/13/14
Posts: 6563
rubbermonkey -
FETT_Lay'n'PrayNINJA -
VFR -
FETT_Lay'n'PrayNINJA -
The_Pundits_Ghost -
Eskimo -

100

but this isn’t a math question. This is a are you good at looking at little pictures question and how do you interpret that picture.

And you didn’t do well...

He actually nailed it. It's 100. 

 

45×2 

 

Then plus 10

 

Based on how it is laid out at least. 

How is it laid out

1st equation shows us that each pair of shoes is 20.

 

2nd equation shows us that each dancing dude is 5.

 

3rd equation shows us that each pair of glasses is 2.

 

4th equation shows us each boxing glove is 20. 

 

So for the final equation we have:

 

A single shoe = 10

A dancing guy wearing 2 gloves = 45

A pair of glasses = 2

 

Since you multiply before you add...

 

(45x2)+10= 100

 

That's how it appears laid out to me. But I am open to being shown I am wrong. 

 

This is correct

This is not correct.

There are glasses and shoes on the guy. This post doesn't mention either one.

14 days ago
4/9/10
Posts: 10317

144