OtherGround Forums Obama DOJ ordered FBI To Not Charge Hillary!

13 days ago
8/1/13
Posts: 13793

Wow!

MSM will ignore.

 

 

13 days ago
10/6/17
Posts: 2908

That’s huge. It really propels the notion that the Obama DOJ unfairly went after Trump. If they’re willing to corruptly clear one of their own, then they’re probably willing to conduct a “witch hunt” on opposition.

13 days ago
8/1/13
Posts: 13795

 

13 days ago
10/15/13
Posts: 27916

In

13 days ago
3/3/18
Posts: 7009
She pushed back against the suggestion that the FBI "blew over" potentially charging Clinton with gross negligence under the Espionage Act, saying officials did consider it -- but decided that the move would be too "constitutionally vague," unprecedented, and "that they did not feel that they could sustain a charge."



yawn
13 days ago
10/16/10
Posts: 27278
Obstruction of justice?
13 days ago
12/29/09
Posts: 23547
You are a bore for sure. Why did you buy a blue name? For what possible reason? Are you going to contribute some funny, interesting stuff going forward. Or are you just going to keep doing the only thing you do here? Wallet $30 lighter.
13 days ago
5/12/03
Posts: 21257
Ill Portents - She pushed back against the suggestion that the FBI "blew over" potentially charging Clinton with gross negligence under the Espionage Act, saying officials did consider it -- but decided that the move would be too "constitutionally vague," unprecedented, and "that they did not feel that they could sustain a charge."



yawn

You are a real life walking yawn.
13 days ago
10/6/17
Posts: 2909
Ill Portents - She pushed back against the suggestion that the FBI "blew over" potentially charging Clinton with gross negligence under the Espionage Act, saying officials did consider it -- but decided that the move would be too "constitutionally vague," unprecedented, and "that they did not feel that they could sustain a charge."



yawn

Minus the fact that the Obama DOJ told the FBI that they wouldn’t prosecute anyway. And that was before they even interviewed Clinton. It’s impossible to make charges stick when you know that prosecutors aren’t going to do their job.

Yawn all you want, but this is HUGE and corrupt to the core. 

13 days ago
2/8/08
Posts: 3029
This thread will include the following words:

Triggered
Goal Post
Orange
Shill
Sheep
Trumptard
Neckbeards
TDS
ButObama
ButHillary
ButTrump
13 days ago
10/17/06
Posts: 2248

But.....but.....Hillary......Obama......repeat lol.

 

 

Triggered

 

Maga 

 

Kag

13 days ago
1/2/15
Posts: 6887

Will give it a read. Sounds too juicy to be true 

13 days ago
10/15/13
Posts: 27919
SeattlesbigDprolapsedME - This thread will include the following words:

Triggered
Goal Post
Orange
Shill
Sheep
Trumptard
Neckbeards
TDS
ButObama
ButHillary
ButTrump

nailed it....next post proved you correct

13 days ago
6/27/05
Posts: 24788

Hmmmmm

13 days ago
5/10/08
Posts: 43176
SeattlesbigDprolapsedME - This thread will include the following words:

Triggered
Goal Post
Orange
Shill
Sheep
Trumptard
Neckbeards
TDS
ButObama
ButHillary
ButTrump

Ha.  Should be the requisite first post for every political thread.

13 days ago
2/9/19
Posts: 234

coruption

13 days ago
2/9/19
Posts: 235
lionsoul -
SeattlesbigDprolapsedME - This thread will include the following words:

Triggered
Goal Post
Orange
Shill
Sheep
Trumptard
Neckbeards
TDS
ButObama
ButHillary
ButTrump

Ha.  Should be the requisite first post for every political thread.

why must it be that way 

can we grow up an talk like men   ?

Edited: 13 days ago
3/23/07
Posts: 58586

The FBI doesn't charge people...that's what prosecutors do. The FBI can make a recommendation to the prosecutors, but that's about it.

13 days ago
8/1/13
Posts: 13797
saglv -

The FBI doesn't charge people...that's what prosecutors do. The FBI can make a recommendation to the prosecutors, but that's about it.

OK, now we are doing semantics?

OBAMA DOJ ordered FBI to not recommend to prosecutors that Hillary be charged....better?

13 days ago
8/1/13
Posts: 13798

https://www.theepochtimes.com/exclusive-doj-prevented-fbi-from-pursuing-gross-negligence-charges-against-clinton_2815097.html

EXCLUSIVE: DOJ Prevented FBI From Pursuing Gross Negligence Charges Against Clinton

Early in the Hillary Clinton email case, the Department of Justice reached a decision that would have far-reaching implications for the FBI’s investigation into Clinton’s use of a private email server.

The Justice Department (DOJ), under then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch, decided to set an unusually high threshold for prosecuting Clinton, effectively ensuring from the outset that she would not be charged.

In order for Clinton to be prosecuted, the DOJ required the FBI to establish evidence of intent—even though the gross negligence statute explicitly does not require this.

This meant that the FBI would have needed to find a smoking gun, such as an email or an admission made during FBI questioning, that revealed Clinton or her aides knowingly set up the private email server to send classified information.

Clinton was famously exonerated by FBI Director James Comey in a July 5, 2016, press conference, which immediately became the subject of controversy.

Notably, Comey had been convinced to remove the term “gross negligence” to describe Clinton’s actions from his prepared statement by, among others, FBI lawyer Lisa Page, FBI agent Peter Strzok, senior legal counsel Trisha Anderson, and FBI analyst Jonathan Moffa.

Because of Comey’s statement, many have mistakenly concluded that the FBI acted independently from DOJ influence in its investigation of Clinton. Congressional testimonies by high-ranking FBI officials involved in the investigation reveal, however, that this was not the case.

13 days ago
3/3/18
Posts: 7010
The Jentleman -
Ill Portents - She pushed back against the suggestion that the FBI "blew over" potentially charging Clinton with gross negligence under the Espionage Act, saying officials did consider it -- but decided that the move would be too "constitutionally vague," unprecedented, and "that they did not feel that they could sustain a charge."



yawn

Minus the fact that the Obama DOJ told the FBI that they wouldn’t prosecute anyway. And that was before they even interviewed Clinton. It’s impossible to make charges stick when you know that prosecutors aren’t going to do their job.

Yawn all you want, but this is HUGE and corrupt to the core. 

"the Obama DOJ told the FBI that they wouldn’t prosecute anyway"

 

Is that in the transcript?

13 days ago
3/23/07
Posts: 58588
camicom - 
saglv -

The FBI doesn't charge people...that's what prosecutors do. The FBI can make a recommendation to the prosecutors, but that's about it.

OK, now we are doing semantics?

OBAMA DOJ ordered FBI to not recommend to prosecutors that Hillary be charged....better?


I don't consider it a semantic difference, I consider it a meaningful difference. If you don't want people to correct you when you're wrong, do a better job at not being wrong.

13 days ago
11/9/10
Posts: 66090
I'm shocked...




Said no one rational.
13 days ago
8/18/13
Posts: 19299

TTT

13 days ago
3/16/11
Posts: 5608
camicom -
saglv -

The FBI doesn't charge people...that's what prosecutors do. The FBI can make a recommendation to the prosecutors, but that's about it.

OK, now we are doing semantics?

OBAMA DOJ ordered FBI to not recommend to prosecutors that Hillary be charged....better?

So the DOJ ordered the FBI to not reccomend pressing charges to the DOJ? That seems odd, doesnt it?