OtherGround Forums Real Collusion: Google Gave Hillary 2.6M Votes!

8/19/19 3:54 PM
8/1/13
Posts: 19165

The number could be as high as 10M

Russian collusion wasn't real but this certainly is.

Google Expert to Senator Cruz: 15 Million 2020 Votes At Risk

Big Tech’s biggest threat to democracy isn’t censorship or privacy: it’s election manipulation.

At a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, “Google and Censorship through Search Engines,” Dr. Robert Epstein, who researches the impact of Google, informed the hearing that “upwards of 15 million votes” were in jeopardy in the 2020 election. During his testimony, Epstein told Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) that in 2016, Google gave at least 2.6 million votes to Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, “through bias and search results.” He stressed that was the lowest number.

When questioned further by Cruz, Epstein gave a more concise answer: “The range is between 2.6 and 10.4 million votes depending on how aggressive they were in using the techniques that I’ve been studying, such as the search engine manipulation effect, the search suggestion effect, the answer bot effect, and a number of others. They control these and no one can counteract them. These are not competitive. These are tools that they have at their disposal exclusively.”

 

8/19/19 5:14 PM
1/1/01
Posts: 60637

Not surprised,  google will double down this election like the execs said they would

Edited: 8/19/19 5:16 PM
11/20/13
Posts: 8644

Context, because I know the OG needs it:

 

By the way, it is not just conservative content that gets censored (Epstein, 2018h). At times, Google also censors progressive and socialist content. The problem with Google is not that it censors conservatives; the problem is that it has the power to determine what content billions of people worldwide will or not see. No single entity – especially a private company that is not accountable to the public – should have such power (Epstein, 2016d).

8/19/19 5:17 PM
1/2/15
Posts: 8171

In for spin!

8/19/19 5:24 PM
5/13/11
Posts: 51895
Junnk -

In for spin!

Crimecorn's OP is the actual spin. 

 

Epstien is a butthurt Google hater who has been after them since 2012 because they rightfully put a warning on search results for his site that said it had walware. 

 

He later  admitted the site was infected, but tried to blame Google for not fixing it. Lmfao.

 

But of course this one biased "reasearcher" is correct about google swaying voters towards Hillary, and all the other rrsearch that shows Google results pushed people towards pro-Trump sites (even fake russian sites) are #fakenews according to the hypothetical OP. 

 

Good times. 

8/19/19 5:25 PM
1/1/01
Posts: 29291

Lol

the google “expert” has had a beef with google for years

https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/one-mans-fight-with-google-over-a-security-warning/

8/19/19 5:26 PM
11/20/13
Posts: 8645

Maybe he has GDS?

8/19/19 5:29 PM
3/13/17
Posts: 8005

 

8/19/19 5:30 PM
6/26/06
Posts: 11999
Pratty - 

Lol

the google “expert” has had a beef with google for years

https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/one-mans-fight-with-google-over-a-security-warning/


On a serious note, are you familiar with the penalty for treason, and do you really think the liberal media & tech attempted coup will go unpunished?

Even online supporters and agitators will be held accountable for their crimes. Every last single one.
8/19/19 5:30 PM
3/13/17
Posts: 8006

Hill-dawg with the KO

8/19/19 5:31 PM
3/13/17
Posts: 8007

REEEE! Election was rigged for Hillary! Even tho trump won? Lmao. 

 

8/19/19 5:31 PM
8/1/13
Posts: 19168
Pedro Navaja -

 

You mean President Hillary?

8/19/19 5:33 PM
1/1/01
Posts: 29292
RenatoCocopreta -
Pratty - 

Lol

the google “expert” has had a beef with google for years

https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/one-mans-fight-with-google-over-a-security-warning/


On a serious note, are you familiar with the penalty for treason, and do you really think the liberal media & tech attempted coup will go unpunished?

Even online supporters and agitators will be held accountable for their crimes. Every last single one.

lol. Are you for real?

8/19/19 5:40 PM
6/26/06
Posts: 12001
Pratty - 
RenatoCocopreta -
Pratty - 

Lol

the google “expert” has had a beef with google for years

https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/one-mans-fight-with-google-over-a-security-warning/


On a serious note, are you familiar with the penalty for treason, and do you really think the liberal media & tech attempted coup will go unpunished?

Even online supporters and agitators will be held accountable for their crimes. Every last single one.

lol. Are you for real?


Ask anybody.
8/19/19 5:44 PM
1/1/01
Posts: 29293
RenatoCocopreta -
Pratty - 
RenatoCocopreta -
Pratty - 

Lol

the google “expert” has had a beef with google for years

https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/one-mans-fight-with-google-over-a-security-warning/


On a serious note, are you familiar with the penalty for treason, and do you really think the liberal media & tech attempted coup will go unpunished?

Even online supporters and agitators will be held accountable for their crimes. Every last single one.

lol. Are you for real?


Ask anybody.

And Kirik is wondering why the OG is dying

....pussies acting tough making threats

8/19/19 5:45 PM
11/11/11
Posts: 7927

The only thing this tells me is that Hillary Derangement Syndrome is alive and well in Trumpland.

Get over it, Trump won - not the popular vote, of course, but the one that counts, move on with your lives. I'd say it's getting creepy but Trump and his minions passed that threshold about 2 1/2 years ago.

Scary thing is the full-blown meltdown, at minimum, Trump and his cultists will have when he loses '20. Naturally, it'll be all Hillary's fault.

8/19/19 6:04 PM
5/13/11
Posts: 51896
Pedro Navaja -

 

Holy fuck is that a real tweet by the Hill dog? 

8/19/19 6:20 PM
12/4/08
Posts: 1661
FETT_Lay'n'PrayNINJA -
Junnk -

In for spin!

Crimecorn's OP is the actual spin. 

 

Epstien is a butthurt Google hater who has been after them since 2012 because they rightfully put a warning on search results for his site that said it had walware. 

 

He later  admitted the site was infected, but tried to blame Google for not fixing it. Lmfao.

 

But of course this one biased "reasearcher" is correct about google swaying voters towards Hillary, and all the other rrsearch that shows Google results pushed people towards pro-Trump sites (even fake russian sites) are #fakenews according to the hypothetical OP. 

 

Good times. 

Except that an actual google insider went public and confirmed all this prior to this news. 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1VeElBAeas

8/19/19 6:21 PM
6/26/06
Posts: 12003
FETT_Lay'n'PrayNINJA - 
Pedro Navaja -

 

Holy fuck is that a real tweet by the Hill dog? 


She definitely pulled out her bottle of hot sauce for that one.
8/19/19 6:32 PM
6/22/17
Posts: 91
To the average reader it appears that Google made a mistake and switched voter results. However, it actually looks like Google simply supplied information and search results that were beneficial to Clinton. Is this the gist?
8/19/19 6:57 PM
7/26/12
Posts: 31661

Up at ten, I googled trump and somehow ended up a Hilary supporter. 

 

 

8/19/19 7:30 PM
5/13/11
Posts: 51897
The Leg Collector -
FETT_Lay'n'PrayNINJA -
Junnk -

In for spin!

Crimecorn's OP is the actual spin. 

 

Epstien is a butthurt Google hater who has been after them since 2012 because they rightfully put a warning on search results for his site that said it had walware. 

 

He later  admitted the site was infected, but tried to blame Google for not fixing it. Lmfao.

 

But of course this one biased "reasearcher" is correct about google swaying voters towards Hillary, and all the other rrsearch that shows Google results pushed people towards pro-Trump sites (even fake russian sites) are #fakenews according to the hypothetical OP. 

 

Good times. 

Except that an actual google insider went public and confirmed all this prior to this news. 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1VeElBAeas

I didn't finish the full 20 minutes but didn't see anything in the 1st half that "confirmed" that google actually gave votes to Hillary. 

 

I did however, listen to the OG for 2 years saying that social media and the internet cannot influence voters when they were defending the accusations that Russian websites and bots were influencing the election. 

 

But hey, if this one Epstien dude makes a claim based off a 21 person study, it must be fact now!

8/19/19 8:01 PM
9/2/09
Posts: 4105

Lol you guys will believe anything that fits in with your narrative

8/19/19 8:08 PM
6/3/03
Posts: 102016
Pedro Navaja -

 

While I think HRC is the queen of cunts, that shit was savage!!!!!

8/19/19 8:09 PM
7/26/12
Posts: 31663
FETT_Lay'n'PrayNINJA -
The Leg Collector -
FETT_Lay'n'PrayNINJA -
Junnk -

In for spin!

Crimecorn's OP is the actual spin. 

 

Epstien is a butthurt Google hater who has been after them since 2012 because they rightfully put a warning on search results for his site that said it had walware. 

 

He later  admitted the site was infected, but tried to blame Google for not fixing it. Lmfao.

 

But of course this one biased "reasearcher" is correct about google swaying voters towards Hillary, and all the other rrsearch that shows Google results pushed people towards pro-Trump sites (even fake russian sites) are #fakenews according to the hypothetical OP. 

 

Good times. 

Except that an actual google insider went public and confirmed all this prior to this news. 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1VeElBAeas

I didn't finish the full 20 minutes but didn't see anything in the 1st half that "confirmed" that google actually gave votes to Hillary. 

 

I did however, listen to the OG for 2 years saying that social media and the internet cannot influence voters when they were defending the accusations that Russian websites and bots were influencing the election. 

 

But hey, if this one Epstien dude makes a claim based off a 21 person study, it must be fact now!

This too