OtherGround Forums Special Counsel for Trump/Russia Megathread

Edited: 9/25/20 8:36 PM
1/25/04
Posts: 137786

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/09/24/secret_report_how_cias_brennan_overruled_dissenting_analysts_who_thought_russia_favored_hillary_125315.html

 

Former CIA Director John Brennan personally edited a crucial section of the intelligence report on Russian interference in the 2016 election and assigned a political ally to take a lead role in writing it after career analysts disputed Brennan's take that Russian leader Vladimir Putin intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump clinch the White House, according to two senior U.S. intelligence officials who have seen materials detailing Brennan’s role in drafting the document.

 

The explosive conclusion Brennan inserted into the report was used to help justify continuing the Trump-Russia “collusion” investigation, which had been launched by the FBI in 2016. It was picked up after the election by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who in the end found no proof that Trump or his campaign conspired with Moscow.

The Obama administration publicly released a de version of the report — known as the "Intelligence Community Assessment on Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent Elections (ICA)” — just two weeks before Trump took office, casting a cloud of suspicion over his presidency. Democrats and national media have cited the report to suggest Russia influenced the 2016 outcome and warn that Putin is likely meddling again to reelect Trump.

The ICA is a key focus of U.S. Attorney John Durham’s ongoing investigation into the origins of the “collusion” probe. He wants to know if the intelligence findings were juiced for political purposes.

RealClearInvestigations has learned that one of the CIA operatives who helped Brennan draft the ICA, Andrea Kendall-Taylor, financially supported Hillary Clinton during the campaign and is a close colleague of Eric Ciaramella, identified last year by RCI as the Democratic national security “whistleblower" whose complaint led to Trump’s impeachment, ending in Senate acquittal in January.

The two officials said Brennan, who openly supported Clinton during the campaign, excluded conflicting evidence about Putin’s motives from the report, despite objections from some intelligence analysts who argued Putin counted on Clinton winning the election and viewed Trump as a “wild card.”

The dissenting analysts found that Moscow preferred Clinton because it judged she would work with its leaders, whereas it worried Trump would be too unpredictable. As secretary of state, Clinton tried to “reset” relations with Moscow to move them to a more positive and cooperative stage, while Trump campaigned on expanding the U.S. military, which Moscow perceived as a threat.

These same analysts argued the Kremlin was generally trying to sow discord and disrupt the American democratic process during the 2016 election cycle. They also noted that Russia tried to interfere in the 2008 and 2012 races, many years before Trump threw his hat in the ring.

“They complained Brennan took a thesis [that Putin supported Trump] and decided he was going to ignore dissenting data and exaggerate the importance of that conclusion, even though they said it didn’t have any real substance behind it,” said a senior U.S intelligence official who participated in a 2018 review of the spycraft behind the assessment, which President Obama ordered after the 2016 election.

He elaborated that the analysts said they also came under political pressure to back Brennan’s judgment that Putin personally ordered "active measures” against the Clinton campaign to throw the election to Trump, even though the underlying intelligence was “weak."

The review, conducted by the House Intelligence Committee, culminated in a lengthy report that was and locked in a Capitol basement safe soon after Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff took control of the committee in January 2019.

The official said the committee spent more than 1,200 hours reviewing the ICA and interviewing analysts involved in crafting it, including the chief of Brennan’s so-called “fusion cell,” which was the interagency analytical group Obama's top spook stood up to look into Russian influence operations during the 2016 election.

Durham is said to be using the long-hidden report, which runs 50-plus pages, as a road map in his investigation of whether the Obama administration politicized intelligence while targeting the Trump campaign and presidential transition in an unprecedented investigation involving wiretapping and other secret surveillance.

The special prosecutor recently interviewed Brennan for several hours at CIA headquarters after obtaining his emails, call logs and other documents from the agency. Durham has also quizzed analysts and supervisors who worked on the ICA.

A spokesman for Brennan said that, according to Durham, he is not the target of a criminal investigation and  “only a witness to events that are under review.”  Durham’s office did not respond to requests for comment.

The senior intelligence official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters, said former senior CIA political analyst Kendall-Taylor was a key member of the team that worked on the ICA. A Brennan protégé, she donated hundreds of dollars to Clinton’s 2016 campaign, federal records show. In June, she gave $250 to the Biden Victory Fund.

Kendall-Taylor and Ciaramella entered the CIA as junior analysts around the same time and worked the Russia beat together at CIA headquarters in Langley, Va. From 2015 to 2018, Kendall-Taylor was detailed to the National Intelligence Council, where she was deputy national intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia. Ciaramella succeeded her in that position at NIC, a unit of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence that  oversees the CIA and the other intelligence agencies.

It’s not clear if Ciaramella also played a role in the drafting of the January 2017 assessment. He was working in the White House as a CIA detailee at the time. The CIA declined comment.

Kendall-Taylor did not respond to requests for comment, but she recently defended the ICA as a national security expert in a CBS “60 Minutes” interview on Russia’s election activities, arguing it was a slam-dunk case “based on a large body of evidence that demonstrated not only what Russia was doing, but also its intent. And it's based on a number of different sources, collected human intelligence, technical intelligence.”

But the secret congressional review details how the ICA, which was hastily put together over 30 days at the direction of Obama intelligence czar James Clapper, did not follow longstanding rules for crafting such assessments. It was not farmed out to other key intelligence agencies for their input, and did not include an annex for dissent, among other extraordinary departures from past tradecraft.

 

10/3/20 4:42 PM
9/6/17
Posts: 656

Bump for PSL

10/3/20 5:03 PM
12/5/17
Posts: 12840
Trotskyshammer - 

Bump for PSL


You mean a bump for Cuck to make some sort of coherent, supported argument. 

10/5/20 5:09 AM
1/25/04
Posts: 138236

10/5/20 10:00 AM
3/15/06
Posts: 24939
Jack Carter -

haha, look at that smirk.

10/7/20 8:14 PM
1/12/07
Posts: 24046

Mr NN4

 

10/7/20 8:47 PM
2/4/09
Posts: 14987
SpunQ -

Mr NN4

 

Yeah he wrote about it in his book and ice already posted his letter. 

 

Dude has been spot on. Most reliable person doing the media tour. 

10/8/20 8:39 PM
1/25/04
Posts: 138400

10/8/20 8:39 PM
1/25/04
Posts: 138401

10/8/20 8:48 PM
1/1/01
Posts: 16584

LOL this thread is humiliating to the Muh Russia pushers. Why did little peon people like myself know this was bullshit the entire time?! 

 

LOL fools got played!!! 

10/9/20 7:54 AM
1/2/15
Posts: 11732

Haha I love this conspiracy thread started by the biggest conspiracy nutbag on this site :) 

10/14/20 1:57 PM
2/4/09
Posts: 15307

Hello!

 

10/14/20 1:59 PM
11/18/15
Posts: 7947
Pumpkin Spice Lazarus -
Trotskyshammer - 

Bump for PSL


You mean a bump for Cuck to make some sort of coherent, supported argument. 

easy

everything psl said was a bunch of bullshit.

 

proof: see the thread

really wasn't that difficult

10/14/20 2:00 PM
4/24/07
Posts: 44239
LOL! This is killing me. Didn't think we would see this again.

https://twitter.com/Unclesa91623885/status/1316422181853818882
10/14/20 5:25 PM
2/4/09
Posts: 15326

Fuck not one of us got it right

 

10/14/20 6:07 PM
2/4/09
Posts: 15329
NoNeed4aScreenName -

Fuck not one of us got it right

 

Key passage 

 

Campaign finance law prohibits foreign political contributions to campaigns for public office. A financial tie between a sitting president and a foreign country could also have explosive national security consequences.

 

10/15/20 10:07 AM
2/4/09
Posts: 15369

Rick gates breaks silence..... mueller was nothing more than a figurehead...

 

 

Mueller 'rarely mentioned' during investigation

Gates suggested the investigation itself was largely political, an affair in which Mueller was reportedly little more than a figurehead.

"Robert Mueller was literally nonexistent during my almost 1,000 hours of cooperation with his office," Gates told John Solomon. "And it wasn't just that he was nonexistent in his physical presence ... He was rarely mentioned in any of the interviews. There was no discussion of needing, you know, to talk to Bob Mueller, or anything by the prosecutors."

 

10/15/20 10:08 AM
2/4/09
Posts: 15370

Weissman feeling trapped lately?

 

It was weissman that did lead the prosecution against gates though....

 

Instead, Gates said, the investigation seemed to be run largely by Andrew Weissmann. A former FBI general counsel and former chief of the criminal fraud division at the Justice Department, Weissmann joined Mueller, his old boss at the FBI, as his key lieutenant in the special counsel investigation

10/29/20 12:35 PM
1/12/07
Posts: 24856

10/29/20 12:37 PM
2/4/09
Posts: 15928
SpunQ -

Further ahead in all the investigations. 

10/30/20 5:08 PM
1/25/04
Posts: 139199

https://dailycaller.com/2020/10/30/key-source-steele-dossier-identified/

 

A ‘Key’ Source For A Debunked Claim In The Steele Dossier Has Been Identified

 

  • Olga Galkina, a Russian public relations specialist, has been identified as a source for the Steele dossier’s most direct allegation of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government. 
  • Galkina was a sub-source for Igor Danchenko, a Russian analyst who provided information to Christopher Steele.
  • A former national security official confirmed to The Wall Street Journal that Galkina was a source for Danchenko. 
  • A Russian tech executive who Galkina accused of working with Russian hackers has called her a “disgruntled and unstable” former employee.

 

In addition to the allegations against Gubarev, the dossier memo also asserted that a Russian man named Seva Kaptsugovich took part in the hacks of Democrats’ computer networks.

Kaptsugovich was likely not involved in the cyber attacks, McClatchy reported in 2017. The news outlet reported that Kaptsugovich had been in prison since 2013 on child pornography charges.

Edited: 10/30/20 5:20 PM
2/4/09
Posts: 15956

They just dismissed the case against orbis from gubarev today 

10/30/20 5:55 PM
2/4/09
Posts: 15958

10/30/20 6:02 PM
2/4/09
Posts: 15959

Very interesting. 1982

 

10/31/20 12:32 PM
2/4/09
Posts: 15987

 

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's office gathered evidence suggesting that Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee launched a political "smear job" in spring 2016 tying Donald Trump to Russia collusion through the lobbying work of his campaign chairman Paul Manafort in Ukraine, according to memos that were excluded from the prosecutor's final report.