OtherGround Forums Trump blocks ambass from testifying about perfect

Edited: 6 days ago
3/3/18
Posts: 10716

Totally transparent. Very legal and very cool. 

The WH has directed EU Ambassador Sondland not to testify today. 

Sondland is the guy running point on the Ukraine stuff, which was weird since he is the EU Ambassador and Bill Taylor is the Ukraine ambassador. 

When Taylor texted Sondland to ask if the aid was dependent on these investigations being opened, Sondland is the guy who said "call me". 

When, a week after that, Taylor referred back to that call and said "it's crazy that we're exchanging this aid for help with a political campaign", Sondland talked to Trump and came back with the rehearsed "you misunderstood, there is no quid pro quo....also, don't talk about this over text".

Sondland is also the guy who told Repub Senator Ron Johnson that the deal absolutely was quid pro quo. 

He also donated $1 million to Trump's inauguration. 

6 days ago
5/2/14
Posts: 3245

Good

Fuck you

Hope this helps

6 days ago
1/2/15
Posts: 8664

All just coincidences 

Right? 

6 days ago
12/29/09
Posts: 27423

Nice. OP is a head bobber and a hand jobber. 

6 days ago
1/1/01
Posts: 22645

Perfect call. Imperfect 3 months of discussions and texts.

6 days ago
12/10/18
Posts: 1043
kingofpancakes80 -

Nice. OP is a head bobber and a hand jobber. 

Ad hominems won't make the impeachment inquiry go away. 

6 days ago
3/18/02
Posts: 88823
LieDetector - 
kingofpancakes80 -

Nice. OP is a head bobber and a hand jobber. 

Ad hominems won't make the impeachment inquiry go away. 


impeachment inquiry is not a real thing

why wont they put it to a vote?  

hmmm lol

another nothingburger that will go nowhere

keep at it blue team.  No one respects you and you will lose. 

6 days ago
6/3/03
Posts: 102690

In for 

6 days ago
6/27/05
Posts: 26303

Good - fuck the lunatic left

6 days ago
12/16/11
Posts: 14605

You need a tissue you whiny ass, spiral-less pussy?

6 days ago
1/13/11
Posts: 22622
Nitecrawler -

In for 

For what???? 
 

 

 

 

don’t leave me hanging here!!!!

 

 

 

 

 

oh, when are they starting the impeachment inquiry? You know, the real deal show all legit and shit?

6 days ago
1/25/04
Posts: 129701

Good. Hold a vote to start a real impeachment inquiry first

6 days ago
1/1/01
Posts: 26794
Ill Portents - 

Totally transparent. Very legal and very cool. 

The WH has directed EU Ambassador Sondland not to testify today. 

Sondland is the guy running point on the Ukraine stuff, which was weird since he is the EU Ambassador and Bill Taylor is the Ukraine ambassador. 

When Taylor texted Sondland to ask if the aid was dependent on these investigations being opened, Sondland is the guy who said "call me". 

When, a week after that, Taylor referred back to that call and said "it's crazy that we're exchanging this aid for help with a political campaign", Sondland talked to Trump and came back with the rehearsed "you misunderstood, there is no quid pro quo....also, don't talk about this over text".

Sondland is also the guy who told Repub Senator Ron Johnson that the deal absolutely was quid pro quo. 

He also donated $1 million to Trump's inauguration. 


You're a fraud and a liar.

After the jab about political motivations the ACTUAL reply was this:

"[9/9/19, 5:19:35 AM] Gordon Sondland: Bill, I believe you are incorrect about President Trump’s intentions. The President has been crystal clear: no quid pro quo’s of any kind. The President is trying to evaluate whether Ukraine is truly going to adopt the transparency and reforms that President Zelensky promised during his campaign. I suggest we stop the back and forth by text. If you still have concerns. I recommend you give Lisa Kenna or S a call to discuss them directly. Thanks."



YOU , the fucking fraud, cunt, douchebag, bloated piece of shit said this was his statement:

"you misunderstood, there is no quid pro quo....also, don't talk about this over text"


Even a barely functional retard like you can see the difference in the way you're trying to characterize things.

You are the embodiment of all the fake-news, blind rage Trump haters...
6 days ago
1/25/04
Posts: 129702


 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/intel-community-inspector-general-stonewalls-congress-refuses-to-explain-why-he-backdated-secret-changes-to-whistleblower-form/

 

Intel Community Inspector General Stonewalls Congress – Refuses to Explain Why He Backdated Secret Changes to Whistleblower Form

 

The ICIG secretly gutted the whistleblower complaint form in September to include second-hand knowledge and water cooler gossip to support allegations of misconduct.

 

The ICIG then backdated the whistleblower rules and allowed the complaint form filled out by the CIA officer on August 12 to qualify under the new rules.

Atkinson refused to explain why he allowed this to happen.

The Federalist reported:

In tense testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) on Friday, the inspector general for federal spy agencies refused to disclose why his office backdated secret changes to key whistleblower forms and rules in the wake of an anti-Trump whistleblower complaint filed in August, sources told The Federalist.

Michael Atkinson, the intelligence community inspector general, told HPSCI lawmakers during a committee oversight hearing on Friday that the whistleblower forms and rules changes were made in September, even though the new forms and guidance, which were not uploaded to the ICIG’s website until September 24, state that they were changed in August. Despite having a full week to come up with explanations for his office’s decisions to secretly change its forms to eliminate the requirement for first-hand evidence and to backdate those changes to August, Atkinson refused to provide any explanation to lawmakers baffled by his behavior.

Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson released a statement last month addressing the changes.

 

In the letter Atkinson admitted the changes to the form were made at the time of the partisan CIA leaker’s complaint.

The ICIG also admitted that it changed its own whistleblower rules *because of the anti-Trump complaint* from the CIA spy:

In June 2019, the newly hired Director for the Center for Protected Disclosures entered on duty. Thus, the Center for Protected Disclosures has been reviewing the forms provided to whistleblowers who wish to report information with respect to an urgent concern to the congressional intelligence committees. In the process of reviewing and clarifying those forms, and in response to recent press inquiries regarding the instant whistleblower complaint, the ICIG understood that certain language in those forms and, more specifically, the informational materials accompanying the forms, could be read – incorrectly – as suggesting that whistleblowers must possess first-hand information in order to file an urgent concern complaint with the congressional intelligence committees.

6 days ago
3/18/02
Posts: 88824
billyball2 - 
Ill Portents - 

Totally transparent. Very legal and very cool. 

The WH has directed EU Ambassador Sondland not to testify today. 

Sondland is the guy running point on the Ukraine stuff, which was weird since he is the EU Ambassador and Bill Taylor is the Ukraine ambassador. 

When Taylor texted Sondland to ask if the aid was dependent on these investigations being opened, Sondland is the guy who said "call me". 

When, a week after that, Taylor referred back to that call and said "it's crazy that we're exchanging this aid for help with a political campaign", Sondland talked to Trump and came back with the rehearsed "you misunderstood, there is no quid pro quo....also, don't talk about this over text".

Sondland is also the guy who told Repub Senator Ron Johnson that the deal absolutely was quid pro quo. 

He also donated $1 million to Trump's inauguration. 


You're a fraud and a liar.

After the jab about political motivations the ACTUAL reply was this:

"[9/9/19, 5:19:35 AM] Gordon Sondland: Bill, I believe you are incorrect about President Trump’s intentions. The President has been crystal clear: no quid pro quo’s of any kind. The President is trying to evaluate whether Ukraine is truly going to adopt the transparency and reforms that President Zelensky promised during his campaign. I suggest we stop the back and forth by text. If you still have concerns. I recommend you give Lisa Kenna or S a call to discuss them directly. Thanks."



YOU , the fucking fraud, cunt, douchebag, bloated piece of shit said this was his statement:

"you misunderstood, there is no quid pro quo....also, don't talk about this over text"


Even a barely functional retard like you can see the difference in the way you're trying to characterize things.

You are the embodiment of all the fake-news, blind rage Trump haters...

nothing he and his team says or produces, no detail will ever invalidate the fact that like russia (that he and his band of retards yelled about for almost 3 years, now are silent like little children put in their place), this is all fake BS designed to unseat an elected POTUS

dont lose sight of this. 

Its all bullshit. 

dont get worked up over his words, they literally mean nothing 

6 days ago
3/23/07
Posts: 59946
BigEyedFish - 
LieDetector - 
kingofpancakes80 -

Nice. OP is a head bobber and a hand jobber. 

Ad hominems won't make the impeachment inquiry go away. 


impeachment inquiry is not a real thing

why wont they put it to a vote?  

hmmm lol

another nothingburger that will go nowhere

keep at it blue team.  No one respects you and you will lose. 


"impeachment inquiry is not a real thing

why wont they put it to a vote?"

 

 

The entire purpose of the inquiry is to....inquire into whether or not impeachable offenses had occurred.

What happens next is dependant on the results of that inquiry.

6 days ago
1/25/04
Posts: 129703
6 days ago
3/3/18
Posts: 10718
billyball2 - 
Ill Portents - 

Totally transparent. Very legal and very cool. 

The WH has directed EU Ambassador Sondland not to testify today. 

Sondland is the guy running point on the Ukraine stuff, which was weird since he is the EU Ambassador and Bill Taylor is the Ukraine ambassador. 

When Taylor texted Sondland to ask if the aid was dependent on these investigations being opened, Sondland is the guy who said "call me". 

When, a week after that, Taylor referred back to that call and said "it's crazy that we're exchanging this aid for help with a political campaign", Sondland talked to Trump and came back with the rehearsed "you misunderstood, there is no quid pro quo....also, don't talk about this over text".

Sondland is also the guy who told Repub Senator Ron Johnson that the deal absolutely was quid pro quo. 

He also donated $1 million to Trump's inauguration. 


You're a fraud and a liar.

After the jab about political motivations the ACTUAL reply was this:

"[9/9/19, 5:19:35 AM] Gordon Sondland: Bill, I believe you are incorrect about President Trump’s intentions. The President has been crystal clear: no quid pro quo’s of any kind. The President is trying to evaluate whether Ukraine is truly going to adopt the transparency and reforms that President Zelensky promised during his campaign. I suggest we stop the back and forth by text. If you still have concerns. I recommend you give Lisa Kenna or S a call to discuss them directly. Thanks."



YOU , the fucking fraud, cunt, douchebag, bloated piece of shit said this was his statement:

"you misunderstood, there is no quid pro quo....also, don't talk about this over text"


Even a barely functional retard like you can see the difference in the way you're trying to characterize things.

You are the embodiment of all the fake-news, blind rage Trump haters...

You are lying. My account was 100% accurate.

 

Sept 1:

Taylor: Are we now saying that security assistance and WH meeting are conditioned on investigations?

Sondland: Call me

.....in other words, it's clear there that there is quid pro quo and Sondland doesn't want to talk about it over text. This is verified by Republican Senator Ron Johnson, who has confirmed that Sondland told him "the release of U.S. aid to Ukraine was contingent on an investigation desired by President Trump and his allies".

THEN, a week later:

 

Sept 9:

Taylor: As I said on the phone I think it’s crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.

.....in other words, Sondland had confirmed on the earlier call that it was a quid pro quo deal AND was specifically for Trump's "political campaign", and Taylor had protested.

THEN, after a gap in which it has been confirmed that Sondland called Trump:

Sondland: Bill, I believe you are incorrect about President Trump’s intentions. The President has been crystal clear no quid pro quo’s of any kind. The President is trying to evaluate whether Ukraine is truly going to adopt the transparency and reforms that President Zelensky promised during his campaign. I suggest we stop the back and forth by text

 

....so in other words Trump told him not to admit it was quid pro quo, at least not over texts.

 

 

Hope this helps.

 

Edited: 6 days ago
12/10/18
Posts: 1045
Jack Carter -


 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/intel-community-inspector-general-stonewalls-congress-refuses-to-explain-why-he-backdated-secret-changes-to-whistleblower-form/

 

Intel Community Inspector General Stonewalls Congress – Refuses to Explain Why He Backdated Secret Changes to Whistleblower Form

 

The ICIG secretly gutted the whistleblower complaint form in September to include second-hand knowledge and water cooler gossip to support allegations of misconduct.

 

The ICIG then backdated the whistleblower rules and allowed the complaint form filled out by the CIA officer on August 12 to qualify under the new rules.

Atkinson refused to explain why he allowed this to happen.

The Federalist reported:

In tense testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) on Friday, the inspector general for federal spy agencies refused to disclose why his office backdated secret changes to key whistleblower forms and rules in the wake of an anti-Trump whistleblower complaint filed in August, sources told The Federalist.

Michael Atkinson, the intelligence community inspector general, told HPSCI lawmakers during a committee oversight hearing on Friday that the whistleblower forms and rules changes were made in September, even though the new forms and guidance, which were not uploaded to the ICIG’s website until September 24, state that they were changed in August. Despite having a full week to come up with explanations for his office’s decisions to secretly change its forms to eliminate the requirement for first-hand evidence and to backdate those changes to August, Atkinson refused to provide any explanation to lawmakers baffled by his behavior.

Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson released a statement last month addressing the changes.

 

In the letter Atkinson admitted the changes to the form were made at the time of the partisan CIA leaker’s complaint.

The ICIG also admitted that it changed its own whistleblower rules *because of the anti-Trump complaint* from the CIA spy:

In June 2019, the newly hired Director for the Center for Protected Disclosures entered on duty. Thus, the Center for Protected Disclosures has been reviewing the forms provided to whistleblowers who wish to report information with respect to an urgent concern to the congressional intelligence committees. In the process of reviewing and clarifying those forms, and in response to recent press inquiries regarding the instant whistleblower complaint, the ICIG understood that certain language in those forms and, more specifically, the informational materials accompanying the forms, could be read – incorrectly – as suggesting that whistleblowers must possess first-hand information in order to file an urgent concern complaint with the congressional intelligence committees.

This post is a whole lot of nothing.

 

How, specifically, was the whistleblower complaint form "gutted" in September?

 

Your long as fuck post doesn't actually say what was changed on the form.

Why is that?

 

 

 

6 days ago
1/1/01
Posts: 8637
saglv -
BigEyedFish - 
LieDetector - 
kingofpancakes80 -

Nice. OP is a head bobber and a hand jobber. 

Ad hominems won't make the impeachment inquiry go away. 


impeachment inquiry is not a real thing

why wont they put it to a vote?  

hmmm lol

another nothingburger that will go nowhere

keep at it blue team.  No one respects you and you will lose. 


"impeachment inquiry is not a real thing

why wont they put it to a vote?"

 

 

The entire purpose of the inquiry is to....inquire into whether or not impeachable offenses had occurred.

What happens next is dependant on the results of that inquiry.

They’ve already decided, based on their public statements. 

They are full of shit, just like Ill Portents. 
 

 

6 days ago
11/4/10
Posts: 13355


Hope this helps
6 days ago
8/1/13
Posts: 20354
FerrisWheeler -

Good

Fuck you

Hope this helps

This. They have zero supoena power, and are refusing to release testimony from witnesses.

FUCK EM!

LOL!

6 days ago
4/27/15
Posts: 13309

Good - fuck 'em.  Sondland is on the record that Trump was crystal clear about no QPQ.  Fuck letting these snakes go on a fishing expedition based on bullshit.

 

6 days ago
8/1/13
Posts: 20355
KZTT_MMAfan55 -


Hope this helps

They did this so they could hold the hearings in secret. Total scam.

FUCK EM!

 

6 days ago
6/1/10
Posts: 15337
BigEyedFish -
LieDetector - 
kingofpancakes80 -

Nice. OP is a head bobber and a hand jobber. 

Ad hominems won't make the impeachment inquiry go away. 


impeachment inquiry is not a real thing

why wont they put it to a vote?  

hmmm lol

another nothingburger that will go nowhere

keep at it blue team.  No one respects you and you will lose. 

Hold a vote to decide to start an inquiry to determine whether or not to start an investigation?

Sounds efficient