OtherGround Forums Trump jr retweets whistleblower's name

29 days ago
7/31/19
Posts: 855

 

29 days ago
7/31/19
Posts: 856

 

29 days ago
4/27/15
Posts: 14150

And?

Edited: 29 days ago
7/31/19
Posts: 857

Everyone knows who the whistleblower is.. hopefully he comes out now as a result. Republicans are going to rip him and schiff a new asshole because of his anti trump history and backing of dems like biden, etc

29 days ago
6/6/02
Posts: 19451
That name has been thrown around for at least 2-3 weeks now.

That's old news.
29 days ago
3/17/03
Posts: 16857
His name has been out for like 2 weeks.

Are we pretending this is doxxing?
Edited: 29 days ago
7/31/19
Posts: 858
Black Dougie -

And?

dems are going full retard now for him doing it but at the same time dont want to bring attention to the whistleblower being named . Its pretty funny

29 days ago
6/2/14
Posts: 2255

Outing a whistleblower is about as low as it gets.  There are protections for them for a reason.  What a piece of shit.


Anyone who thinks this was a decent thing to do needs their head examined.

29 days ago
7/31/19
Posts: 859
fanat - That name has been thrown around for at least 2-3 weeks now.

That's old news.

No shit. But no one has had the balls to bring up his name in a mainstream level like don jr..in fear of being sued

29 days ago
1/1/01
Posts: 93932
dignan -

Outing a whistleblower is about as low as it gets.  There are protections for them for a reason.  What a piece of shit.


Anyone who thinks this was a decent thing to do needs their head examined.

Fuck the law ! Dox him!

Edited: 29 days ago
7/31/19
Posts: 860
dignan -

Outing a whistleblower is about as low as it gets.  There are protections for them for a reason.  What a piece of shit.


Anyone who thinks this was a decent thing to do needs their head examined.

Guy Is not a real wb . Im glad they fooled you that he is. schiff lied about not meeting him before he did. Do you really not think this isnt russian collusion 2.0? fuck that guy. They changed the rules to allow second hand whistleblowing right before. Wb also got multiple things wrong after trump released the transcript. And he is connected to the anti trump dossier. Dems didnt expect that coming out. why do you think they are doing shady shit excluding the republicans on most things..its because once they know who  the whistleblower is, dems will get butchered. That is why they were angling for a second wb. Blind men can see this. if you dont see that dems will go through the lowest of lows for power after what they did to kavanaugh. You are a lost cause. if someone hates trump, fine,..but dont overlook the bullshit dems are trying to pull

29 days ago
8/22/08
Posts: 5334
dignan - 

Outing a whistleblower is about as low as it gets.  There are protections for them for a reason.  What a piece of shit.


Anyone who thinks this was a decent thing to do needs their head examined.


Those protections don't extend to the media who outed the guy.

Funny thing is it was the NYT who leaked the name. You know the NYT who is left leaning.
29 days ago
6/13/03
Posts: 24817

alleged

29 days ago
1/1/01
Posts: 93933
Coil3623 -
dignan -

Outing a whistleblower is about as low as it gets.  There are protections for them for a reason.  What a piece of shit.


Anyone who thinks this was a decent thing to do needs their head examined.

Guy Is not a real wb . Im glad they fooled you that he is. schiff lied about not meeting him before he did. Do you really not think this isnt russian collusion 2.0? fuck that guy. They changed the rules to allow second hand whistleblowing right before. Wb also got multiple things wrong after trump released the transcript. And he is connected to the anti trump dossier. Dems didnt expect that coming out. why do you think they are doing shady shit excluding the republicans on most things..its because once they know who  the whistleblower is, dems will get butchered. That is why they were angling for a second wb. Blind men can see this. if you dont see that dems will go through the lowest of lows for power after what they did to kavanaugh. You are a lost cause. if someone hates trump, fine,..but dont overlook the bullshit dems are trying to pull

Yea

...legally he is a real whistleblower

29 days ago
11/11/11
Posts: 8216
Coil3623 -
dignan -

Outing a whistleblower is about as low as it gets.  There are protections for them for a reason.  What a piece of shit.


Anyone who thinks this was a decent thing to do needs their head examined.

Guy Is not a real wb . Im glad they fooled you that he is. schiff lied about not meeting him before he did. Do you really not think this isnt russian collusion 2.0? fuck that guy. They changed the rules to allow second hand whistleblowing right before. Wb also got multiple things wrong after trump released the transcript. And he is connected to the anti trump dossier. Dems didnt expect that coming out. why do you think they are doing shady shit excluding the republicans on most things..its because once they know who  the whistleblower is, dems will get butchered. That is why they were angling for a second wb. Blind men can see this. if you dont see that dems will go through the lowest of lows for power after what they did to kavanaugh. You are a lost cause. if someone hates trump, fine,..but dont overlook the bullshit dems are trying to pull

You've got it backwards, the reason why the GOP and Trump are fixated on outing the WB is because they can't attack the substance of the WB's complaint, it's almost entirely been verified by witness testimony in the inquiry.

Love Trump all you want, fine, but don't try and deflect from the facts by focusing on whether the WB met with Schiff (which he didn't btw, I clarified for you below) or the revelation of a potential second WB.

"(The WB contacted a House Staff member) The House staff member, following the committee’s procedures, suggested the [whistleblower] find a lawyer to advise him and meet with an inspector general, with whom he could file a whistle-blower complaint. The aide shared some of what the officer conveyed to Mr. Schiff. The aide did not share the whistle-blower’s identity with Mr. Schiff, an official said."

 

 

29 days ago
1/1/01
Posts: 5067

Good to see someone fighting back against the ongoing attempted coup.  

29 days ago
6/13/03
Posts: 24818
kevsh -
Coil3623 -
dignan -

Outing a whistleblower is about as low as it gets.  There are protections for them for a reason.  What a piece of shit.


Anyone who thinks this was a decent thing to do needs their head examined.

Guy Is not a real wb . Im glad they fooled you that he is. schiff lied about not meeting him before he did. Do you really not think this isnt russian collusion 2.0? fuck that guy. They changed the rules to allow second hand whistleblowing right before. Wb also got multiple things wrong after trump released the transcript. And he is connected to the anti trump dossier. Dems didnt expect that coming out. why do you think they are doing shady shit excluding the republicans on most things..its because once they know who  the whistleblower is, dems will get butchered. That is why they were angling for a second wb. Blind men can see this. if you dont see that dems will go through the lowest of lows for power after what they did to kavanaugh. You are a lost cause. if someone hates trump, fine,..but dont overlook the bullshit dems are trying to pull

You've got it backwards, the reason why the GOP and Trump are fixated on outing the WB is because they can't attack the substance of the WB's complaint, it's almost entirely been verified by witness testimony in the inquiry.

Love Trump all you want, fine, but don't try and deflect from the facts by focusing on whether the WB met with Schiff (which he didn't btw, I clarified for you below) or the revelation of a potential second WB.

"(The WB contacted a House Staff member) The House staff member, following the committee’s procedures, suggested the [whistleblower] find a lawyer to advise him and meet with an inspector general, with whom he could file a whistle-blower complaint. The aide shared some of what the officer conveyed to Mr. Schiff. The aide did not share the whistle-blower’s identity with Mr. Schiff, an official said."

 

 

Then let him testtestifywhat you claim under oath. Funny how he is getting cold feet and saying he wont testify now.

29 days ago
1/1/01
Posts: 93934
Sogsteel -
kevsh -
Coil3623 -
dignan -

Outing a whistleblower is about as low as it gets.  There are protections for them for a reason.  What a piece of shit.


Anyone who thinks this was a decent thing to do needs their head examined.

Guy Is not a real wb . Im glad they fooled you that he is. schiff lied about not meeting him before he did. Do you really not think this isnt russian collusion 2.0? fuck that guy. They changed the rules to allow second hand whistleblowing right before. Wb also got multiple things wrong after trump released the transcript. And he is connected to the anti trump dossier. Dems didnt expect that coming out. why do you think they are doing shady shit excluding the republicans on most things..its because once they know who  the whistleblower is, dems will get butchered. That is why they were angling for a second wb. Blind men can see this. if you dont see that dems will go through the lowest of lows for power after what they did to kavanaugh. You are a lost cause. if someone hates trump, fine,..but dont overlook the bullshit dems are trying to pull

You've got it backwards, the reason why the GOP and Trump are fixated on outing the WB is because they can't attack the substance of the WB's complaint, it's almost entirely been verified by witness testimony in the inquiry.

Love Trump all you want, fine, but don't try and deflect from the facts by focusing on whether the WB met with Schiff (which he didn't btw, I clarified for you below) or the revelation of a potential second WB.

"(The WB contacted a House Staff member) The House staff member, following the committee’s procedures, suggested the [whistleblower] find a lawyer to advise him and meet with an inspector general, with whom he could file a whistle-blower complaint. The aide shared some of what the officer conveyed to Mr. Schiff. The aide did not share the whistle-blower’s identity with Mr. Schiff, an official said."

 

 

Then let him testtestifywhat you claim under oath. Funny how he is getting cold feet and saying he wont testify now.

He doesn't need to testify 

Everything he said has been corroborated by the testimony of others.

 

What purpose would his testimony serve ? 

29 days ago
4/8/13
Posts: 2531
Sogsteel -
kevsh -
Coil3623 -
dignan -

Outing a whistleblower is about as low as it gets.  There are protections for them for a reason.  What a piece of shit.


Anyone who thinks this was a decent thing to do needs their head examined.

Guy Is not a real wb . Im glad they fooled you that he is. schiff lied about not meeting him before he did. Do you really not think this isnt russian collusion 2.0? fuck that guy. They changed the rules to allow second hand whistleblowing right before. Wb also got multiple things wrong after trump released the transcript. And he is connected to the anti trump dossier. Dems didnt expect that coming out. why do you think they are doing shady shit excluding the republicans on most things..its because once they know who  the whistleblower is, dems will get butchered. That is why they were angling for a second wb. Blind men can see this. if you dont see that dems will go through the lowest of lows for power after what they did to kavanaugh. You are a lost cause. if someone hates trump, fine,..but dont overlook the bullshit dems are trying to pull

You've got it backwards, the reason why the GOP and Trump are fixated on outing the WB is because they can't attack the substance of the WB's complaint, it's almost entirely been verified by witness testimony in the inquiry.

Love Trump all you want, fine, but don't try and deflect from the facts by focusing on whether the WB met with Schiff (which he didn't btw, I clarified for you below) or the revelation of a potential second WB.

"(The WB contacted a House Staff member) The House staff member, following the committee’s procedures, suggested the [whistleblower] find a lawyer to advise him and meet with an inspector general, with whom he could file a whistle-blower complaint. The aide shared some of what the officer conveyed to Mr. Schiff. The aide did not share the whistle-blower’s identity with Mr. Schiff, an official said."

 

 

Then let him testtestifywhat you claim under oath. Funny how he is getting cold feet and saying he wont testify now.

The substance of the complaint has been corroborated many times over, including by Trump allies Sondland (who just reversed his testimony under threat of perjury) and Mulvaney, who admitted to EXACTLY what the whistleblower alleged.

Please explain why the whistleblower needs to testify in light of the many confirmations of the complaint already heard by Congress and the public, other than for the purpose of making his identity public so that he and his family can field death threats from Trump supporters till God knows when?

29 days ago
6/13/03
Posts: 24819
sekundarburnes -
Sogsteel -
kevsh -
Coil3623 -
dignan -

Outing a whistleblower is about as low as it gets.  There are protections for them for a reason.  What a piece of shit.


Anyone who thinks this was a decent thing to do needs their head examined.

Guy Is not a real wb . Im glad they fooled you that he is. schiff lied about not meeting him before he did. Do you really not think this isnt russian collusion 2.0? fuck that guy. They changed the rules to allow second hand whistleblowing right before. Wb also got multiple things wrong after trump released the transcript. And he is connected to the anti trump dossier. Dems didnt expect that coming out. why do you think they are doing shady shit excluding the republicans on most things..its because once they know who  the whistleblower is, dems will get butchered. That is why they were angling for a second wb. Blind men can see this. if you dont see that dems will go through the lowest of lows for power after what they did to kavanaugh. You are a lost cause. if someone hates trump, fine,..but dont overlook the bullshit dems are trying to pull

You've got it backwards, the reason why the GOP and Trump are fixated on outing the WB is because they can't attack the substance of the WB's complaint, it's almost entirely been verified by witness testimony in the inquiry.

Love Trump all you want, fine, but don't try and deflect from the facts by focusing on whether the WB met with Schiff (which he didn't btw, I clarified for you below) or the revelation of a potential second WB.

"(The WB contacted a House Staff member) The House staff member, following the committee’s procedures, suggested the [whistleblower] find a lawyer to advise him and meet with an inspector general, with whom he could file a whistle-blower complaint. The aide shared some of what the officer conveyed to Mr. Schiff. The aide did not share the whistle-blower’s identity with Mr. Schiff, an official said."

 

 

Then let him testtestifywhat you claim under oath. Funny how he is getting cold feet and saying he wont testify now.

The substance of the complaint has been corroborated many times over, including by Trump allies Sondland (who just reversed his testimony under threat of perjury) and Mulvaney, who admitted to EXACTLY what the whistleblower alleged.

Please explain why the whistleblower needs to testify in light of the many confirmations of the complaint already heard by Congress and the public, other than for the purpose of making his identity public so that he and his family can field death threats from Trump supporters till God knows when?

There are multiple things that have not been corroborated including Barr's involvment within the claim.

Edited: 29 days ago
7/31/19
Posts: 861

Lol the complaint by wb said there was a quid pro quo. Of course there wasnt. Trump releasing the transcript ruined that bullshit. There was with biden, but that doesnt fit the narrative. some of you have 0 clue what you are talking about but talk like you do. I find that amusing

29 days ago
3/1/10
Posts: 9599

The name was publicly leaked over a week ago in a RealClearInvestigations piece.

 

Beltway journos have known the identity for over a month.

 

Don Jr. tweeting out a Breitbart link is not newsworthy.

Edited: 29 days ago
7/31/19
Posts: 862
VTCO -

The name was publicly leaked over a week ago in a RealClearInvestigations piece.

 

Beltway journos have known the identity for over a month.

 

Don Jr. tweeting out a Breitbart link is not newsworthy.

We all know this. But the fact that someone with as many followers as don jr spreading this info to those that dont,...msm cant ignore it. That is the point of the thread

29 days ago
11/18/15
Posts: 4926
dignan -

Outing a whistleblower is about as low as it gets.  There are protections for them for a reason.  What a piece of shit.


Anyone who thinks this was a decent thing to do needs their head examined.

many whistleblowers end up exposed and in jail, this is nothing out of the ordinary.

29 days ago
11/18/15
Posts: 4927
kevsh -
Coil3623 -
dignan -

Outing a whistleblower is about as low as it gets.  There are protections for them for a reason.  What a piece of shit.


Anyone who thinks this was a decent thing to do needs their head examined.

Guy Is not a real wb . Im glad they fooled you that he is. schiff lied about not meeting him before he did. Do you really not think this isnt russian collusion 2.0? fuck that guy. They changed the rules to allow second hand whistleblowing right before. Wb also got multiple things wrong after trump released the transcript. And he is connected to the anti trump dossier. Dems didnt expect that coming out. why do you think they are doing shady shit excluding the republicans on most things..its because once they know who  the whistleblower is, dems will get butchered. That is why they were angling for a second wb. Blind men can see this. if you dont see that dems will go through the lowest of lows for power after what they did to kavanaugh. You are a lost cause. if someone hates trump, fine,..but dont overlook the bullshit dems are trying to pull

You've got it backwards, the reason why the GOP and Trump are fixated on outing the WB is because they can't attack the substance of the WB's complaint, it's almost entirely been verified by witness testimony in the inquiry.

Love Trump all you want, fine, but don't try and deflect from the facts by focusing on whether the WB met with Schiff (which he didn't btw, I clarified for you below) or the revelation of a potential second WB.

"(The WB contacted a House Staff member) The House staff member, following the committee’s procedures, suggested the [whistleblower] find a lawyer to advise him and meet with an inspector general, with whom he could file a whistle-blower complaint. The aide shared some of what the officer conveyed to Mr. Schiff. The aide did not share the whistle-blower’s identity with Mr. Schiff, an official said."

 

 

There is no substance to the whistleblowers claims.  So far it has been pretty much thoroughly debunked that trump did anything wrong, and that is with the one-sided star chamber investigation going on.