OtherGround Forums Ugly Ocasio-Cortez tucks to Ben Shapiro MAGA!

8 days ago
12/12/12
Posts: 5836

Get a load of this gay!

 

Democratic congressional candidate Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Thursday dismissed an offer from conservative commentator Ben Shapiro challenging her to a debate, saying she doesn’t “owe a response to unsolicited requests from men with bad intentions.”

“Just like catcalling, I don’t owe a response to unsolicited requests from men with bad intentions,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted Thursday night. “And also like catcalling, for some reason they feel entitled to one.”

 

 

Shapiro fired back at Ocasio-Cortez on Twitter while defending his offer:

 

 

Shapiro said during a segment on "The Ben Shapiro Show” on Wednesday that he would donate $10,000 to Ocasio-Cortez’s campaign if she agreed to debate him.

 

“You’ve noted that you think Republicans are afraid to debate you or talk to you or discuss the issues with you. Not only am I eager to discuss the issues with you, I’m willing to offer $10,000 to your campaign today for you to come on our Sunday special," Shapiro said on his show.

Ocasio-Cortez’s upset win over long-time Rep. Joe Crowley (D-N.Y.) in the primary for New York's 14th Congressional District in June sent shockwaves through the Democratic Party.

A self-described democratic socialist, Ocasio-Cortez is running on a platform that includes “Medicare-for-all” and abolishing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

8 days ago
8/12/09
Posts: 4911

lol, pulling the sexist card? Propping this girl up was a big mistake for the dems.

8 days ago
1/1/01
Posts: 40616
dustynothing -

lol, pulling the sexist card? Propping this girl up was a big mistake for the dems.

Well, it's the same party that propped up Hillary 

7 days ago
2/25/06
Posts: 1652

Cortez lost a 'conversation' with a liberal host (Chris Cuomo) when he asked her a simple question about Pelosi. She is not prepared for any sort of debate with a credible adversary.

 

7 days ago
1/1/01
Posts: 23953
he would tool her very badly. she is right to be afraid of him.
7 days ago
1/2/15
Posts: 5187

Liberals know their ideas can't withstand an assault of facts 

7 days ago
2/2/15
Posts: 5608

"Republicans won't debate me"

*Gets offer from republican to debate her*

"How dare you offer to debate me unsolicited after I essentially issued a challenge that you are afraid to debate me!"

7 days ago
7/25/13
Posts: 9243

She’s a low level national politician. Both her supporters and critics are giving her way too much attention. 

7 days ago
8/18/13
Posts: 18453

TTT

7 days ago
6/12/13
Posts: 5080
19 -

She’s a low level national politician. Both her supporters and critics are giving her way too much attention. 

When one her supporters is someone like bernie sanders, who has a shit load of supporters himself, i think the amount of critics giving her attention to break her down is justified, no?

7 days ago
2/12/17
Posts: 2931
I wonder how many low iq leftists would applaud the statement from the cross eyed cunt, rather than seeing through her trying to shield herself from debate via bringing up sexism in a circumstance where it had 0 reason to even be mentioned.

I imagine millions would admire her "intellect" and "bravery," but its those millions that are dictating policy for the left. Millions of stupid mother fuckers.
7 days ago
12/25/15
Posts: 1556

I get she’s duplicitous and all but why fall her a cross eyed cunt. 

 

You know how the right says the left pushes people to trump. Well this rhetoric pushes people to the left. 

7 days ago
1/25/04
Posts: 123348
19 -

She’s a low level national politician. Both her supporters and critics are giving her way too much attention. 

The chairman for the DNC called her the future of the party. 

7 days ago
7/25/13
Posts: 9244
Jack Carter -
19 -

She’s a low level national politician. Both her supporters and critics are giving her way too much attention. 

The chairman for the DNC called her the future of the party. 

Meaning that she is young, progressive, and speaking to a new generation of voters. She may be someone of influence in the future, but she is low level at this point. She is more of a symbol of progressive resistance than a power player at this point. Both sides are reacting to this.

7 days ago
7/25/13
Posts: 9245
Spider Rico -
19 -

She’s a low level national politician. Both her supporters and critics are giving her way too much attention. 

When one her supporters is someone like bernie sanders, who has a shit load of supporters himself, i think the amount of critics giving her attention to break her down is justified, no?

I’m not taking sides on her views, but you are correct in that if she wasn’t seen as a threat, her critics wouldn’t be as loud. 

7 days ago
10/15/13
Posts: 24248
19 -
Jack Carter -
19 -

She’s a low level national politician. Both her supporters and critics are giving her way too much attention. 

The chairman for the DNC called her the future of the party. 

Meaning that she is young, progressive, and speaking to a new generation of voters. She may be someone of influence in the future, but she is low level at this point. She is more of a symbol of progressive resistance than a power player at this point. Both sides are reacting to this.

"Progressive resistance"

Image result for adam sandler laughing gif

 

7 days ago
1/1/01
Posts: 8333

Ben has a crush on her....

 

7 days ago
4/30/18
Posts: 223
The Accountant -

I get she’s duplicitous and all but why fall her a cross eyed cunt. 

 

You know how the right says the left pushes people to trump. Well this rhetoric pushes people to the left. 

I agree 100%. It's one thing to not like her or her policies etc. Calling her a "cross eyed cunt" is disgusting. 

Edited: 7 days ago
10/15/13
Posts: 24249
Memphis81 -
The Accountant -

I get she’s duplicitous and all but why fall her a cross eyed cunt. 

 

You know how the right says the left pushes people to trump. Well this rhetoric pushes people to the left. 

I agree 100%. It's one thing to not like her or her policies etc. Calling her a "cross eyed cunt" is disgusting. 

One idiot poster called her that. Don't group everyone who thinks she is in way over her head with that moran.

Edited: 7 days ago
2/22/09
Posts: 11576

She's a dumbass who would get raped by a professional debater like Shapiro.

She needs to debate another dumbass.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez vs Donald Trump would be a fair match-up IMO.

7 days ago
11/15/04
Posts: 35157

She will either fade into obscurity or become the next Maxine Waters. There is no inbetween. 

7 days ago
10/15/13
Posts: 24250
yabadaba -

She's a dumbass who would get raped by a professional debater like Shapiro.

She needs to debate another dumbass.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez vs Donald Trump would be a fair match-up IMO.

He would destroy her.

7 days ago
1/1/01
Posts: 23685
Since when do candidates debate journalists / pundits? They don't. At best she could agree to an interview with certain parameters and discussion points.

Her comparison of Shapiro to a catcaller was a low blow, but it played right to her base.

If you don't like it when she plays to her base but you do like it when Trump plays to his, then you're half of what is wrong with this country.
7 days ago
4/27/15
Posts: 9000
yabadaba -

She's a dumbass who would get raped by a professional debater like Shapiro.

She needs to debate another dumbass.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez vs Donald Trump would be a fair match-up IMO.

LOL.  It would be like Trump curb-stomping a kitten

7 days ago
2/22/09
Posts: 11577
Al Cappucino - 
yabadaba -

She's a dumbass who would get raped by a professional debater like Shapiro.

She needs to debate another dumbass.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez vs Donald Trump would be a fair match-up IMO.

He would destroy her.


Each side would claim victory. There might not be a lot of substance but it would be very entertaining.