If it ain't Dutch, it ain't much -
the whole procedure is setup so WADA/USADA has no responsebility during the drugs test, cause if they touch the bottle and the athlete test positive, the blame it on the collection company, in this case USADA.
Pettis doesn't stand a chance suing USADA over this, cause he signed the WADA code, including a waiver, you can't sue USADA and the UFC over drug testing
USADA are responsible for the equipment the force the fighters to use. They are 100% liable.
no fucking way, it isn't their equipment. Suing will set back Pettis in lawyer costs
100% it's their equipment, just because they didn't mfg the bottle does not mean they dont have to take responsibility if they require a fighter to use it and fighter cuts themselves.
nope, maybe Pettis can sue the manufacturer, but thats it, its poring money down the drain
I build chairs.
Your restaurant buy my chairs.
Your employees do not maintain the chair to standard.
Customer sits on chair, chair breaks, customer falls and breaks his angus.
Customer will sue your pants off and break your angus.
You can try and sue me and you could win if you can prove my chairs have a history of breaking but since you have been buying my chairs since the beginning and that's the first instance of a break, my lawyer will break your angus too.