UnderGround Forums Who's the toughest/grittiest fighter of all time?

9/13/19 4:23 PM
7/16/13
Posts: 623
jetsteragain -
jetsteragain - 
Bigtrain2681 - 
jetsteragain - I cant believe anyone would have the IGNORANCE to even mention Connors name in this thread....MR Tap 2 TIMES!!

Sure he has shown some toughness but he has also shown the will to give up....2 TIMES!!

4 times. 


Really???

Pre UFC???

yes I know the 3rd to the fighter omg I have a brin dump and cant remember his name ….leg lock I believe??

whats the 4th??

Joe Duffy?

Edited: 9/13/19 4:25 PM
12/14/15
Posts: 4421
jetsteragain -
jetsteragain - 
Bigtrain2681 - 
jetsteragain - I cant believe anyone would have the IGNORANCE to even mention Connors name in this thread....MR Tap 2 TIMES!!

Sure he has shown some toughness but he has also shown the will to give up....2 TIMES!!
 

4 times. 


Really???

Pre UFC???

yes I know the 3rd to the fighter omg I have a brin dump and cant remember his name ….leg lock I believe??

whats the 4th??

The kneebar was from a russian, can’t remember the name. Duffy choked him. 

9/13/19 4:39 PM
3/12/15
Posts: 2904
Bigtrain2681 -
The Lion King -
Bigtrain2681 -
The Lion King -
Bigtrain2681 -
CloakedStar -
Bigtrain2681 -
The Lion King -
Bigtrain2681 -
The Lion King -
Bigtrain2681 -
The Lion King -
Bigtrain2681 -
The Lion King -

Look at bigtrains last 2 posts. I didn't even say anything but he still rephrased himself back to back because he's on auto-pilot from being so used to repeating himself after getting destroyed. He repeats himself after his arguments get debunked because he thinks doubling down changes the fact that he got proven wrong. 

Sorry, little buddy, but repeating opinions that have already been refuted doesn't change the fact that they've been refuted. You can double down all you want, but at the end of the day you've still been proven wrong.

Rather than repeating myself and destroying the same arguments I already destroyed; I'll just accept your concessions on all the points you didn't reply to.

Little bud. 

Or..the shitty app didn’t show my post. So I posted again. Pretty much exactly the same thing. Because it’s easy to retort a fool like yourself. 

‘Destroyed’. Ok boy. Did you get confused which account you were using there you sad cunt. 

You haven’t even attempted to retort anything I said. You just disagreed and posted your emotional opinions without any logic or arguments to support them. 

You are by far the worst debater I’ve ever encountered here (and that’s saying something).

I would say worst poster, but at least you don’t give off a creepy stalker vibe like Peterjansen/flyingocto. That dude was on some silence of the lambs shit posting creepy comments from a porn dungeon somewhere. Whereas you’re just retarded and harmless.  

You continually run in circles. You do understand all you have given is your own opinion right?

Which seems to go by ‘if you get finished it proves you tried harder’. Lol. You’re a retard. You’re probably right, it’s impossible to truly debate with someone that lacks knowledge or understanding of the subject in hand. That describes you to a T.

I expect you recently found a BJJ or Thai gym and now think you understand far more than your level. 

Get back in your lane boy. You’re embarrassing yourself. 

I explained my arguments in detail and gave my expert analysis of multiple fights while you just stated you disagreed without explanation.

You were mentally dominated and outsmarted by my big brain. 

You stated your arguments as fact and became upset when your ‘facts’ were shown to be retarded. 

Nothing new there. 

Getting the last word won’t change the fact that you were given a verbal beat down and proven wrong in dominant fashion.

You got wrecked! Now get out of here, kiddo. 

Rinse. Repeat. Rinse. Repeat. 

You don’t understand what you’re even attempting to argue. 

You’re ‘facts’ are laughable. Your logic that of child that doesn’t get what he’s seeing. 

You keep saying you ‘destroyed’ or ‘schooled me’ when arguing pure subjective interpretation show your level. 

Again, nothing new from you or your other accounts. 

Sorry bigtrain I don’t agree with everything he’s saying but you’re not putting up an argument. 

Getting finished in an area you didn’t choose to be in - Hughes/Serra vs GSP, Mcgregor vs Khabib - doesn’t make you grittier than lasting a fight where you’re made to fight - Iaquinta vs Khabib. 

I’ve put this across many times in this thread. Again, it’s subjective. Your interpretation may not be mine. Neither can state ‘facts’ on the subject. 

Who said they chose to be under GSP? I said they got finished because they put themselves in bad situations by actually engaging in offense rather than being content with playing purely defensively and stalling to a decision loss like some of GSPs lesser opponents. Al fought so passively and defensively that he let Khabib look like Muhammad Ali. It’s a lot easier to defend takedowns and submissions when you’re playing all defense and no offense (I.e. stalling)

Not sure how much more I can simplify this anymore for your tiny brain. Maybe you should hit up a gym and actually train before discussing MMA because you’re clearly lost. 

The reason they were under him is because he chose to shoot. It had fuck all to do with them. The same as anyone that ever fought him. 

He dictated where the fight took place. Not quite sure how you’re missing that numbnuts. But I’m guessing you never actually witnessed GSP other than YT highlights. 

Al is a wrestler. That was fighting a better wrestler. His best chance was standing. 

What else could Mcgregor of possibly done vs Khabib other than go for a finish standing? Enlighten me. Should he of unleashed his renowned BJJ game? Demonstrated his top heavy wrestling game? 

You need to understand what you’re watching before you argue it soppy bollocks. 

Your post literally has 0 correlation with mine. You just repeated yourself on the GSP topic so instead of copy pasting I'll just tell you to read to post you replied to for a rebuttal. 

What does Conor changing his gameplan have to do with this conversation? You legit need to see a psychologist because you're arguing with yourself at this point. 

You seem to have trouble with reading comprehension so here's a simplified version of my argument without examples to back it up: "It’s a lot easier to defend takedowns and submissions when you’re playing all defense and no offense (I.e. stalling)"

Can you try comprehending that?

Or are you going to go on another autistic tangent about how GSP has the ability to take people down and other topics that have nothing to do with what I'm saying. 

The whole thing was rebuttal to you bringing up how Diaz looked worse than Hughes/Serra/Bisping. That was YOUR example. 

But ok. So what should Iaquinta have done vs a better wrestler on a weeks notice? Mcgregor had months and months to prepare for Khabib and got ragdolled and finished. Yet from that you act like he went out on his shield. He didn’t. He went out exactly how it was expected should he not land a flash KO. Mcgregor fought Khabib the only possible way he had the option. Otherwise Khabib did what the fuck he wanted. 

Do you honestly believe for a second Mcgregor did not try with every ounce of his being to avoid being taken down? Rewatch the fight, he had success in a round which Khabib basically took off. Then..back to being rag dolled. 

Are you suggesting, with YOUR original examples, Hughes wanted any part of getting taken down by Gsp so decided to go all in standing?

Nice try you joke. 

I summed everything up into 1 sentence and you still didn’t even address it lol

Everything you asked about GSP and Khabibs victims was answered in my previous posts. 

Work on that reading comprehension, little guy.