What if ... FBI acknowledges Controlled Demolition of WTC

6/16/11 10:30 PM
1/1/01
Posts: 23370
 I hope you are at least a well paid shill    

I've said it before and I'll say it again. . . if I'm supposed to be getting paid then someone from accounting needs to give me a fucking call cause I haven't seen a dime of that money.

dropping 15 floors of building from a distance of 50 feet or so is not going to destroy the remaining 85 floors beneath ejecting heavy steel 3 city blocks away

No, but dropping 15 floors of building on to 1 floor from 50 feet, thus making 16 floors of falling building, dropping onto a 2nd floor, thus making 17 floors of falling building (repeat 83 times) IS going to destroy all the floors ejecting heavy steel 3 city blocks away.
6/16/11 10:30 PM
1/1/01
Posts: 9782
HereWeAre -  They wrote us a letter! We must be right!

Nice logic there. The fact that you have to misrepresent what the letter actually says speaks volumes. <br type="_moz" />

Grasping at straws is quite common with these conspiracy theorists.

Their credibility takes another hit.
6/16/11 10:31 PM
1/1/01
Posts: 23371
Its not ballistics its common sense.    

Jesus Christ, so nothing of a smaller size can EVER destroy something of a larger size? Ever? Never?  As I said, you need to take a physics class.  Phyisics doesn't really care about what you call 'common sense'.
6/16/11 10:42 PM
7/28/02
Posts: 24251
pfsjkd - <i>Its not ballistics its common sense.    </i>

Jesus Christ, so nothing of a smaller size can EVER destroy something of a larger size? Ever? Never?  As I said, you need to take a physics class.  Phyisics doesn't really care about what you call 'common sense'.



it was a piece of itself man get some sense
6/16/11 10:43 PM
7/28/02
Posts: 24252
lol at chemical energy and fuel system


Gravity man
6/16/11 10:45 PM
5/30/05
Posts: 33946
Thuricide - Transportation Secretary Mineta testifying that Cheney consistently refused to authorize the shootdown order on these air liners: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDfdOwt2v3Y

The lack of a swift US Air Force response to not 1 but 4 hijacked airlines on 9-11 should be the primary indication to non-believers that something funny was going on with our government; at the very least they were complacent during a planned attack or ordered to do so. American jet fighters can go 1500mph yet they never got above 600 mph when finally launched for 9-11. Numerous jet fighter intercepts happen each year in America, yet on this one day, things conveniently got screwed up and was conveniently blamed on war games happening the same day which involved hijacked air liners being crashed into buildings. (Ironically enough, the British miliary was conveniently running war games involving bombs going off in their subways the same day that their subways were bombed by terrorists).

Christ, the X-Files ran an episode involving government agents committing false flag attacks with airplanes being flown into the twin towers in order to ignite wars of the government's liking.

Another newsworthy bit of information was the sheer number of Israeli agents that were onhand in New York to video tape the event. Many of these individuals were actually arrested and then deported immediately, only to appear on Israeli television stating that they were sent their to videotape the event.

One last weird bit, why was the financial trail not followed further when investigators into the funding of a number of the terrorist suspects led to military ranking officers within Pakistan?



Good post.
6/16/11 10:52 PM
7/28/02
Posts: 24253
pfsjkd - <i> I hope you are at least a well paid shill  </i>  

I've said it before and I'll say it again. . . if I'm supposed to be getting paid then someone from accounting needs to give me a fucking call cause I haven't seen a dime of that money.
<i>
dropping 15 floors of building from a distance of 50 feet or so is not going to destroy the remaining 85 floors beneath ejecting heavy steel 3 city blocks away
</i>
No, but dropping 15 floors of building on to 1 floor from 50 feet, thus making 16 floors of falling building, dropping onto a 2nd floor, thus making 17 floors of falling building (repeat 83 times) IS going to destroy all the floors ejecting heavy steel 3 city blocks away.



things.. how do they work??

volunteer shill
6/16/11 10:53 PM
2/27/01
Posts: 643
...regarding the XFILES statement I made, that episode by the XFILES spinoff series actually was televised March 2001. I forgot that a date was actually fairly important in that statement.....
6/16/11 11:16 PM
4/5/10
Posts: 5724
Lazermonkey--steel framed buildings don't just collapse, not even from intense fires (that hotel fire in Spain was much worse and it didn't collapse)...and the "sounds" of explosions were from bombs planted throughout the buildings...the people heard and felt bombs!! Phone Post
6/16/11 11:17 PM
1/1/01
Posts: 23379
things.. how do they work??

Plainly obvious that you don't know, mostly due to willful ignorance, it seems.
6/16/11 11:39 PM
7/15/04
Posts: 4568
You guys are wasting your time with these conspiracy loons who have wasted their life grasping at straws with fantasies of conspiracy. They suffer very real mental illness. The only thing that will help them is proper medication and therapy.
6/16/11 11:43 PM
12/3/03
Posts: 37371
thuricide is posting heaps of truth. good shit bro keep posting.

these guys are clearly off their meds today
6/16/11 11:46 PM
4/5/10
Posts: 5725
it's also probable that some or many of the real perpetrators (in the weeks leading to and the day of 9-11) were dressed as firemen, police, construction/electric workers, security guards, elevator crews, or business/office types...these people would have had access to the towers and vital zones such as the basements, elevators... Phone Post
6/17/11 12:30 AM
1/1/01
Posts: 23380
^What's NOT probable is that nukes BELOW the build g would cause them to collapse from the TOP down, coincidently starting right where the planes entered. Phone Post
6/17/11 1:14 AM
8/2/09
Posts: 642
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WYdAJQV100

Larry Silverstien, the FUCKN OWNER, said the decision was made to "pull it". No, not his cock. "Pull it" is a term used in the demolition buisness to initiate a controlled demolition.

Debunk that you fox news watching clones.

"I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."
6/17/11 1:24 AM
1/27/04
Posts: 10073
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WYdAJQV10

Larry Silverstien, the FUCKN OWNER, said the decision was made to "pull it". No, not his cock. "Pull it" is a term used in the demolition buisness to initiate a controlled demolition.

Debunk that you fox news watching clones.

"I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."


You are wrong.

Silverstein's Quote:

"I remember getting a call from the Fire Department commander, telling me they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, you know, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is just pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."

-Fact which is undisputed by either side, he was talking to the fire commander

-Fact which is undisputed by either side, both are not in the demolition business

Silverstein's spokesperson, Mr. McQuillan, later clarified:

"In the afternoon of September 11, Mr. Silverstein spoke to the Fire Department Commander on site at Seven World Trade Center. The Commander told Mr. Silverstein that there were several firefighters in the building working to contain the fires. Mr. Silverstein expressed his view that the most important thing was to protect the safety of those firefighters, including, if necessary, to have them withdraw from the building."

He could be lying, right? But here is the corroborating evidence...

"They told us to get out of there because they were worried about 7 World Trade Center, which is right behind it, coming down. We were up on the upper floors of the Verizon building looking at it. You could just see the whole bottom corner of the building was gone. We could look right out over to where the Trade Centers were because we were that high up. Looking over the smaller buildings. I just remember it was tremendous, tremendous fires going on. Finally they pulled us out. They said all right, get out of that building because that 7, they were really worried about. They pulled us out of there and then they regrouped everybody on Vesey Street, between the water and West Street. They put everybody back in there. Finally it did come down. From there - this is much later on in the day, because every day we were so worried about that building we didn't really want to get people close. They were trying to limit the amount of people that were in there. Finally it did come down." - Richard Banaciski

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/
Banaciski_Richard.txt

Here is more evidence they pulled the teams out waiting for a normal collapse from fire...

"The most important operational decision to be made that afternoon was the collapse (Of the WTC towers) had damaged 7 World Trade Center, which is about a 50 story building, at Vesey between West Broadway and Washington Street. It had very heavy fire on many floors and I ordered the evacuation of an area sufficient around to protect our members, so we had to give up some rescue operations that were going on at the time and back the people away far enough so that if 7 World Trade did collapse, we [wouldn't] lose any more people. We continued to operate on what we could from that distance and approximately an hour and a half after that order was [given], at 5:30 in the afternoon, World Trade Center collapsed completely" - Daniel Nigro, Chief of Department


6/17/11 1:25 AM
1/27/04
Posts: 10074
Read this, please?

http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm
6/17/11 1:29 AM
1/27/04
Posts: 10075
Interesting. They needed to be sure that building 6 came down in a “controlled” way. But wait a second: the video clip that Alex Jones presents – the clip that’s shown on all the conspiracist websites –ends abruptly at this point. Huh? Where’s the money shot? Why’d they cut it there?

Here’s why:

Because the following scene shows how building 6 was “pulled”: with cables attached to the hydraulic arms of four excavators, not with explosive charges.

“We’ve got the cables attached in four different locations going up. Now they’re pulling the building to the north. It’s not every day you try to pull down a eight story building with cables.”

Narrator Kevin Spacey: “The use of explosives to demolish World Trade Centers 4, 5 and 6 was rejected for fear workers would risk their lives entering buildings to set the charges.”

Why do they pull that part of the documentary out of the conspiracy story? This is yet another example of outright deception by the so called "truth" movement and its leaders like Alex Jones. They draw their stories around the truth like a child drawing around their hand.

However, was the fire more severe than conspiracy theorists let on and was Silverstein's quote taken out of context? The two are related and are explored below.



Just do a little reading and see how conspiracy folks leave out KEY ELEMENTS in their theories.

Once again here is the site that actually MAKES SENSE.

http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm
6/17/11 1:29 AM
12/3/03
Posts: 37380
ihitpeople - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WYdAJQV100

Larry Silverstien, the FUCKN OWNER, said the decision was made to "pull it". No, not his cock. "Pull it" is a term used in the demolition buisness to initiate a controlled demolition.

Debunk that you fox news watching clones.

"I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."


yep. the lunatics on here denying even the possibility the US let it happen or staged the attacks just crack me up.

I am not saying its 100% fake. I am saying there are enough holes in the official story to justify a truly independent official investigation.

the govt. has a history of doing shit like this and like I said it would be an exception if there was no monkey business involved with 9/11.
6/17/11 1:50 AM
1/27/04
Posts: 10076
EY take look at what I posted.

Please don't pick and choose and take things out of context either.

Here look at this.

http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm

6/17/11 1:56 AM
4/15/08
Posts: 22008
lazermonkey - 

Please don't pick and choose and take things out of context either.




Please follow your own advice.
6/17/11 1:59 AM
1/27/04
Posts: 10077
xcouturefan - 
lazermonkey - 

Please don't pick and choose and take things out of context either.




Please follow your own advice.


Actually I DO exactly that.

I don't leave out key elements, you conspiracy folks? your stories have more holes than Swiss Cheese! lol

http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm
6/17/11 2:01 AM
1/27/04
Posts: 10078
Ok Conspiracy Geniuses...


What happened on 9/11/2001?

Give us the "official story" you guys have cooked up in your own minds.


I am sure everyone is curious as to what happened. I mean, after all, you guys were there, right?

6/17/11 2:39 AM
6/11/11
Posts: 11
So this thread went to complete shit quick.
6/17/11 4:22 AM
7/15/04
Posts: 4575
ProjectMayhem - ^^ This thread started off as complete shit.

Lol.

Lazermonkey you are spot on but these mentally I'll misfits won't ever realize their whole purpose in life is a farce. How depressing.